Mariel Goddu
@marielgoddu.bsky.social
850 followers 1.4K following 320 posts
Philosophy of learning, evolution, & development, but make it metaphysics. It‘s not a point of view, it’s a point of *do*. Cognition is like digestion. Plant I > AI. Phil of Mind = Phil of Biology. https://philosophy.stanford.edu/people/mariel-goddu
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
marielgoddu.bsky.social
Fall Term 2025 (Sept 22-Dec 12)
-Teaching Assistant, Mathematical Logic
-Epistemology
-Proseminar
-Paper: "Intuitive physics is for action"
marielgoddu.bsky.social
Summer Term 2025 (June 16-Sept 22):
-Paper: "Intuitive physics is for action"
-Chapter: "Toward a 5E (evolutionary) cognition"
-Essay: "How to assemble a consciousness"
-German: C1.1/C1.2
June 🇺🇸 |July 🇩🇪 | August 🇺🇸
marielgoddu.bsky.social
Spring Term 2025 (March 31-June 11):
-Modal Logic
-Merleau-Ponty
-Soc. & Pol. Philosophy of Language
-Teaching Methods in Philosophy
-Writing (ongoing): "Intuitive Physics is for Action"; "Cognitive Ontology through the Lens of Biology"
marielgoddu.bsky.social
&Here’s the full TOC of this extremely rad volume:
marielgoddu.bsky.social
Our chapter on cognitive homologies *in print* ! 🤩
@beakr.bsky.social @gualtiero.bsky.social
Thread & link 🔗 below👇
Reposted by Mariel Goddu
daweibai.bsky.social
Happy to share that our BBS target article has been accepted: “Core Perception”: Re-imagining Precocious Reasoning as Sophisticated Perceiving
With Alon Hafri, @veroniqueizard.bsky.social, @chazfirestone.bsky.social & Brent Strickland
Read it here: doi.org/10.1017/S014...
A short thread [1/5]👇
marielgoddu.bsky.social
First day of 23rd grade 🚌
(2nd yr of 2nd PhD)

Annual reminder: It’s never too late to do what makes you happy!
Reposted by Mariel Goddu
marielgoddu.bsky.social
Check out our chapter (led by @beakr.bsky.social) on cognitive ontology here! : philpapers.org/archive/KRIC...

We propose a developmental approach to 'cognitive homologies' –– (cognitive capacities that are "the same across species") –– as a means for carving up cognition.

Our approach adopts...
marielgoddu.bsky.social
Fall Term 2025 (Sept 22-Dec 12)
-Teaching Assistant, Mathematical Logic
-Epistemology
-Proseminar
-Paper: "Intuitive physics is for action"
marielgoddu.bsky.social
Summer Term 2025 (June 16-Sept 22):
-Paper: "Intuitive physics is for action"
-Chapter: "Toward a 5E (evolutionary) cognition"
-Essay: "How to assemble a consciousness"
-German: C1.1/C1.2
June 🇺🇸 |July 🇩🇪 | August 🇺🇸
marielgoddu.bsky.social
Spring Term 2025 (March 31-June 11):
-Modal Logic
-Merleau-Ponty
-Soc. & Pol. Philosophy of Language
-Teaching Methods in Philosophy
-Writing (ongoing): "Intuitive Physics is for Action"; "Cognitive Ontology through the Lens of Biology"
marielgoddu.bsky.social
the approach because it offers a novel route to identifying/categorizing cognitive capacities in a way that's more in line with evolutionary biology & relies less on anthropocentric categories grounded in human introspection.

Here's to connecting cognitive science with the life sciences!

8/8
marielgoddu.bsky.social
which we are starting to address in a sequel chapter (stay tuned!)

This (current) chapter provides a few proof-of-concept examples, such as the (arguably) homologous development of episodic memory in various infant mammals.

While there's still a lot to be worked out, we're excited about

7/
marielgoddu.bsky.social
cognitive character identity mechanisms are different from ChIMs for morphological traits: much of cognitive development occurs *postnatally*.

