(((Maestro Noxious)))
@knocksious.bsky.social
OGNT. #NOFEAR 2Tim. 3:16-17, 1Peter 4:12-17
Antioch over Alexandria. Non-creedal. Non-liturgical. Anti-determinist. Radical Reformationist.
I am as far beyond mutants as they are beyond you. My magic is never giving up. Do you even listen to yourself?
Antioch over Alexandria. Non-creedal. Non-liturgical. Anti-determinist. Radical Reformationist.
I am as far beyond mutants as they are beyond you. My magic is never giving up. Do you even listen to yourself?
Pinned
Ari Cohn getting attacked for defending the first ammendment is nonsense.
November 26, 2025 at 4:50 AM
Ari Cohn getting attacked for defending the first ammendment is nonsense.
Reposted by (((Maestro Noxious)))
Alejandra Caraballo: I need to be nicer to people.
Also Alejandra: I disagree with you on whether a policy was written unconstitutionally broadly, so I am going to tell the world you WANT trans kids to be bullied and kill themselves.
What a remarkably dishonest, awful human being.
Also Alejandra: I disagree with you on whether a policy was written unconstitutionally broadly, so I am going to tell the world you WANT trans kids to be bullied and kill themselves.
What a remarkably dishonest, awful human being.
November 25, 2025 at 3:20 PM
Alejandra Caraballo: I need to be nicer to people.
Also Alejandra: I disagree with you on whether a policy was written unconstitutionally broadly, so I am going to tell the world you WANT trans kids to be bullied and kill themselves.
What a remarkably dishonest, awful human being.
Also Alejandra: I disagree with you on whether a policy was written unconstitutionally broadly, so I am going to tell the world you WANT trans kids to be bullied and kill themselves.
What a remarkably dishonest, awful human being.
Negative, ghostrider
"dort is friends with dc draino" you bolt awake in new york. you are not online. it is 1776. you are george washington, and you have changed your mind. the future cannot come to pass. the colonies must burn
November 26, 2025 at 12:00 AM
Negative, ghostrider
Thread
I wish I didn’t have to share this. But the BBC has decided to censor my first Reith Lecture.
They deleted the line in which I describe Donald Trump as “the most openly corrupt president in American history.” /1
They deleted the line in which I describe Donald Trump as “the most openly corrupt president in American history.” /1
November 25, 2025 at 12:41 PM
Thread
Wait... do you guys *not* do this when you try on pants?
when trying on pants, do this in the store. then tell the sales associate "the menswear guy told me to do this."
IG mr.funkys0ul
IG mr.funkys0ul
November 25, 2025 at 12:39 PM
Wait... do you guys *not* do this when you try on pants?
I feel like "He's the Antichrist" folks and "I know the date of the rapture" folks are two sides of the same coin.
NEW: Peter Thiel, JD Vance’s top donor and one of Silicon Valley’s most powerful men, recently called Pope Leo XIV a tool of the Antichrist — and directly told the vice president not to listen to him.
NEW: JD Vance’s Top Donor Suggests Pope Leo XIV is Antichrist
In a leaked lecture, Peter Thiel says he’s urged Vance to ignore the pope on moral questions — and simply pray for him.
www.thelettersfromleo.com
November 25, 2025 at 12:35 PM
I feel like "He's the Antichrist" folks and "I know the date of the rapture" folks are two sides of the same coin.
Reposted by (((Maestro Noxious)))
A) No one finds 'I kept my underwear on' Dershowitz compelling.
B) Loesch is kind of like common household vermin. You may be able to convince yourself they're gone, but as soon as you turn on a light they appear again seemingly out of nowhere.
B) Loesch is kind of like common household vermin. You may be able to convince yourself they're gone, but as soon as you turn on a light they appear again seemingly out of nowhere.
"elevate charismatic figures such as Alan Dershowitz"
-____________-
-____________-
November 25, 2025 at 11:33 AM
A) No one finds 'I kept my underwear on' Dershowitz compelling.
B) Loesch is kind of like common household vermin. You may be able to convince yourself they're gone, but as soon as you turn on a light they appear again seemingly out of nowhere.
B) Loesch is kind of like common household vermin. You may be able to convince yourself they're gone, but as soon as you turn on a light they appear again seemingly out of nowhere.
