Adam Pulver
@pulvinator.bsky.social
470 followers 87 following 360 posts
Public interest attorney- admin law, workers rights, consumer rights, civil rights- personal account/views my own - he/him
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
pulvinator.bsky.social
Maybe allowing law professors to engage with each other on social media was a bad thing
pulvinator.bsky.social
But pundits on social media said it was amazing!
pulvinator.bsky.social
I don't think her aggressive style in argument is remotely comparable to getting up and ranting about the legitimacy of the Court and morality of other opinions.
pulvinator.bsky.social
No no, the Supreme Court justices are just one more sick burn from a law professor podcast or slate think piece from changing their minds
pulvinator.bsky.social
I have attended a Lisa Blatt argument, thanks.
pulvinator.bsky.social
At best, the client is ok with you converting an oral argument into an opportunity for you to make the case about you and your smug self satisfaction
pulvinator.bsky.social
How would this benefit the client at all?
pulvinator.bsky.social
Which isn't just a personal loss, but a loss for the causes you believe in in which you can actually effect change as a litigator
pulvinator.bsky.social
I've had a lot of people ask me if I'd just rant at Justices of the Supreme Court in oral argument. But my duty is to a client, and shouting at Supreme Court justices wouldn't help the client, me, or anything else even if it would make me famous on social media
johnpfaff.bsky.social
There has got to a be several cases this term w a pre-determined conservative win.

In one, a lawyer should pull a Sen Whitehouse, who ignored a nominee at a hearing to just lecture abt FedSoc influence.

The lawyer should just quote Kav, and then read one ex after another of that being wrong.
joedudekjd.bsky.social
18 days later, Justice Kavanaugh would write: “If the person is a U. S.
citizen or otherwise lawfully in the United States, that individual will be free to go after the brief encounter.”
pulvinator.bsky.social
Law professor who lacks strong predictive abilities as to political outcomes mocks political commentator for same thing, tonight at 10.
pulvinator.bsky.social
In a concurrence in a Title VII case today, one judge looks to ChatGPT in assessing whether a term is racially hostile. What could go wrong? www.opn.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf...
www.opn.ca6.uscourts.gov
Reposted by Adam Pulver
keptsimple.bsky.social
if you're a law professor it should be in your labor contract that you're not allowed to become a public intellectual
pulvinator.bsky.social
Second, in one of the rare challenges to a Biden-era pro-worker rule that the Administration is not collusively settling- an amicus brief explaining why a rule that protects migrant workers from unscrupulous employers is not vague or retroactive www.citizen.org/litigation/f...
Federation of Employers and Workers of America v. Noem - Public Citizen
The H-2A and H-2B visa programs allow employers to petition the Department of Homeland Security for visas on behalf of…
www.citizen.org
pulvinator.bsky.social
What sexy topics you may ask? First, removal and immunity under the Federally Supported Health Care Assistance Act and Federal Officer Removal Statute. Where's the podcast on *that*? www.citizen.org/litigation/b...
Bradford v. Asian Health Services - Public Citizen
After a data breach exposed some of his protected personal information, Ira Bradford brought a class action against Asian Health…
www.citizen.org
pulvinator.bsky.social
Have filed two briefs already today, so making sure 5785 goes out with a bang!
pulvinator.bsky.social
But Raffi, I thought winning at the Supreme Court was the only thing that matters in law
pulvinator.bsky.social
Bold: a party ordered to pay attorney's fees argued that years spent as a judicial law clerk do not count as legal work experience. Neither the magistrate or the district judge agreed:
ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show...
ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov
pulvinator.bsky.social
(Amicus briefs can be important! I write amicus briefs! Less than 1% of amicus briefs are media-worthy.)
pulvinator.bsky.social
Every email I receive from lawyers crowing about the filing of an amicus brief as a sign of a massive achievement and act of heroism takes a year off my life.
pulvinator.bsky.social
The two American political institutions most dedicated to making me cry are the Supreme Court and the telemarketing firm that random Democratic congressional candidates use to send me epic text tomes.
pulvinator.bsky.social
Yes I read that article in the Atlantic no I wont be commenting because I've been told not to say negative things on the internet