Martiana ⁘ SARTRIX
@martiana.bsky.social
510 followers 930 following 340 posts
trans mulier perita sacrorum & litterarum SARTRIX.org
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Martiana ⁘ SARTRIX
Reposted by Martiana ⁘ SARTRIX
juergenzimmerer.bsky.social
I feel honored that @thediasporist.bsky.social found my article "Two kinds of Staatsräson" worthy of reprinting🙏
thediasporist.bsky.social
Read the latest analysis by Jürgen Zimmerer @juergenzimmerer.bsky.social on how Germany uses the Holocaust's singularity to limit responsibility for its colonial crimes (first published by @versobooks.bsky.social in "Hyper-Zionism. Germany, the Nazi Past and Israel": thediasporist.de/two-kinds-of...
Two Kinds of Staatsräson – the Diasporist
How Germany uses the singularity of the Holocaust to limit liability for its colonial crimes
thediasporist.de
martiana.bsky.social
Yeah, I don't even mean to knock heresy, I just think people ought to be heretics for the right reaons, not out of sheer ignorance and arrogance.
martiana.bsky.social
No, I don't think he would have said it was God's essence, or made any such distinction. What it sounded like to me was full-on anthropomorphism.
martiana.bsky.social
*even normal for Catholics, lol
martiana.bsky.social
I mean yes, but the visible nature of Jesus is not his divine nature, or so I would think. Maybe this is normal for Protestants, maybe it's even normal for Christians and I'm just not aware of it...
martiana.bsky.social
I mean I'm not an expert in Christianity, maybe I'm misapprehending things! But I heard a clip of him making that claim in a podcast that discussed this most recent rapture fad, and it seemed extremely out there to me. And I just keep noticing vocal Xians having VERY idiosyncratic beliefs.
martiana.bsky.social
Oh yeah, Rapture is recognized by Evangelics, I meant the idea that he has seen God with his "own eyes". I'm pretty sure that is widely considered a heretical notion -- certainly in the Catholic church, and I think it would have offended every patristic author I can think of.
martiana.bsky.social
E.g. the guy who made the September rapture prediction (admittedly a fringe guy but it went viral with Evangelicals!) claims he has seen God "with his own eyes", which is wildly unorthodox

(I guess he probably doesn't call himself a traditionalist, but in so many words)
martiana.bsky.social
Have people written about how Christian right "traditionalists" often loudly preach ideas that have been deemed heretical since antiquity? What is up with that?
martiana.bsky.social
17. Speaking of Latin pronunciation, I think it's actually great and a sign of intercultural heritage, not of eurocentrism, that we have Latinate names like Confucius, Averroes, Maimonides. As Edward Said wrote, the very notion that East and West are separate entities is an artifact of Orientalism.
martiana.bsky.social
16. Should final vowels before initial vowels simply be elided or should they be merged together (synaloephe)? Grammarians consistently teach complete elision, but the name they use for this is synaloephe. Also, they have a specific term for elision of vowel+M, ecthlipsis. I think we should use it!
martiana.bsky.social
Yeah, that is the case sometimes. Cf. Vergil "trahit sua quemque voluptas".
Reposted by Martiana ⁘ SARTRIX
mqassiti.bsky.social
#medievalsky, does anyone have some good suggestions for us?
@martiana.bsky.social
mqassiti.bsky.social
Very interesting thread, thank you!👍
What would be a good introduction/overview on the pronunciation differences between classical and medieval Latin?
martiana.bsky.social
It's probably because I just haven't looked into the medieval side enough, but I haven't really found a satisfying intro/overview yet. I'm also in relatively initial stages of research on this subject, my familiarity is mostly with the ancient grammarians themselves.
martiana.bsky.social
15. On that note, I really dislike the trend (I think especially in Anglophone scholars?) to use as little punctuation as possible, which I think reflects a kind of purism? When I compared a stretch of Vergil in modern editions vs a late antique codex, the ancient text used ca 2x as much punctuation
martiana.bsky.social
14. I think, to the extent possible, modern editions should reflect the transmitted punctuation, not just the sequence of letters. How ancient Vergil manuscripts are punctuated tells us something about (late antique) reading practices, while modern editors' punctuation "only" guides interpretation.
martiana.bsky.social
13. One reason I don't think nasalization of vowels was a normative feature of Latin is that I can't accept ancient grammarians ALL just failed to describe it in a recognizable way. They weren't remotely on the level of Sanskrit linguists, but they could describe co-articulation (namely of V in QV).
martiana.bsky.social
12. Pluralism in a tradition like Latin grammar functions in a complex way, where in principle, each authority demands to be followed, but in practice, they contradict each other so much that there is actually very substantial freedom. (This is also true of paganism!)
martiana.bsky.social
11. To say more about normativity: when Pompeius writes "we should not pronounce 'Titius' as we write it, but as 'Titsius'", I don't think that can be treated as merely evidence for the pronunciation of his day. He inscribed it into the grammatical tradition as a norm, which must be taken seriously.
martiana.bsky.social
Of course, yoo-way-nace is in its way as unclassical as joo-vee-nees, as it still accommodates itself the pronunciation to English phonology. Personally, I tend to stick to the traditional English pronunciation for all Greco-Roman names within English.