Reposted by (((Maestro Noxious)))
"elevate charismatic figures such as Alan Dershowitz"
-____________-
-____________-
November 25, 2025 at 3:37 AM
"elevate charismatic figures such as Alan Dershowitz"
-____________-
-____________-
Reposted by (((Maestro Noxious)))
November 25, 2025 at 12:20 AM
Reposted by (((Maestro Noxious)))
Ok. I’ll go: As I was trained and trained others, US military service members are legally, morally, & ethically obligated to refuse to follow unlawful orders.
Doing so is high risk, as it is a de facto case of guilty until proven innocent — but it is a duty to refuse to follow them all the same.
Doing so is high risk, as it is a de facto case of guilty until proven innocent — but it is a duty to refuse to follow them all the same.
November 24, 2025 at 11:01 PM
Ok. I’ll go: As I was trained and trained others, US military service members are legally, morally, & ethically obligated to refuse to follow unlawful orders.
Doing so is high risk, as it is a de facto case of guilty until proven innocent — but it is a duty to refuse to follow them all the same.
Doing so is high risk, as it is a de facto case of guilty until proven innocent — but it is a duty to refuse to follow them all the same.
Never trust a person that says things like "It was good (for star wars).
November 24, 2025 at 8:27 PM
Never trust a person that says things like "It was good (for star wars).
Reposted by (((Maestro Noxious)))
That’s not the oath.
BLITZER: I want to be precise. Should members of the US military obey clearly illegal orders?
McCLAIN: You're asking an enlisted person for their opinion on what they think is legal. That's a pretty slippery slope. Follow your commander in chief. That's the oath that you took
(Not a no!)
McCLAIN: You're asking an enlisted person for their opinion on what they think is legal. That's a pretty slippery slope. Follow your commander in chief. That's the oath that you took
(Not a no!)
November 24, 2025 at 8:21 PM
That’s not the oath.
Sounds like an even stronger argument for relocation, tbh. Almost like folks are affirmatively choosing to stay in a place where they hafta put up with this because they *like* that place, which is fine and their perogative. Also, smells like opportunity for an enterprising developer.
Among other things, a problem we see with this approach in San Diego is that forcing a lot of workers in a big city to live 50 miles away from their jobs eventually turns their 60 minute commutes into 120 minute commutes because our roads get clogged with cars bsky.app/profile/knoc...
As a rural guy, I call 'living an hour away from where the jobs are' a typical Tuesday. And I understand that that is my choice. There are places I could move that would put me closer to places where there is work. I don't see anyone throwing a fit that I have an hour commute. Why is this different?
November 24, 2025 at 8:22 PM
Sounds like an even stronger argument for relocation, tbh. Almost like folks are affirmatively choosing to stay in a place where they hafta put up with this because they *like* that place, which is fine and their perogative. Also, smells like opportunity for an enterprising developer.
Reposted by (((Maestro Noxious)))
'we are taking on credit card debt for our Disneyland vacation' is a very different thing from 'we are taking on credit card debt for food.' And in this specific case, for instance, the average family of four does not pay or need to pay $32,000 for childcare!
November 24, 2025 at 3:27 PM
'we are taking on credit card debt for our Disneyland vacation' is a very different thing from 'we are taking on credit card debt for food.' And in this specific case, for instance, the average family of four does not pay or need to pay $32,000 for childcare!
Reposted by (((Maestro Noxious)))
this is really not true, unless we're defining precarity all the way down.
November 24, 2025 at 3:17 PM
this is really not true, unless we're defining precarity all the way down.
As a rural guy, I call 'living an hour away from where the jobs are' a typical Tuesday. And I understand that that is my choice. There are places I could move that would put me closer to places where there is work. I don't see anyone throwing a fit that I have an hour commute. Why is this different?
Right the dynamic here in San Diego is that you can live a perfectly normal middle-class life on $100k/year here... if you bought your house 15 years ago or otherwise have some sort of housing hookup like a subsidized BMR unit.
Other option is to live an hour+ away from where the jobs are
Other option is to live an hour+ away from where the jobs are
Even in San Diego, a family making 136k a year isn’t exactly working class, much less living in poverty! There are many, many people making much less than that
November 24, 2025 at 8:01 PM
As a rural guy, I call 'living an hour away from where the jobs are' a typical Tuesday. And I understand that that is my choice. There are places I could move that would put me closer to places where there is work. I don't see anyone throwing a fit that I have an hour commute. Why is this different?
