James Goodwin
banner
jamesgoodwin.bsky.social
James Goodwin
@jamesgoodwin.bsky.social

I'm Policy Director at @progressivereform.bsky.social where I specialize in federal regulatory policy. When not analyzing federal regulatory policy, I enjoy silent film, soccer, and running.

"Oh! I'm sorry! This is abuse." .. more

Geology 14%
Political science 14%
Pinned
Now that we're staring down the barrel of Project 2025, I guess it's a good time to re-up this essay I wrote a few months ago exploring its plans for an authoritarian administrative state www.bostonreview.net/articles/ins...
Inside Project 2025 - Boston Review
Backed by the Heritage Foundation, the initiative seeks to undermine longstanding safeguards against abuses of executive power.
www.bostonreview.net

Project 2025 in action
“Though Black women only account for about 14% of the workforce, they represented over half of all women’s job losses during the U.S. employment market’s most volatile months in 2025, like March, April, June, and December.”

I can't think of a single major policy challenge we face that can be solved without inconvenience to wealthy/powerful people. The one exception seems to be racism, which is worth contemplating.

Katamari is older than I thought
It was believed in medieval times that hedgehogs had spikes so they could roll over fruit to carry home to their children, which is not true but is a really cute idea

Reposted by James Goodwin

“Though Black women only account for about 14% of the workforce, they represented over half of all women’s job losses during the U.S. employment market’s most volatile months in 2025, like March, April, June, and December.”
It was believed in medieval times that hedgehogs had spikes so they could roll over fruit to carry home to their children, which is not true but is a really cute idea

Reposted by James Goodwin

There's no legal or economic justification either. And if they hadn't fired all the career civil service professionals, they'd know that.
As I say here, there is no scientific justification to revoke the engagement finding. In fact, over the last 15+ yrs, the evidence of how climate change affects our health has only grown. Higher risk of allergies, dementia, fertility, heart disease, and death: that’s what’s on the line. @nature.org
There is No Scientific Justification to Revoke the Endangerment Finding
The U.S. EPA's decision to repeal the Endangerment Finding will limit the government's ability to regulate emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act.
www.nature.org
Trump posted a video depicting the first Black president and his wife as apes and his excuse for this is that it's a riff on The Lion King, a movie that does not feature any apes. Somehow this was a one-day story and we've already moved on.

*jaw drop*

My 9 yo's class has been learning about the Post Office this year and is looking to collect Valentines from all 50 states. These are the states we're missing so far. If you're from one of these states and want to help out, DM me and I'll get you the details. Thanks!

While Libertarians are busy trying to rehabilitate their reputation, bear in mind that they led the charge to repeal the Endangerment Finding

Schedule F has entered the chat
Running the government like a business…

www.wsj.com/politics/pol...

Reposted by James Goodwin

Running the government like a business…

www.wsj.com/politics/pol...

Can't get more "concise general statement" than nonexistent
Is there an actual reconsideration in the federal register or is the Trump administration deregulating by press release? I can’t seem to find it on EPA’s website.

People briefed on the endangerment finding repeal tell me that it's based on legal arguments only. It doesn't take aim at the actual science of warming.

The repeal could decimate federal climate policy -- if it survives legal challenge.

Reposted by James Goodwin

Is there an actual reconsideration in the federal register or is the Trump administration deregulating by press release? I can’t seem to find it on EPA’s website.

Reposted by James Goodwin

People briefed on the endangerment finding repeal tell me that it's based on legal arguments only. It doesn't take aim at the actual science of warming.

The repeal could decimate federal climate policy -- if it survives legal challenge.

As a bonus, forcing NGOs to do more enforcement work also means they can't sue agencies as much for failing to carry out nondiscretionary duties.

In case you're wondering why both Congress and conservatives in the judiciary are trying, in their own way, to block citizen suits news.bloomberglaw.com/environment-...
Fears of EPA Enforcement Dip Spurs Groups to Act as Legal Hounds
Environmental groups say they’re feeling pressure to file more lawsuits against corporate polluters amid concerns the Trump administration is leaving a gap by not policing violators hard enough.
news.bloomberglaw.com

"'The new and improved Supreme Court has helped tremendously”... said Myron Ebell.... 'I think a lot of people felt that in [Trump’s first term] that they couldn't actually win at the Supreme Court level.'” Just as the Founders envisioned! www.eenews.net/articles/tru...
Trump guts basis for climate regulation, setting up a courtroom clash
EPA has chucked the long-standing finding that greenhouse gas emissions drive climate change, drawing promises of lawsuits from environmentalists and
www.eenews.net

Wait til DOGE hears about this
www.nytimes.com/2026/02/11/c...
Trump Orders the Pentagon to Buy More Coal-Fired Electricity
www.nytimes.com

58 years later Sidney would have a memorable role in 'Beetlejuice.' Legend.
FIVE MINUTES FROM THE STATION (1930) — 7:45 pm ET — 13m
(TCM Extras)

Sylvia Sidney, Lynne Overman, Berton Churchill; directed by Arthur Hurley

A man brings his boss home to dinner hoping it will get him a promotion.

#TCM #TCMParty
Five Minutes from the Station (1930)
www.tcm.com

Reposted by James Goodwin

FIVE MINUTES FROM THE STATION (1930) — 7:45 pm ET — 13m
(TCM Extras)

Sylvia Sidney, Lynne Overman, Berton Churchill; directed by Arthur Hurley

A man brings his boss home to dinner hoping it will get him a promotion.

#TCM #TCMParty
Five Minutes from the Station (1930)
www.tcm.com

Murray is right on that one

*epic bong rip* I don't know. Just seems too far fetched. *coughing fit*

Those are words organized into sentences.

For the Supreme Court, settled expectations are sometimes outcome determinative and sometimes not. Wonder where they'd come down on this one.
cool, cool. so we are sort of like citizens, but not really?

It also should -- but it won't -- insult the Supreme Court's conservatives.

A not small portion of the Trump administration's policy agenda rests on "the composition of the Supreme Court is different now" for its main justification. That alone should outrage any constitution-loving American.
legal-planet.org/2026/02/12/h...
Hot Take on the Endangerment Repeal - Legal Planet
EPA's Endangerment Finding repeal is a thinly veiled effort to overturn a 2007 Supreme Court case. It doesn't even try to contest the science.
legal-planet.org

The really nutty thing is that the entire justification for the revocation is grounded in (a misreading of) law, and has *nothing* to do with science. Beam me up.
Revokes scientific finding
BREAKING: The EPA revokes scientific finding that greenhouse gases endanger the public health, removing a key basis for the climate change fight.