Kathleen E. Corley, PhD
@drkathleenecorley.bsky.social
590 followers 1.8K following 2.2K posts
Professor Emerita of New Testament and Christianity University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh Author of 4 books on women and the New Testament Old member of the Jesus Seminar
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Kathleen E. Corley, PhD
jennycohn.bsky.social
👀A Rutgers professor who teaches an anti-fascism class was blocked from leaving the US hours > Trump’s “Antifa” roundtable w/ Jack Posobiec who has called Bray a “domestic terrorist professor.” TPUSA at Rutgers has called him an “antifa member,” a claim he denies. He’s received death threats. 1/
US anti-fascism expert blocked from flying to Spain at airport
Rutgers University professor who published book on antifa was informed at boarding gate that his trip was cancelled
www.theguardian.com
drkathleenecorley.bsky.social
This review below is really funny if you do know something about “Waiting for Godot.”
@ericowens.bsky.social
luxalptraum.com
TFW you paid $1400 to see Beckett’s most famous work without knowing anything about it
One Star Review of Waiting for Godot on Broadway
I recently attended Waiting for Godot on Broadway and spent over $1,400 for two Row C seats (103 and 104). I'm a longtime admirer of Broadway productions and even hold a season pass for Shea's Performing Arts Theatre, so I came in with genuine enthusiasm and high expectations. Unfortunately, this show was unlike anything ! have ever experienced —and not in a good way.
What I encountered was not the artistry, music, or emotional storytelling I usually associate with Broadway, but instead what felt like an endless cycle of nonsensical conversation between characters who seemed trapped in their own madness. I tried-truly tried-to find meaning, symbolism, or even a thread of emotional resonance. I stayed through the first half hoping the second would offer clarity. But by intermission, it was clear: this was a waste of both time and money.
Keanu Reeves is an actor I respect greatly, but I cannot fathom why he would agree to participate in such a disjointed, inaccessible production. His talent was lost in a performance that defied reason rather than provoked insight.
To anyone considering attending: unless you are drawn to highly abstract, nearly incomprehensible theater, I strongly caution you against this show. For the average, educated, thoughtful theatergoer, it is far more frustrating than fulfilling. In my opinion, this was the single most disappointing Broadway experience I've ever had - an unfortunate waste of money and, more importantly, of time.
Reposted by Kathleen E. Corley, PhD
radiofreetom.bsky.social
Folks, the oath of enlisted people and officers are two different oaths. The officer's oath does not include the stuff about the president.
wheystandard.bsky.social
Again, the oath has mentioned obeying orders of the President since 1789. Here it is as established by Congress in 1962, in Public Law 87-751 (codified then in 10 USC 501, codified after 1968 in 10 USC 502):
Public Law 87-751
October 5, 1962
AN ACT
(H. R. 218]
To provide that individuals enlisted into the Armed Forces of the United States shall take an oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States.
Armed Forces.
Enlistment oath.
70A Stat. 17.
National Guard.
70A Stat. 602.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 501 of title 10, United States Code, is amended as follows:
"$ 501. Enlistment oath: who may administer
"Each person enlisting in an armed force shall take the following oath:
-→ do solemnly swear (or affirm) that
I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, accorang to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
Reposted by Kathleen E. Corley, PhD
kairyssdal.bsky.social
Fail
passantino.bsky.social
CNN is now using the Trump preferred “Department of War” name in its official statements
drkathleenecorley.bsky.social
Bigger fish? What in the world is this person talking about?
drkathleenecorley.bsky.social
Oops!
schotthappens.com
The congressional map approved by Utah lawmakers on Monday jams three GOP incumbents, Reps. Blake Moore, Burgess Owens and Mike Kennedy into the same district.

If the judge chooses that map, two of them won't be able to vote for themselves.

www.utahpoliticalwatch.news/option-c-opt...
Utah redistricting: Legislature's map jams GOP trio into one district
Utah legislature's congressional map packs three GOP incumbents into the same district, forcing them to campaign outside home districts.
www.utahpoliticalwatch.news
drkathleenecorley.bsky.social
atrupar.com
SORTOR: I took this flag from the man that was burning it in the street

TRUMP: Do you know who he is?

SORTOR: Oh yeah

TRUMP: So why don't you give it to Pam. Give it to the attorney general and we'll start prosecutions
Reposted by Kathleen E. Corley, PhD
joshuajfriedman.com
Previously: A panel of two Trump appointees and one Clinton appointee will hear the Trump admin's appeal of Judge Immergut's order blocking NG deployment in Oregon.

(Though Judge Immergut is herself a Trump appointee, so you never know!)
joshuajfriedman.com
NEW: The Ninth Circuit schedules oral argument for Thursday in the Trump admin's appeal of Judge Immergut's order temporarily blocking the deployment of National Guard troops to Portland, Oregon.

The panel assignment:
Susan P. Graber (Clinton)
Ryan D. Nelson (Trump)
Bridget S. Bade (Trump)
2025-10-09 9:00 am Courtroom 2, 3rd Floor Rm 330, James R. Browning U.S. Courthouse, San Francisco
Before: GRABER, R. NELSON, and BADE, Circuit Judges
Case No.
25-6268
State of Oregon, et al. v. Trump, et al.
Reposted by Kathleen E. Corley, PhD
joshuajfriedman.com
NEW: A Ninth Circuit panel temporarily permits the federalization but NOT the deployment of National Guard troops in Oregon, in advance of tomorrow's oral arguments.
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
In the circumstances here, granting an administrative stay will best preserve the status quo. Prior to the October 4 temporary restraining order, Oregon National Guard members had been federalized but not deployed. The Memorandum
authorized federalization of the Oregon National Guard members. An
administrative stay of the October 4 temporary restraining order will maintain the
federalization of Oregon National Guard members, because that order prohibits
implementation of the Memorandum. Additionally, the second temporary
restraining order has not been challenged or appealed, and it prohibits the
deployment of National Guard members in Oregon. Thus, the effect of granting an administrative stay preserves the status quo in which National Guard members have been federalized but not deployed.
Administrative Stay GRANTED.
drkathleenecorley.bsky.social
More on quelling protest in Austin, TX. @radiofreetom.bsky.social
atrupar.com
"Maybe you can look into that, Pam" -- Trump directs Pam Bondi to try to stop a planned anti-Trump rally in Austin
drkathleenecorley.bsky.social
Maybe he’ll send the Texas National Guard to Austin to quell
the protest. @radiofreetom.bsky.social
atrupar.com
"I'd love to do something about that" -- Trump floats the idea of stopping a planned protest in Austin
drkathleenecorley.bsky.social
And there’s more. @radiofreetom.bsky.social
atrupar.com
Trump: "We took the freedom of speech away because that's been through the courts and the courts said you have freedom of speech, but what has happened is when they burn a flag it agitates and irritates crowds."
drkathleenecorley.bsky.social
atrupar.com
Jonathan Choe to Trump: "Another group right now that is behind antifa and working with antifa very closely based on the research that we have right now that we're gonna give to you and your team are the Democratic Socialists of America."