"Models casting egalitarian societies as crucibles of equality perpetuate the factually uninformed notion that foragers are somehow more noble. Critiques portray egalitarianism as romantic fantasy. Neither characterization is wholly justified."
doi.org/10.1017/S014...
Camila et al. have spent several years(!!!) developing this vital piece of work, so do check it out and share
Camila et al. have spent several years(!!!) developing this vital piece of work, so do check it out and share
It's an ambitious goal to write the entire history of humanity in just 400 pages. It's even more ambitious to do it without reading any research.
Also note that an this early online uncorrected proof - Baylor University does not have a UK campus ☺️
"Models casting egalitarian societies as crucibles of equality perpetuate the factually uninformed notion that foragers are somehow more noble. Critiques portray egalitarianism as romantic fantasy. Neither characterization is wholly justified."
doi.org/10.1017/S014...
Also note that an this early online uncorrected proof - Baylor University does not have a UK campus ☺️
"Models casting egalitarian societies as crucibles of equality perpetuate the factually uninformed notion that foragers are somehow more noble. Critiques portray egalitarianism as romantic fantasy. Neither characterization is wholly justified."
doi.org/10.1017/S014...
"Models casting egalitarian societies as crucibles of equality perpetuate the factually uninformed notion that foragers are somehow more noble. Critiques portray egalitarianism as romantic fantasy. Neither characterization is wholly justified."
doi.org/10.1017/S014...
"Models casting egalitarian societies as crucibles of equality perpetuate the factually uninformed notion that foragers are somehow more noble. Critiques portray egalitarianism as romantic fantasy. Neither characterization is wholly justified."
doi.org/10.1017/S014...
"Models casting egalitarian societies as crucibles of equality perpetuate the factually uninformed notion that foragers are somehow more noble. Critiques portray egalitarianism as romantic fantasy. Neither characterization is wholly justified."
doi.org/10.1017/S014...
@ces2026.bsky.social @culturalevolsoc.bsky.social
🔗Submit here: airess.fgses-um6p.ma/ces2026
We look forward to seeing you in Rabat!
Can anyone think of a better way to handle this variable that preserves the logical weightings?
Can anyone think of a better way to handle this variable that preserves the logical weightings?
I trained in Evo Psych. I trained in Behavioural Ecology too which maybe helps but I came into academia an enthusiastic researcher of sexual selection.
1/
I trained in Evo Psych. I trained in Behavioural Ecology too which maybe helps but I came into academia an enthusiastic researcher of sexual selection.
1/
www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
www.bmj.com/content/bmj/...
www.bmj.com/content/bmj/...
#archaeology #MiddlePleistocene […]
#archaeology #MiddlePleistocene […]
www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...
www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...
I believe the primary metric is house-size inequality which is, of course, not wholly a straightforward proxy for inequality sensu lato; but the findings & the data story seem eminently sensible.
www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1...
I believe the primary metric is house-size inequality which is, of course, not wholly a straightforward proxy for inequality sensu lato; but the findings & the data story seem eminently sensible.
www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dayligh...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dayligh...
But it really is mostly this.
But it really is mostly this.