mdcmd.bsky.social
@mdcmd.bsky.social
980 followers 2.2K following 3.4K posts
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by mdcmd.bsky.social
Reposted by mdcmd.bsky.social
azdesertarch.bsky.social
Yes, unitary executive meant 1 President not 3 per discussions at the time. It has little to do with the current discussion.
Reposted by mdcmd.bsky.social
lewgoct.bsky.social
Plus, there's no originalist argument for unitary executive because the words do not exist to support the theory. They read something that's not there. It's ambiguous for a reason, so the powers can be tailored to the times.
Reposted by mdcmd.bsky.social
dsm1132.bsky.social
The idea that a president, sane or not, could dismantle entire edifices built by previous generations of congressmen and presidents WITHOUT congressional involvement amounts to government by one person's whim. That's the very definition of autocracy.
Reposted by mdcmd.bsky.social
micfarris.com
This reminds me of something you said in an interview with Chris Hayes on @allinwithchris.bsky.social nearly a year ago:

bsky.app/profile/micf...
micfarris.com
From @jamellebouie.net on @allinwithchris.bsky.social : "Any reading of any clause in the Constitution that essentially gives the President the prerogative of a king, that reading is wrong. It just is."
Reposted by mdcmd.bsky.social
micfarris.com
From @jamellebouie.net on @allinwithchris.bsky.social : "Any reading of any clause in the Constitution that essentially gives the President the prerogative of a king, that reading is wrong. It just is."
Reposted by mdcmd.bsky.social
jamellebouie.net
"The liberty and security of our fellow citizens is our great object, and not the prompt execution of the laws. Indecision, delay, blunders, nay villainous actions in the administration of government, are trifles compared to legalizing the full exertion of a tyrannical disposition."
Reposted by mdcmd.bsky.social
andycraig.bsky.social
Taft wrote some bad history in a mostly forgotten 1926 case about firing a local postmaster, Scalia turbocharged that in a cranky dissent in 1988 that no other justice joined, and now it's a Roberts Court article of faith even though it has zero textual basis and is built on pseudohistory.
jamellebouie.net
I read Caleb Nelson's piece on the removal power and I was taken with a reference he makes in the conclusion.
When the First Congress confronted the same ambiguities, more than one member warned against interpreting the Constitution in the expectation that all Presidents would have the sterling character of George Washington.  The current Supreme Court may likewise see itself as interpreting the Constitution for the ages, and perhaps some of the Justices take comfort in the idea that future Presidents will not all have the character of Donald Trump.  But the future is not guaranteed; a President bent on vengeful, destructive, and lawless behavior can do lasting damage to our norms and institutions.  As one member of Congress argued in 1789, we should not gravitate toward interpretations of the Constitution that “legaliz[e] the full exertion of a tyrannical disposition.”
Reposted by mdcmd.bsky.social
teapainusa.bsky.social
Trump: “What do I have to do to get into heaven?”

Preacher: “All you have to do is admit your mistakes and ask for forgiveness.”

Trump: “Looks like I’m going to Hell, then.”
Reposted by mdcmd.bsky.social
gtconway.bsky.social
... and into your bedchamber and on your bed, and into the houses of your servants and of your people, and into your ovens and your kneading bowls; the frogs shall come up on you and on your people and on all your servants.'"'"

— 𝘌𝘹𝘰𝘥𝘶𝘴 8:1–4 (RSVCE)
Reposted by mdcmd.bsky.social
gtconway.bsky.social
"Then the Lord said to Moses, 'Go in to Pharaoh and say to him, "Thus says the Lord, 'Let my people go, that they may serve me. But if you refuse to let them go, behold, I will plague all your country with frogs; the [Willamette River] shall swarm with frogs which shall come up into your house...
Reposted by mdcmd.bsky.social
thetnholler.bsky.social
Big roar for AG Letitia James at the ZOHRAN rally👇🏽
Reposted by mdcmd.bsky.social
ektaka.bsky.social
It is depraved indifference and also the ugly side of eugenics that would rather remove people with special needs from society completely. Who thought making someone with such an utter lack of humanity the POTUS was a good idea?
bambooshooti.bsky.social
#ResistanceUnited

Trump took advantage of the shutdown to gut the department that oversees special education for 7.5 million kids with disabilities. I guess he wants to go back to the time when special ed kids were warehoused in facilities or given no education at all.

www.npr.org/2025/10/13/n...
Amid shutdown, Trump administration guts department overseeing special education
Multiple sources tell NPR that, as part of the Trump administration's latest reduction-in-force, the U.S. Department of Education has gutted the office that handles special education.
www.npr.org
Reposted by mdcmd.bsky.social
meidastouch.com
Jordy: Republicans control every branch of government. Every day that passes with the gov shut down is another reminder that Trump and the GOP would rather protect pedos than ensure people have health care. Because once the government reopens, you know what’s coming—a vote on the Epstein files.
Reposted by mdcmd.bsky.social
garygifford.bsky.social
No Kings protest this Saturday is predicted to likely be the largest one day protest in US history. Wouldn't you like to be able to say you were there? Resisting is doing more than posting on social media!
Reposted by mdcmd.bsky.social
marcelias.bsky.social
Let's be clear: If North Carolina Republicans gerrymander their already illegal map further, they will be sued and they will lose.

I never bluff and I usually win.
marcelias.bsky.social
🚨BREAKING: North Carolina became the latest GOP-controlled state to announce it will gerrymander its congressional map to please President Donald Trump. www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/...
North Carolina Is Latest Gop-Controlled State To Announce a Gerrymander
Read more here.
www.democracydocket.com
Reposted by mdcmd.bsky.social
crockett.house.gov
Today we honor the rich history, culture, and resilience of Indigenous communities—past and present.

As we recognize Indigenous Peoples’ Day, let’s commit to telling the truth about our history, protecting sacred lands, and fighting for justice that includes everyone.

#IndigenousPeoplesDay
Reposted by mdcmd.bsky.social
brendannyhan.bsky.social
Remember we're already in a world of Kavanaugh stops based solely on ethnicity. If you are from a targeted group, this can happen to you no matter what your citizenship status is. What if you forget your wallet at home? You could end up in detention for days or worse.
brendannyhan.bsky.social
Do you want to live in a "papers, please" country?
Reposted by mdcmd.bsky.social
thebulwark.com
"I didn't know the president communicated with his cabinet officers via direct messages, but I bet you every intelligence agency worth its salt in the world already knew that." - @gtconway.bsky.social

Watch the latest George Explains with @sarahlongwell25.bsky.social right now
Reposted by mdcmd.bsky.social
nickkristof.bsky.social
In Portland, an ambulance was summoned to the ICE office to treat an injured protester (not clear how he was injured). But when the patient was loaded inside, ICE officers refused to let the ambulance leave and threatened to shoot the ambulance driver: www.wweek.com/news/2025/10...
Documents Allege a Federal Agent at Portland ICE Threatened to Shoot an Ambulance Driver
Feds delayed medics who had come to pick up an injured protester. Then, according to confidential incident reports, the agents became aggressive.
www.wweek.com