▪️Ukraine may be ready to limit the size of its army to 600,000 personnel.
If the latter were not so heavily invested in the United States, US credibility would have evaporated by now.
If the latter were not so heavily invested in the United States, US credibility would have evaporated by now.
www.aftenposten.no/meninger/kro...
www.aftenposten.no/meninger/kro...
The key message: the structure and components of an agreement matters. Political will is necessary, but probably not sufficient. 🧵
www.rand.org/pubs/researc...
The key message: the structure and components of an agreement matters. Political will is necessary, but probably not sufficient. 🧵
www.rand.org/pubs/researc...
"When Grok is wrong: The risks of AI chatbots spreading misinformation in a crisis," by @kjolvegeland.bsky.social.
"When Grok is wrong: The risks of AI chatbots spreading misinformation in a crisis," by @kjolvegeland.bsky.social.
"When Grok is wrong: The risks of AI chatbots spreading misinformation in a crisis," by @kjolvegeland.bsky.social.
thebulletin.org/2025/06/when...
Thanks to @erc.europa.eu and @belfercenter.bsky.social ‘Rethinking Nuclear Deterrence’ program for the support. academic.oup.com/isr/article/...
US: "Please, take care of your defense yourself!"
EU: "Alright, we will build up our European defense industry and only buy European!"
US: "NOOO, NOT LIKE THAT!"
It will be interesting to see how this plays out this time, now that the US's reputation in Europe is in the toilet.
US: "Please, take care of your defense yourself!"
EU: "Alright, we will build up our European defense industry and only buy European!"
US: "NOOO, NOT LIKE THAT!"
It will be interesting to see how this plays out this time, now that the US's reputation in Europe is in the toilet.
Thanks to @erc.europa.eu and @belfercenter.bsky.social ‘Rethinking Nuclear Deterrence’ program for the support. academic.oup.com/isr/article/...
Thanks to @erc.europa.eu and @belfercenter.bsky.social ‘Rethinking Nuclear Deterrence’ program for the support. academic.oup.com/isr/article/...
t.co/qWVqDQRFmT
t.co/qWVqDQRFmT
It's simple:
1. There won't be a European nuclear deterrence, as long as there is no true political union - so, very unlikely.
2. National nuclear programs will take too long and consume ressources badly needed for conventional defense.
It's simple:
1. There won't be a European nuclear deterrence, as long as there is no true political union - so, very unlikely.
2. National nuclear programs will take too long and consume ressources badly needed for conventional defense.
open.substack.com/pub/goodalla...
journals.sagepub.com/eprint/ZRWZR...
journals.sagepub.com/eprint/ZRWZR...
www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
www.cambridge.org/core/journal...