Megan McArdle
@mcmegan.bsky.social
1.1K followers 85 following 170 posts
Columnist, Bullmastiff Afficionado, Avid collector of kitchen gadgets
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Megan McArdle
bretdevereaux.bsky.social
It is an almost absurdly simple observation, but a great many pathologies in military policy come from the tendency to reason from values which were in the past or are merely thought to be now, connected to victory, rather than reasoning *from victory* itself as a goal.
Reposted by Megan McArdle
walterolson.bsky.social
All legal nonsense aside about the supposed state of armed conflict between the U.S. and Venezuelan gangs, what "I wish to emphasize is that there is a word for killings outside of armed conflict for which there is no domestic legal authority. That word is murder." [@benjaminwittes.lawfaremedia.org]
The Situation: Murder She Wrote
There's a word for what they're doing.
www.lawfaremedia.org
mcmegan.bsky.social
That tariffs are bad and the administration’s immigration policy is gratuitously brutal, or that democrats will find it harder than they’d like to restore the old policy equilibrium?
Reposted by Megan McArdle
nytimes.com
Breaking News: President Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said the military should use U.S. cities as “training grounds” at an unusual meeting focused on culture wars. It was unclear why they needed to gather senior military leaders from overseas to tell them this face to face.
Live Updates: Trump Addresses Rare Military Gathering as Government Shutdown Looms
nyti.ms
mcmegan.bsky.social
The good news is that it seems like they’re overpaying
Reposted by Megan McArdle
mcmegan.bsky.social
I barely post here, since I don't have many followers, and almost everything I say tends to attract unpleasant screaming.
mcmegan.bsky.social
"Let me be crystal clear: I was trying to rebut the argument that 'Well, these shows aren't doing so well anyway, who can say why he was taken off air', not endorse it. Carr's actions are dangerous to democratic norms and constitutional principle, unpatriotic and utterly indefensible."
mcmegan.bsky.social
Which is, of course, exactly the argument that was made for suppressing speech that might help Trump. Sigh.
mcmegan.bsky.social
To be clear, that doesn't mean this is the left's fault--Trump's authoritarian instincts are his own. But at least some of the people going along with it are doing so out of a conviction that the stakes are now existential and we can't afford the niceties.
mcmegan.bsky.social
Which means when you *do* win politically, you tell yourself you have to make it harder for them to regain political power and suppress your speech. And so the wheel goes round and round ...
mcmegan.bsky.social
I think it also raised the stakes--if your opponents are trying to make it impossible for you to make a bunch of arguments, that makes it harder for you to win politically.
Reposted by Megan McArdle
drewharwell.com
Today's decision being heavily criticized by Past Brendan Carr
Should the government censor speech it doesn’t like?  Of course not. 

The FCC does not have a roving mandate to police speech in the name of the “public interest.” Who, in your view, should have the power to draw the line between a “lie” and “free speech”?  Government officials that want to stay in political power or the people that can hold them accountable ? President Biden is right.

Political satire is one of the oldest and most important forms of free speech.

It challenges those in power while using humor to draw more people in to the discussion.

That’s why people in influential positions have always targeted it for censorship. Free speech is the counterweight—it is democracy’s check on government control.

That’s why censorship is the authoritarian’s dream.

After all, there’s a straight line from the soap box to the ballot box.  You retain freedom at both or neither.
Reposted by Megan McArdle
Reposted by Megan McArdle
whstancil.bsky.social
I think people would be extremely happy to accept the plain meaning of his words if they’d be clearly right-wing, but since they’re somewhat left-coded, those same people have retreated to arguing that on the internet everyone is a trickster elf who speaks in riddles all the time
butterfinger.bsky.social
You're being purposefully obtuse for someone who's Extremely Online.
Reposted by Megan McArdle
patterico.bsky.social
If you are a Free Speech Warrior angrily demanding the firing of anyone who criticizes both Charlie Kirk’s assassination and the views he expressed, you embody the very “cancel culture” that you pretended to decry—but which you always planned to employ against your own enemies.
Reposted by Megan McArdle
normative.bsky.social
Starting a podcast aimed at tiny dogs called “Your Ancestors Were Wolves.”
mcmegan.bsky.social
Boxing is even worse!
Reposted by Megan McArdle
normative.bsky.social
An entire government department has been derailed from its extremely valuable work and is now dedicated to validating the risible delusions of a single crackpot.
mcmegan.bsky.social
I think maybe Democrats are just bowing to the reality that a large number of voters just do not care about process norms and never have, cannot be made to care about them, and will find you somewhere between boring and infuriating if you try to make them care.
mcmegan.bsky.social
I wish I believed that voters can be persuaded by Democrats setting their hair on fire, but Democrats spent four years doing that 2016-2020, in concert with most of the professional class and ... he's president again, after denying the results of a legitimate election and inciting a riot.
Reposted by Megan McArdle
postopinions.bsky.social
"Those who believe in the value of neutral institutions must do everything they can now to protect the rule of law — and I’m afraid that doesn’t mean condemning just Trump."

The latest from @mcmegan.bsky.social:
Opinion | When the rule of law becomes rule of lawfare
Friday’s Bolton raid and the rebuke of Trump’s $500 million fine show what happens when justice is not impartial.
wapo.st