Aidan Trees
@proftrees.bsky.social
82 followers 230 following 280 posts
Socialism, Soccer, Seattle, Sandwiches
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Aidan Trees
djw172.bsky.social
Harrell's campaign is leaning hard on the "experience managing large, complex organizations" argument. And yet here's a story where SDOT ultimately follows its own policies and does the right thing, but *in spite of* Harrell's leadership, thanks to pressure from his opponent's activist organization.
Reposted by Aidan Trees
johnspacemuller.com
I don’t need much in life, just food, shelter, $30 million and three years to prove I’m a great manager of Manchester United
proftrees.bsky.social
Watching Harrell at debates is painful. This time a diff between the candidates I noticed is who they talk to. Harrell usually turns to the audience while Wilson usually speaks to the moderators.

Harrell grand stands to a crowd while Wilson talks to people in front of a crowd.
ericacbarnett.bsky.social
I'm sitting in the auditorium at Seattle University, watching the KOMO-sponsored debate with moderators Joni Balter and Chris Daniels. Loving that the audience seems to be largely students!
Reposted by Aidan Trees
ericacbarnett.bsky.social
Balter asks the crowd, which clapped and snapped when Wilson noted that his campaign is being funded by big corporations, to be quiet—for the second time. Lots of side-eye at that.
Reposted by Aidan Trees
davidseater.com
Bruce Harrell continues to make the case for voting himself out. He's been in elected office in Seattle for nearly 20 years!
ericacbarnett.bsky.social
Why are you the underdog in this race, Balter asks. "We have a maniac as president," Harrell says, and "we should rightly want change."
proftrees.bsky.social
I watched the debate today and this moment was awkward. The student wasn't the best at enunciating, but Harrell wasn't listening that well. "Brother" felt like an example of him being weird and out of touch.
Meme: "How do you do, fellow kids?"
Reposted by Aidan Trees
proftrees.bsky.social
It's accepted in the street art/muralist community that graffiti happens and street art is inherently temporary. So (for non hate crimes) I think that we still need to have a level of discretion applied i.e. a 5+ year old mural that gets some tags at street level isn't a big deal.
proftrees.bsky.social
at the same time the damage estimates for graffiti already seem to be inflated to create propaganda and justify harsher punishments. I think in my ideal world, how we treat graffiti now would be the level applied to mural vandals, and most graffiti on gray walls is then decriminalized.
proftrees.bsky.social
I stopped myself from making the argument that this is different from some other graffiti cases because it's not just some paint on a gray wall, this is damaging a mural which means it's potentially $1000's in damage. I do think a distinction needs to be considered in our laws, but ...
Reposted by Aidan Trees
robertcruickshank.com
Good thread showing how Harrell's experience is one of the biggest arguments *against* his reelection. He's done a genuinely bad job of running the city, and rewarding that with four more years is an insane thing to do.
rianwatt.bsky.social
If Bruce Harrell's case for re-election is his management experience, what should we make of two separate instances in the last week of city decisions made under his watch being immediately reversed after huge community blowback?
proftrees.bsky.social
"I try to argue with data"....proceeds to quote incorrect data
proftrees.bsky.social
I'm not going to give money to them, if I want to read an article then I get it for free the next day through the library website.
Reposted by Aidan Trees
tylsim.bsky.social
Bruce Harrell has gotten very good at talking about progressive things that happened in the city despite his administration and touting them as if he had anything to do with them

when really his prerogative is treating graffiti as the highest priority municipal issue
proftrees.bsky.social
So much of Seattle politics revolves around who we allow to be street vendors and who can do street art...

At what point do we stop teaching kids to have lemonade stands and making sidewalk chalk art?
Reposted by Aidan Trees
ericacbarnett.bsky.social
I like murals too but I was struck recently by some genuinely beautiful (and illegal) art along I-5, which the city would classify a "tags" for which the creator should be fined $1,000 apiece
Reposted by Aidan Trees
ericacbarnett.bsky.social
I wouldn't mind a graffiti wall like the Mauerpark, however (but Berlin is absolutely covered in graffiti, the Seattle City Council would hate it)
Reposted by Aidan Trees
ericacbarnett.bsky.social
It's funny to hear the council talk about how excited they are to have "bodegas," given that they also voted to require all such stores to close their doors by 10pm.
proftrees.bsky.social
One of my issues with Seattle parks is that they seem to ignore the fact that it's rainy, wet, and dark for a majority of the year. I'd love to play futsal/street soccer year round, I play Friday nights at Judkins park, but there is no cover and no lights, so if it's wet or dark...you can't play.
proftrees.bsky.social
Let's talk about the city/district balance that Saka brings to the job...he's the chair of the city wide transportation committee but his top priority as a CM was a trans project to remove a safety barrier (against the rec of SDOT) that impacted him personally.
typewriteralley.bsky.social
During the two hour session on Friday where the Seattle council questioned Interim SDOT Director Adiam Emery, this was to me the most notable moment, where Rob Saka praises Emery's "very unique, savvy understanding" of Seattle's "district-based representation model."
Reposted by Aidan Trees
sharethecities.bsky.social
The city ruled chalk is graffiti and at the Graham Street event the city are encouraging sidewalk chalk art. Which is it?