James Goodwin
banner
jamesgoodwin.bsky.social
James Goodwin
@jamesgoodwin.bsky.social
I'm Policy Director at @progressivereform.bsky.social where I specialize in federal regulatory policy. When not analyzing federal regulatory policy, I enjoy silent film, soccer, and running.

"Oh! I'm sorry! This is abuse."
Pinned
Now that we're staring down the barrel of Project 2025, I guess it's a good time to re-up this essay I wrote a few months ago exploring its plans for an authoritarian administrative state www.bostonreview.net/articles/ins...
Inside Project 2025 - Boston Review
Backed by the Heritage Foundation, the initiative seeks to undermine longstanding safeguards against abuses of executive power.
www.bostonreview.net
There's no legal or economic justification either. And if they hadn't fired all the career civil service professionals, they'd know that.
As I say here, there is no scientific justification to revoke the engagement finding. In fact, over the last 15+ yrs, the evidence of how climate change affects our health has only grown. Higher risk of allergies, dementia, fertility, heart disease, and death: that’s what’s on the line. @nature.org
There is No Scientific Justification to Revoke the Endangerment Finding
The U.S. EPA's decision to repeal the Endangerment Finding will limit the government's ability to regulate emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act.
www.nature.org
February 13, 2026 at 3:38 AM
Reposted by James Goodwin
Trump posted a video depicting the first Black president and his wife as apes and his excuse for this is that it's a riff on The Lion King, a movie that does not feature any apes. Somehow this was a one-day story and we've already moved on.
February 13, 2026 at 3:30 AM
*jaw drop*
February 13, 2026 at 3:14 AM
My 9 yo's class has been learning about the Post Office this year and is looking to collect Valentines from all 50 states. These are the states we're missing so far. If you're from one of these states and want to help out, DM me and I'll get you the details. Thanks!
February 13, 2026 at 3:13 AM
While Libertarians are busy trying to rehabilitate their reputation, bear in mind that they led the charge to repeal the Endangerment Finding
February 13, 2026 at 2:45 AM
Schedule F has entered the chat
Running the government like a business…

www.wsj.com/politics/pol...
February 13, 2026 at 2:38 AM
Can't get more "concise general statement" than nonexistent
Is there an actual reconsideration in the federal register or is the Trump administration deregulating by press release? I can’t seem to find it on EPA’s website.
February 13, 2026 at 1:23 AM
People briefed on the endangerment finding repeal tell me that it's based on legal arguments only. It doesn't take aim at the actual science of warming.

The repeal could decimate federal climate policy -- if it survives legal challenge.
February 13, 2026 at 1:08 AM
As a bonus, forcing NGOs to do more enforcement work also means they can't sue agencies as much for failing to carry out nondiscretionary duties.
February 13, 2026 at 12:52 AM
In case you're wondering why both Congress and conservatives in the judiciary are trying, in their own way, to block citizen suits news.bloomberglaw.com/environment-...
Fears of EPA Enforcement Dip Spurs Groups to Act as Legal Hounds
Environmental groups say they’re feeling pressure to file more lawsuits against corporate polluters amid concerns the Trump administration is leaving a gap by not policing violators hard enough.
news.bloomberglaw.com
February 13, 2026 at 12:46 AM
"'The new and improved Supreme Court has helped tremendously”... said Myron Ebell.... 'I think a lot of people felt that in [Trump’s first term] that they couldn't actually win at the Supreme Court level.'” Just as the Founders envisioned! www.eenews.net/articles/tru...
Trump guts basis for climate regulation, setting up a courtroom clash
EPA has chucked the long-standing finding that greenhouse gas emissions drive climate change, drawing promises of lawsuits from environmentalists and
www.eenews.net
February 13, 2026 at 12:33 AM
Wait til DOGE hears about this
www.nytimes.com/2026/02/11/c...
Trump Orders the Pentagon to Buy More Coal-Fired Electricity
www.nytimes.com
February 13, 2026 at 12:23 AM
58 years later Sidney would have a memorable role in 'Beetlejuice.' Legend.
FIVE MINUTES FROM THE STATION (1930) — 7:45 pm ET — 13m
(TCM Extras)

Sylvia Sidney, Lynne Overman, Berton Churchill; directed by Arthur Hurley

A man brings his boss home to dinner hoping it will get him a promotion.

#TCM #TCMParty
Five Minutes from the Station (1930)
www.tcm.com
February 13, 2026 at 12:19 AM
Murray is right on that one
February 13, 2026 at 12:13 AM
Reposted by James Goodwin
I see no reason not to look at the online gambling and prediction market craze as a new opioids crisis.

It will wreak havoc on lower-income Americans and leave a trail of destruction and despair in its wake.

The companies are just Purdue Pharma 2.0

www.liberalcurrents.com/from-pill-mi...
From Pill Mills to Prop Bets: Prediction Markets and Mobile Sports Betting Apps Are Fueling America’s Next Addiction Crisis
Against the gamblification of the world.
www.liberalcurrents.com
February 12, 2026 at 3:00 PM
*epic bong rip* I don't know. Just seems too far fetched. *coughing fit*
February 13, 2026 at 12:11 AM
Reposted by James Goodwin
The history books will remember this one
Breaking News: The Trump administration repealed the bedrock scientific finding that greenhouse gases threaten human life and well being, meaning that the EPA can no longer regulate them. nyti.ms/4rSszQu
February 12, 2026 at 11:04 PM
Those are words organized into sentences.
February 13, 2026 at 12:05 AM
For the Supreme Court, settled expectations are sometimes outcome determinative and sometimes not. Wonder where they'd come down on this one.
cool, cool. so we are sort of like citizens, but not really?
February 13, 2026 at 12:03 AM
It also should -- but it won't -- insult the Supreme Court's conservatives.
February 12, 2026 at 11:56 PM
A not small portion of the Trump administration's policy agenda rests on "the composition of the Supreme Court is different now" for its main justification. That alone should outrage any constitution-loving American.
legal-planet.org/2026/02/12/h...
Hot Take on the Endangerment Repeal - Legal Planet
EPA's Endangerment Finding repeal is a thinly veiled effort to overturn a 2007 Supreme Court case. It doesn't even try to contest the science.
legal-planet.org
February 12, 2026 at 11:53 PM
The really nutty thing is that the entire justification for the revocation is grounded in (a misreading of) law, and has *nothing* to do with science. Beam me up.
Revokes scientific finding
BREAKING: The EPA revokes scientific finding that greenhouse gases endanger the public health, removing a key basis for the climate change fight.
February 12, 2026 at 11:40 PM
The "market" has spoken loud and clear: Women do not want to marry conservative men. It would be inappropriate for the government to interfere in that. Otherwise, we might end up with a socially undesirable amount of shitty conservative men.
February 12, 2026 at 11:37 PM
Reposted by James Goodwin
So, has anyone out there actually seen the text of the endangerment finding rollback? Because they haven't put it out. And I'm told Zeldin might not even have signed it yet?

on Signal at jchemnick.01
February 12, 2026 at 10:35 PM