Kent Duston
@kentduston.bsky.social
740 followers 890 following 1.6K posts
Walking the fine line between cool and dorky in Aotearoa New Zealand. Also: left-leaning neurodiverse ADHD Boomer, tangata Tiriti, LGBTQIA+ ally, spending my professional life working on wellbeing - and Toitū te Tiriti, dammit
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
kentduston.bsky.social
Well sure - but how to people in Ōpōtiki get their groceries if they can’t drive?
kentduston.bsky.social
I don’t know why you’re continuing to bang this drum. Literally no-one - not the regulators, not the politicians, not the wider sector - agrees with you
kentduston.bsky.social
Yes, you’re right … but imagine living in Ōpōtiki and being told you’re no longer allowed to drive. How do you even get groceries? We’ve built a transport system where we have to give people licenses because there’s literally no alternative, which is nuts
kentduston.bsky.social
Despite the many merits of the idea, we’d have to take account of the fact that the vast majority of NZers outside the main centres would have no way to get to work or school or anywhere else without driving, because there are no PT options
kentduston.bsky.social
For the record, the study and the supporting economic analysis concluded the four Aussie-owned banks constitute an oligopoly with low levels of competition and exceptionally high profits
kentduston.bsky.social
You’re just rehashing the same tired arguments made in the ComCom market study, which were completely discredited:

www.comcom.govt.nz/regulated-in...
Market study into personal banking services | Commerce Commission
www.comcom.govt.nz
kentduston.bsky.social
But it’s not a competitive market, as both the Commerce Commission’s year long study into personal banking and the full Select Committee inquiry concluded. Or is that something else you’re not aware of?
kentduston.bsky.social
That’s an impressive piece of historical revisionism … because RBNZ only started the process in 2019. So why were the NIMs in NZ some 50% higher than across the Tasman for all of the preceding decade? Is it because the Aussie-owned banks are rapacious parasites?
kentduston.bsky.social
So explain to me why the NIM in AoNZ is 2.6% when it’s only 1.7% for the identical bank in Australia, other than profiteering
kentduston.bsky.social
In our OIA requests around the MODA, it’s become apparent that there was political will to replace the legislation after the Law Commission report - but it appears Ministry of Health officials really didn’t want to do the work, so killed all progress
kentduston.bsky.social
Alternatively, convener -at- aroreretini -dot- nz
kentduston.bsky.social
Superb and totally on-point cartoon, Sharon
kentduston.bsky.social
Unfortunately, that’s not what the Commerce Commission nor the Select Committee found in their respective inquiries into banking. There are high barriers to entry, negligible competition, and very high margins - largely thanks to RBNZ protecting the Aussie-owned banks
kentduston.bsky.social
As it turns out, it wasn’t the Minister that killed it - that was done by MoH officials, who decided the Therapeutic Products Bill would suffice. And the last document has a hand-written note from the Minister saying he’s not happy with that, and requiring a meeting
kentduston.bsky.social
These companies seem to be hallucinating shareholder value in the same way their products are hallucinating answers to basic questions. Although the phrase circle-jerk does rather come to mind
kentduston.bsky.social
DM me and I’ll send you all the sordid details
kentduston.bsky.social
And I have all the OIA-generated receipts for how Ministry of Health officials stalled and then killed the repeal and replacement of the MoDA following the Law Commission review, if you’re interested
kentduston.bsky.social
Currently, they’re holding us for ransom for Australian landlords and Australian tobacco companies, as everyone who can leave gets on a plane and does so
kentduston.bsky.social
As OCR rates have come down, bank net interest margins have gone up - the OCR is at 2.5% and the NIM is at 2.6%. As a point of comparison, in Aussie the NIM is about 1.7%. So - as you say - mortgage rates are about 1% too high, solely due to profiteering
kentduston.bsky.social
It’d be great to catch up!
kentduston.bsky.social
This is the sort of policy that can only exist at the nexus of power, incompetence, and bad faith
kentduston.bsky.social
Not anywhere near Otago, but DM me when you’re Auckland-bound so we can catch up
kentduston.bsky.social
Also: I’d love to figure out what the correct citation approach is when I quote your stuff in Serious Documents 😂
kentduston.bsky.social
In the short term, take the excess dividends off the banks and the gentailers and use the proceeds to install solar PV+battery systems on every house in the country.

People pretend this stuff is hard and complex when in fact it’s a piece of piss