David S. Cohen
banner
dsc250.bsky.social
David S. Cohen
@dsc250.bsky.social

feminist "law" professor, reproductive rights scholar/activist, avid cyclist, husband, dad, indie rock enthusiast, Vermont lover, Phillies fan, he/him

David Samuel Cohen is an American attorney who served as deputy director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) from 2021 to 2025, previously holding the position from February 9, 2015 to January 20, 2017. He served as acting director of the CIA from January 20 to March 19, 2021 until the Senate confirmation of William J. Burns. .. more

Political science 48%
Law 16%
Pinned
My new book with @carolejoffe.bsky.social -- After Dobbs: How the Supreme Court Ended Roe But Not Abortion -- comes out in just over a week. Pre-order now from your favorite booksellers, like Bookshop.org!

bookshop.org/p/books/afte...

and don’t forget sexist too

Reposted by David S. Cohen

On one side, you have trans people asking to be left alone and maintain our access to health care. On the other, a bunch of people who believe we shouldn't exist. But Cass believes both sides are the same.

This whole interview is atrocious.

www.bbc.com/news/article...
Our court system is largely working, with the exception of the most important court

New rule for movies - if you’re going to have 98% of the hundreds of characters be white men in suits most roughly similar ages, the movie must have name tags at all times.

And goddamn - get a fucking Jewish actor to play a Jew! Is that so hard?!?!

I have long thought that one part of the fascination with making historical movies like this is to give full employment to white male actors.

Not the only reason. But not a non-reason either.

And did every single white man in Hollywood get a job out of that film?

Finally watched Oppenheimer. Wow did that need an editor.

This is what humanity looks like.
Yesterday morning kids were sent running from their bus stop in panic because ICE showed up. This guy at today’s ICE Out of Lindenwold protest is a must watch 😭. @maddow.bsky.social

everyone
Roses are red
Violets are blue
Everyone in the Epstein files should lose positions of power
and be exiled from polite society, too

Reposted by David S. Cohen

Roses are red
Violets are blue
Everyone in the Epstein files should lose positions of power
and be exiled from polite society, too

Reposted by David S. Cohen

This is Lexa. She really hopes you’ll be her valentine. Wouldn’t want to waste this look on just anybody. 14/10 (IG: bambiandlexa)

This account is an anti-ICE account. Come and get me.

I was told ChatGPT could Bluebook well so I tried it. Put in a link to a David Cole NYRB article.

It spit out a cite with the author as Pamela Karlan.

I told it that was wrong.

It responded, “sorry I should have said Pamela S. Karlan.“

🤦🤦
Every legal academic who loathes AI will do a 180 the moment LLMs can reliably complete all our missing footnotes in Bluebook format with appropriate quotes in parentheticals.
(I'm counting myself among this group)
‪Doctors say that vaccines protect children from dangerous diseases. A nepo baby who barbecues dogs and snorts cocaine off toilet seats says that vaccines make children vulnerable to 5G radiation. For busy parents, it can be hard to know who to trust.
Yesterday morning kids were sent running from their bus stop in panic because ICE showed up. This guy at today’s ICE Out of Lindenwold protest is a must watch 😭. @maddow.bsky.social

Reposted by David S. Cohen

This account is an anti-ICE account. Come and get me www.nytimes.com/2026/02/13/t...
Homeland Security Wants Social Media Sites to Expose Anti-ICE Accounts
www.nytimes.com
“Summarize this document”

No. Never. I can read, asshole robot

Pan to Federalist Society spending the weekend frantically pre-writing articles and op-eds to support these “not yet articulated or vetted” but “irrefutable“ positions.…
Trump’s follow up post says he’s going to issue an executive order on voter ID.

“If we can't get it through Congress, there are Legal reasons why this SCAM is not permitted. I will be presenting them shortly, in the form of an Executive Order.”
Every legal academic who loathes AI will do a 180 the moment LLMs can reliably complete all our missing footnotes in Bluebook format with appropriate quotes in parentheticals.
(I'm counting myself among this group)

Reposted by David S. Cohen

If society doesn't normalize instantly knocking stalker glasses off people's faces, then I guess the alternative is to simply mask up all the time
Meta Plans to Add Facial Recognition Technology to Its Smart Glasses
www.nytimes.com

I agree with you on that - another reason I am a skeptic. But I'm also a skeptic who is willing to entertain the possibility that I'm wildly wrong.

In which case, I'm thinking about the possibility that my students are going to face a very different world than we are teaching them for. And soon.

For instance, according to Hard Fork this morning, this essay has gone viral and is making (some) people think we are, for AI, in the February before the pandemic changed the world.

So for law and law schools, what are we doing about that?
Something Big Is Happening
A personal note for non-tech friends and family on what AI is starting to change.
shumer.dev

Thanks. Printing now to read. But that's from winter 2024. It seems we're many generations further down the road now in winter 2026.

That's where my heart and head are. But, I am also allowing for the possibility that I'm just 100% wrong.

In which case, what should we law schools be doing for a radically changed world that our students might be entering?

I'd love to read someone writing thoughtfully about that.

Reposted by David S. Cohen

Sorry sorry sorry, I forgot that men have no decision making power over their own behavior and that rape is a naturally occurring phenomenon with no beneficiaries and no agents, like the weather.

I'm not an AI-inevitablist. But, among those that are, or among those who think that's a serious possibility....

Who's doing the best writing/thinking about what inevitable AI means for law schools teaching future lawyers?

Reposted by David S. Cohen

Something that was done *to* him, you say? Not something *he* did?
“He got Me Tooed” “He got Epsteined” amazing that people have re-invented the police passive for rapists.