Fabian Neumann
@fneum.bsky.social
370 followers 180 following 39 posts
Energy system modeller at TU Berlin | Dr.-Ing. | previously KIT, Edinburgh uni | openmod ally | PyPSA team
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Fabian Neumann
aukehoekstra.bsky.social
@nworbmot.bsky.social is doing really important stuff again, simulating how methanol (instead of hydrogen) could be the fuel to power a system otherwise mainly running on solar, wind and batteries. SUPER interesting paper.
arxiv.org/html/2505.09...
fneum.bsky.social
Import choices shape infrastructure needs:

Smaller size of the hydrogen network when green fuels and materials are imported at scale and ammonia- or steel-making can relocate within Europe.
fneum.bsky.social
Keeping some European power-to-X in Europe has some advantages:

Flexible operation helps balancing wind and solar variability.

Its waste heat could be supplied to district heating systems in urban areas.

Using Europe’s biogenic and industrial CO₂ streams means lower dependency on DAC.
fneum.bsky.social
Only focusing on direct hydrogen imports cuts cost benefit in half.

Imports of derivative products like ammonia and methanol are preferred
fneum.bsky.social
Importing green energy and steel products (like HBI) has some advantages:

System costs fall by 1–10 % across a ±20% import cost range

In this range, cost-effective import volumes range between 1000 and 2000 TWh (~30-60 Mt H₂-eq)

No cost savings beyond imports of 3000 TWh (~90 Mt H₂-eq)
fneum.bsky.social
What we explored:

A full sweep of scenarios, interpolating between complete self-sufficiency and wide-ranging imports, plus sensitivity tests on low vs. high import prices and on excluding specific vectors to map the cost-effective space.

What we learned:
Reposted by Fabian Neumann
mliebreich.bsky.social
It really was a fascinating conversation. He's very good on Russia and decarbonisation, and stood his ground when I pushed him pretty hard on energy costs and hydrogen.
youtu.be/BsK-MhUH09c?...
⁠Hydrogen Subsidies, Clean Power & Fixing Spain's Blackouts | Ep212: EU Commissioner Dan Jørgensen
YouTube video by Cleaning Up Podcast
youtu.be
fneum.bsky.social
On a stage with style!
Reposted by Fabian Neumann
nworbmot.bsky.social
As the hydrogen bubble deflates, what are the alternatives? We present a "minimal methanol economy": using methanol as a gap-filler for the few sectors electrification can't reach.

New working paper together with Philipp Glaum, @fneum.bsky.social, @millinger.bsky.social:

arxiv.org/abs/2505.09277
Reposted by Fabian Neumann
natenergy.nature.com
New work from Hofmann and colleagues shows how hydrogen and carbon dioxide networks influence whether CO2 is transported to renewable hubs and sequestration sites, or H2 is delivered to industrial sites for producing clean fuels from captured CO2.
H2 and CO2 network strategies for the European energy system - Nature Energy
This study on European carbon management shows how H2 and CO2 networks influence whether CO2 is transported to renewable hubs and sequestration sites or H2 is delivered to industrial sites for producing clean fuels from captured CO2.
bit.ly
Reposted by Fabian Neumann
martavictoria.bsky.social
We are offering a new free, hands-on, two-day workshop on PyPSA-Eur, this time in Copenhagen!

📅 Dates: June 26-27, 2025
📍 Location: DTU - Lyngby
👨‍🏫 Instructors: @fneum.bsky.social, @iriepin.bsky.social, @martavictoria.bsky.social Aleksander Grochowicz
Registration: forms.gle/4559UPat7NtM...
Reposted by Fabian Neumann
fneum.bsky.social
✈️🚢🧪For Europe's green fuels for aviation, shipping, and chemicals: Should we pipeline H₂ to industrial CO₂ capture sites, or CO₂ to regions with better renewable resources for H₂ production?

📖 See our new study in @natureenergy.bsky.social on future carbon management: www.nature.com/articles/s41...
Reposted by Fabian Neumann
wpschill.bsky.social
Cool new paper from the PyPSA core team 👏🔽
fneum.bsky.social
✈️🚢🧪For Europe's green fuels for aviation, shipping, and chemicals: Should we pipeline H₂ to industrial CO₂ capture sites, or CO₂ to regions with better renewable resources for H₂ production?

📖 See our new study in @natureenergy.bsky.social on future carbon management: www.nature.com/articles/s41...
fneum.bsky.social
And greetings from the Tauernpass. I might not respond immediately -
busy gasping for air 🚵‍♂️🫁
fneum.bsky.social
In the paper, we also explore some more scenarios, e.g. with none or only one of the networks available. So if you're curios about a detailed infrastructure view on Europe's Carbon Management Strategy, have a look! We look forward to your questions! 🌱

Of course, this was made with #PyPSA 😉
fneum.bsky.social
We also find that the combination of both networks remains advantageous when climate targets are tightened toward net CO₂ removal. The CO₂ network allows effective utilization of unavoidable industrial emissions through capture and transport to utilization or sequestration sites
fneum.bsky.social
We show that dividing tasks between networks can be cost-effective: hydrogen pipelines deliver hydrogen from the South to industrial centres for fuel synthesis, while CO₂ pipelines transport captured emissions from these clusters to geological sequestration sites, e.g., in the North Sea.
fneum.bsky.social
Also: Captured CO₂ from some residual industrial emissions, or biomass for negative emissions, will need to be transported to geological storage sites.
fneum.bsky.social
With strict limits for sustainable biofuels and carbon sequestration of 200 Mt a year, large volumes of both molecules must be brought together for green fuel synthesis for aviation, shipping and the chemicals industry, but are rarely co-located.
fneum.bsky.social
Our team of @tuberlin.bsky.social researchers showed that combined infrastructure for hydrogen and CO₂ pipeline networks could reduce Europe's energy system costs by up to 5.3%, or approximately €41 billion per year. But development requires careful planning across borders and sectors.