Michał Gulczyński
gulczynski.bsky.social
Michał Gulczyński
@gulczynski.bsky.social
Max Weber Fellow at the European University Institute | PhD from Bocconi University | Studying mostly gender | @schmorpl.bsky.social | "Przemilczane nierówności. O problemach mężczyzn w Polsce"
Reposted by Michał Gulczyński
Happy that our paper with @bogatyrev.bsky.social, @tabouchadi.bsky.social, @heikekluever.bsky.social, and @lstoetze.bsky.social found a home at @thejop.bsky.social. You can read it here 👇

www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/...

Thanks to all the fantastic people giving feedback and supporting us
November 22, 2025 at 7:27 PM
Reposted by Michał Gulczyński
Our paper just got accepted in the @thejop.bsky.social 🎉 and is now on the journal website: www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/... For me personally, it's a milestone: my first paper accepted after a peer review!
November 22, 2025 at 7:05 PM
Reposted by Michał Gulczyński
🚨 New article alert!

Congratulations to our LSE Fellow, Dr @bogatyrev.bsky.social and his co-authors for the publication of their latest article, 'The Electoral Effects of State-Sponsored Anti-LGBTQ Measures' in @thejop.bsky.social.

Read the article 👇🏽

www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/...
The Electoral Effects of State-Sponsored Anti-LGBTQ Measures | The Journal of Politics: Vol 0, No ja
www.journals.uchicago.edu
November 24, 2025 at 2:20 PM
Reposted by Michał Gulczyński
IN NEW ISSUE: Are more women elected in proportional elections than in majoritarian ones? @gulczynski.bsky.social, @monikaturyna.bsky.social & @jkantorowicz.bsky.social examine local Polish elections and find little evidence of that. Read OPEN ACCESS: buff.ly/UH5PdOR

@polstudiesassoc.bsky.social
November 22, 2025 at 10:00 PM
Since 2023, women get more habilitations in Poland than men. More details in my article for @forumakademickie.bsky.social ⬇️
👩‍🔬 W 2023 roku po raz pierwszy w historii polskiej nauki kobiety uzyskały minimalnie więcej habilitacji od mężczyzn. W ub.r. powtórzyły ten wynik. Odsetek pań wśród nowych profesorów tytularnych wzrósł do 43%.

Najnowsze dane przedstawia @gulczynski.bsky.social ⬇️

forumakademickie.pl/kobiety-drug...
November 17, 2025 at 3:46 PM
Reposted by Michał Gulczyński
👩‍🔬 W 2023 roku po raz pierwszy w historii polskiej nauki kobiety uzyskały minimalnie więcej habilitacji od mężczyzn. W ub.r. powtórzyły ten wynik. Odsetek pań wśród nowych profesorów tytularnych wzrósł do 43%.

Najnowsze dane przedstawia @gulczynski.bsky.social ⬇️

forumakademickie.pl/kobiety-drug...
November 17, 2025 at 12:36 PM
Reposted by Michał Gulczyński
Please share!: Last week to apply for @epssnet.bsky.social Belfast 2026

really good news is that there's been an amazing response to the call for papers already; now very excited for this meeting

⬇️ We put together a quick FAQ on Qs that have come up on submitting: epssnet.org/conferences/...
EPSS 2026 submissions FAQ - EPSS
Submissions are coming in fast for Belfast 2026 and so are your questions about submissions. Here are answers to the most common questions: Where do I go to submit? For panel submission: https://app.oxfordabstracts.com/events/75765/symposia/create For paper submission: https://app.oxfordabstracts.com/stages/79266/submissions/new? How many papers can I submit? We put a constraint of max one presentation per person. This does …
epssnet.org
November 3, 2025 at 10:49 AM
Reposted by Michał Gulczyński
🚨 Important quote: "We put a constraint of max ONE presentation per person. This does not prevent you from being a coauthor on papers that others are presenting".
November 3, 2025 at 11:53 AM
Reposted by Michał Gulczyński
Doch, in der Schweiz ist diese Entwicklung sogar fast noch ausgeprägter, ich hatte hierfür mal diese Grafik gebastelt gehabt:
November 2, 2025 at 3:21 PM
Reposted by Michał Gulczyński
Seksisme en politiek.
I identified 97 studies (including 84 after Trump was elected in 2016 and 42 on that election alone).
Most of the papers have been dedicated to the US. I hope the questions included in the recent @ess-survey.bsky.social will lead to many new studies on Europe.
2/7
October 28, 2025 at 8:43 PM
Reposted by Michał Gulczyński
As one reviewer said: “The appendix is a treasure trove of information.”
It has two parts:
1) An Excel table with a detailed description of all studies: concepts and survey items, research questions, results. I tried to make this database easy to search through and filter.
osf.io/fajcy/
5/7
OSF
osf.io
October 27, 2025 at 7:42 AM
Reposted by Michał Gulczyński
So useful!
Many studies attribute the success of right-wing parties to sexism.