Reposted by (((Maestro Noxious)))
The same people who think they are being censored when people don’t want to invite them to parties.
Lisa McClain refuses to unequivocally condemn threats of violence against Democratic members of Congress who Trump said should be put to death, and says, "there are consequences. You can have freedom of speech, but freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequences."
November 24, 2025 at 3:37 PM
The same people who think they are being censored when people don’t want to invite them to parties.
Reposted by (((Maestro Noxious)))
If you want the kind of power you get over other people by being a cop OR A POLITICIAN, your right to privacy should be severely curtailed. You should live under a microscope. It’s the price you pay for power.
Cops and prison guards need to be tracked and video recorded at all times. We have the technology to do this and weirdly...
November 24, 2025 at 3:13 PM
If you want the kind of power you get over other people by being a cop OR A POLITICIAN, your right to privacy should be severely curtailed. You should live under a microscope. It’s the price you pay for power.
Fact check: True
Just a PSA to the men out there who are mad about not getting what they want in this world: Being a man is like playing life on easy or at most normal difficulty, you need to get your shit together, the world is not against you because you're a man
“we need to be nicer to men” bro they didn’t let women have their own credit cards til 50 years ago
November 24, 2025 at 6:08 AM
Fact check: True
It seems like Joe *gets it*
I’m curious what you think that “just one script” is?
Along those lines I’d argue that men who think “there’s one script” would be the type that want there to be a binary way “to be a man” and rage when it’s not easy or just given to them.
Along those lines I’d argue that men who think “there’s one script” would be the type that want there to be a binary way “to be a man” and rage when it’s not easy or just given to them.
November 24, 2025 at 6:07 AM
It seems like Joe *gets it*
This whole 'society' thing sounds like a drag.
Glad I'm not part of it.
Glad I'm not part of it.
To my mind, I think the core of the problem is that greater - if still imperfect - gender equality allowed women access to more 'life scripts' as it were, but society mostly still presents men with just one script and that script poorly and incompletely.
So some men are fine and many are adrift.
So some men are fine and many are adrift.
November 24, 2025 at 6:04 AM
This whole 'society' thing sounds like a drag.
Glad I'm not part of it.
Glad I'm not part of it.
Reposted by (((Maestro Noxious)))
FWIW, RUMINT, but pretty reliable:
1. Vance key to US embrace of Russia plan on Ukraine, Rubio (and even Trump) out of the loop.
2. Vance-Rubio relations “awful.”
3. Rubio told the senators exactly what they said he told them.
4. Hegseth paranoid he’ll be shoved out, Driscoll will replace him.
1. Vance key to US embrace of Russia plan on Ukraine, Rubio (and even Trump) out of the loop.
2. Vance-Rubio relations “awful.”
3. Rubio told the senators exactly what they said he told them.
4. Hegseth paranoid he’ll be shoved out, Driscoll will replace him.
November 23, 2025 at 2:32 PM
FWIW, RUMINT, but pretty reliable:
1. Vance key to US embrace of Russia plan on Ukraine, Rubio (and even Trump) out of the loop.
2. Vance-Rubio relations “awful.”
3. Rubio told the senators exactly what they said he told them.
4. Hegseth paranoid he’ll be shoved out, Driscoll will replace him.
1. Vance key to US embrace of Russia plan on Ukraine, Rubio (and even Trump) out of the loop.
2. Vance-Rubio relations “awful.”
3. Rubio told the senators exactly what they said he told them.
4. Hegseth paranoid he’ll be shoved out, Driscoll will replace him.
Reposted by (((Maestro Noxious)))
No, Biden was not "like" Trump in a y way shape or form, Senator Slotkin, including and especially in his prudent and effective economic policies, which Trump has upended.
Slotkin: "He's trying to distract us from the big stories of last week, the Epstein files and economy. He's tweeting 'the economy is the best it's ever been' -- amazing considering the public isn't stupid. It reminded me of Joe Biden. Biden tried to tell us for a year that the economy was great."
November 23, 2025 at 4:03 PM
No, Biden was not "like" Trump in a y way shape or form, Senator Slotkin, including and especially in his prudent and effective economic policies, which Trump has upended.