This means that cognitive ChIMs frequently involve the organism's own goal-directed behavior!

This raises a lot of interesting puzzles, some of

6/
marielgoddu.bsky.social
Our account of 'cognitive homologies' adopts this developmental approach to *COGNITIVE* traits.

We argue that cognitive capacities can be individuated (and thus identified across species) in terms of the developmental mechanisms that give rise to them: *cognitive* ChIMs!

But crucially,

5/
marielgoddu.bsky.social
are highly complex and causally non-redundant, they're extremely important for typical trait development –– & thus are conserved through evolution.

(Mess up a ChIM, and you mess up a whole trait: a body part might fail to grow, for example –– or grow in the wrong place!)

4/
marielgoddu.bsky.social
distinctive causal profile: they have a "bowtie" 🎀 causal structure, wherein variable inputs are processed through a single node to produce a variety of outputs.

(A nice analysis of 🎀s from @laurennross.bsky.social here:
core.ac.uk/download/pdf...)

Since ChIMS (Character Identity Mechanisms)

3/
core.ac.uk
marielgoddu.bsky.social
Check out our chapter (led by @beakr.bsky.social) on cognitive ontology here! : philpapers.org/archive/KRIC...

We propose a developmental approach to 'cognitive homologies' –– (cognitive capacities that are "the same across species") –– as a means for carving up cognition.

Our approach adopts...
marielgoddu.bsky.social
Oh boy! The plot thickens. (But that video though...)

I only need it as a proof-of-concept kind of example to gesture at ways people tend to characterize various non-human behaviors as "mechanical," "instinctual" or "autopilot", but I'll include your link as a "cf" in the footnote–– thanks!
marielgoddu.bsky.social
Update: it's the Great Golden Digger Wasp, the repetitive behavior is females' burrow inspection behavior, and the thing that prompts it is moving her prey

(h/t @evanwestra.bsky.social for that info & this video)

www.youtube.com/watch?si=gUN...
marielgoddu.bsky.social
HERO! Thank you!!
Also, this video is fantastic & 100% going in a footnote
marielgoddu.bsky.social
Does anyone know that famous spider[?] cognitive scientists always give as an example of "dumb" behavior––
something like, it makes a burrow, but then if you move a blade of grass in front of the hole it freaks out and rehearses the entire burrow-building routine again?

What creature is this!
marielgoddu.bsky.social
don’t develop a dogged focus on the implications of change on the mundane rhythms of everyday life —

the future will continue to feel distant, intangible and somehow ‘other,’ and this weakness may grow into a critical failure of our generation.”
marielgoddu.bsky.social
Nice thought piece re: visions of the human future (🎁 article)

www.nytimes.com/2025/08/16/o...

“If we don’t start thinking about the future as an extension of the present — and if we
Opinion | The Future Will Be Mundane
www.nytimes.com
Reposted by Mariel Goddu
steveesser.bsky.social
This is a fresh (to me) and apt perspective on this topic. Great work!
marielgoddu.bsky.social
Now out in @aimagazine.bsky.social -

Against "AI Welfare": Care Practices Should Prioritize Living Beings Over AI
philpapers.org/archive/DORA...
led by @johndorsch.bsky.social !

We propose a novel guideline, the “Precarity Guideline,” to sidestep protracted debates about AI consciousness. We

1/11
Left: an endangered biosystem (the Amazon rainforest), a child holding up a cardboard sign that says "I'm hungry", and 10 endangered species;
Center: a "greater than" sign;
Right: the supercomputer used to power ChatGPT
marielgoddu.bsky.social
3 weeks, 3000 miles
(*now accepting recs along this route!)
marielgoddu.bsky.social
general uncertainty — i.e., with respect to that exact lack of consensus.

PS Thanks so much for engaging here and with the piece !
marielgoddu.bsky.social
Again, my personal views are very much aligned with yours. But: I think there is much less theoretical consensus re: the “boundaries of sentience” than you assume!

So: general point agreed, re: not adopting inflated language - but I do think it’s right in this case to say that there IS profound,