What is sexism? How is it measured? How does it influence elections?

My systematic review of studies on sexism as a predictor of political behavior and attitudes is about to appear in @poqjournal.bsky.social!
1/7
October 28, 2025 at 8:21 PM
Reposted by Michał Gulczyński
Gender attitudes are likely more important than gender alone.
The literature confirms that hostile and modern sexism played a role in Trump’s election and probably the success of other radical/far-right parties.

3/7
October 27, 2025 at 7:42 AM
Many studies attribute the success of right-wing parties to sexism.

What is sexism? How is it measured? How does it influence elections?

My systematic review of studies on sexism as a predictor of political behavior and attitudes is about to appear in @poqjournal.bsky.social!
1/7
October 27, 2025 at 7:42 AM
Some questions never get old in the social sciences.
You can use very old ideas, adapt them to new contexts, and make a huge contribution.
October 13, 2025 at 11:26 AM
Only four Europeans remain in the 19th Chopin Competition.
October 12, 2025 at 11:26 PM
Reposted by Michał Gulczyński
🚨 New article out today in @cpsjournal.bsky.social !

📄 “Strategic Inclusion Without Transformation: How Populist Radical Right Parties Engage With Women’s Interests”

With Bonnie Meguid, @hildecoffe.bsky.social & Miki Kittilson

🔗 doi.org/10.1177/0010...
Strategic Inclusion Without Transformation: How Populist Radical Right Parties Engage With Women’s Interests - Bonnie M. Meguid, Hilde Coffé, Ana Catalano Weeks, Miki Caul Kittilson, 2025
Despite their Männerparteien reputation, populist radical right (PRR) parties have recently expanded their agendas to include women’s interests. When do they em...
doi.org
October 1, 2025 at 9:33 AM
Reposted by Michał Gulczyński
✨ SPS Welcome 2025 ✨

Yesterday evening, we welcomed our new cohort of #SPS researchers.

Head of Department @arnoutvanderijt.bsky.social, together with our academic faculty, greeted the first-year researchers and celebrated the start of a new academic journey.

Cheers to a fruitful year ahead! 🥂📚
September 24, 2025 at 3:18 PM
Over the last decades, tertiary education has expanded rapidly - especially for women. They have overtaken men in all EU countries and the gaps keep growing in many of them.

In four countries, the gender gap is larger than 20 percentage points.

Are we ready for any egalitarian policies?
August 11, 2025 at 8:16 AM
This headline is incredibly satisfying:
"The Ministry of Education wants to improve boys' education. It will appoint a representative."

After four years of my academic and public activity, the Ministry of Education now acknowledges a problem they denied as recently as 16 months ago.
August 6, 2025 at 12:39 PM
Reposted by Michał Gulczyński
1/ New paper out in Electoral Studies with @heikekluever.bsky.social and @cornelius-erfort.bsky.social
We show that nuclear power plants reduce electoral support for Green parties in Germany.
🔗 www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
A thread on the paper:
How nuclear power hurts the Greens: Evidence from German nuclear power plants
What are the electoral consequences of nuclear energy for Green parties? Despite the centrality of nuclear opposition to Green party platforms, and th…
www.sciencedirect.com
July 25, 2025 at 9:09 AM
90% of unaccompanied minors applying for asylum in the EU are boys.
July 25, 2025 at 8:36 AM
People are more likely to accept gender inequality if it is men who are worse off.

A new paper with experiments on 35k Americans shows that when men are worse off people are:
- more likely to attribute the inequality to a difference in effort
- less likely to support pro-equality policies.
July 8, 2025 at 7:54 PM