Why Catherine? A properly functioning moral compass. Sharp as a tack. But you have to want it (not a LOT, but at least a little). I understand.
Color me "Open" right now. But '26 may make '28 meaningless.
Calling subsidized private health insurance a socialist scheme is a quick way to show everyone that when you decry "socialism," you just mean anything that helps people.
We, are social primates. On our own, dead social primates. Some form of 'socialism' then, should be second nature to us.
Were it not for those of extreme privilege who deliberately confuse it with excesses it is only tangentally related to.
Mamdani: That’s how I felt when we came up with this plan. Together, we will expand the idea of what is possible in our city—and what sounds and noises we can make at a press conference.
“The US state department is set to fund Maga-aligned think-tanks and charities across Europe to disseminate Washington’s policy positions and challenge perceived threats to free speech.”
via @annasophiegross.bsky.social and colleagues
It CAN be done. Get involved where you live and push back.
www.elpasotimes.com/story/news/i...
-James Baldwin
-James Baldwin
ICE doesn’t give a fuck about court orders.
Americans have watched in horror as ICE has terrorized communities across the country
Federal agents can’t continue to cause chaos in our cities while more Americans are killed
We must rein in ICE
Here’s what we're demanding:
ICE doesn’t give a fuck about court orders.
When he sells WaPo back to a real independent owner, you can call your boycott off.
You have no other power over the man. Zero. But you can hurt him bad.
When he sells WaPo back to a real independent owner, you can call your boycott off.
You have no other power over the man. Zero. But you can hurt him bad.
You misspelled "participated in the abuse of underage women".
How can you treat a series of serious offenses with a wink and indifference? Like a male joke?
Short on space? Partied has 7 letters; abused 6.
You misspelled "participated in the abuse of underage women".
How can you treat a series of serious offenses with a wink and indifference? Like a male joke?
Short on space? Partied has 7 letters; abused 6.
This implies that MAGA, which 𝒏𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒓 had a presidential election majority, ever, is going to just give up & be neutered.
271 days.
I prefer amendment to abandonment. But I'm convinced Article 5 is the keystone. Agree with you that either 3/5 or 2/3 is better than 3/4.
But who's working on this? (rhetorical)
@tribelaw.bsky.social
This implies that MAGA, which 𝒏𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒓 had a presidential election majority, ever, is going to just give up & be neutered.
271 days.
I prefer amendment to abandonment. But I'm convinced Article 5 is the keystone. Agree with you that either 3/5 or 2/3 is better than 3/4.
But who's working on this? (rhetorical)
@tribelaw.bsky.social
I prefer amendment to abandonment. But I'm convinced Article 5 is the keystone. Agree with you that either 3/5 or 2/3 is better than 3/4.
But who's working on this? (rhetorical)
@tribelaw.bsky.social
@tribelaw.bsky.social
Immunity? That SCOTUS decision goes against just about everything anyone who can read "no man is above the law" would assume. An amendment would perhaps put this activist court back on its haunches.
No sensible person ever thought that (What?) thousands of pardons would be appropriate? We now we've seen that loophole, but who can fix it? You could slice the baby, perhaps? How many per term might be appropriate? Three? I'd go with two, but no one can talk about ANY limit.
Immunity? That SCOTUS decision goes against just about everything anyone who can read "no man is above the law" would assume. An amendment would perhaps put this activist court back on its haunches.
No sensible person ever thought that (What?) thousands of pardons would be appropriate? We now we've seen that loophole, but who can fix it? You could slice the baby, perhaps? How many per term might be appropriate? Three? I'd go with two, but no one can talk about ANY limit.
No sensible person ever thought that (What?) thousands of pardons would be appropriate? We now we've seen that loophole, but who can fix it? You could slice the baby, perhaps? How many per term might be appropriate? Three? I'd go with two, but no one can talk about ANY limit.
Essentially, she is correct. The document can hardly be amended. So it's frozen. Let's take one egregious example, the current president's 𝒗𝒂𝒔𝒕 expansion of pardons—beyond imaginable.
Essentially, she is correct. The document can hardly be amended. So it's frozen. Let's take one egregious example, the current president's 𝒗𝒂𝒔𝒕 expansion of pardons—beyond imaginable.
@nancypope.bsky.social
@foreignsubstance.bsky.social
Just listen to the first 3 minutes or so. You'll probably want to listen longer, because this is, metaphorically, both barrels of a shotgun detonating in El caudillo gordo's mouth.
And the prescription, could kill a presidency, but maybe cure a country.
pca.st/7egmkmlw
Just listen to the first 3 minutes or so. You'll probably want to listen longer, because this is, metaphorically, both barrels of a shotgun detonating in El caudillo gordo's mouth.
And the prescription, could kill a presidency, but maybe cure a country.
pca.st/7egmkmlw
Already this has happened in Oz, where kids reportedly like the ban, but complain about exclusion when others can break it.
And enforcement: a nightmare.
And enforcement: a nightmare.
And enforcement: a nightmare.
-James Baldwin
-James Baldwin