Ryan Jabs
@ryanjabs.bsky.social
230 followers 500 following 89 posts
Dad who's fascinated by urban planning. Runner of a small #YYJ home development company. Trying to build the right things. www.lapishomes.com Art by Elizabeth Upton (https://www.instagram.com/living.whimsically.rocks?utm_source=ig_web_button_share_sheet&)
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
ryanjabs.bsky.social
1. Is pretty intriguing if they mandate a certain minimum buildable area. That could address setbacks, open space, lot coverage, etc.
ryanjabs.bsky.social
The extra 5 X 20ish feet added about $200K to my total build cost, but that's offset by the little bit of extra revenue the 2-beds generate. It also opened my building up to a couple of families with a child. No new babies yet, but there's certainly an option. Definitely worth it.
ryanjabs.bsky.social
I had 2 window walls in this little 3-storey PBR, with 5 extra ft of length on one side. That allowed me to redesign 4 1-beds into 4 2-beds. I love the large one-beds in this building, but the 2-beds are more flexible. Unfortunately, my footprint was closely scrutinized so I couldn't do both sides.
ryanjabs.bsky.social
It’s this craziness that led to CMHC’s “standardized” sixplex design where they split the staircase inside and outside the building so the doors were only 1.5m above grade. It illustrates how dumb the rule is as this is a less safe design.

www.housingcatalogue.cmhc-schl.gc.ca/designs/bc/c...
Courtyard Sixplex
www.housingcatalogue.cmhc-schl.gc.ca
ryanjabs.bsky.social
It’s almost impossible to fit secondary exits into stacked townhouses without doing silly inefficient things so we typically sink them.
ryanjabs.bsky.social
I can’t say for certain as I can’t see the floor plans, but I don’t think you’re going to eliminate this issue even if Van allows another meter or 2 height. The ridiculous bc building code requires a secondary egress for all units built under part 9 if the home’s door is more than 1.5m above grade.
ryanjabs.bsky.social
100%. This is one of the poison pills in Victoria’s OCP and related policies. Their open space, storm and tree location requirements + setbacks make parking impossible to build unless it’s $$$ and climate killing underground, but they’re also charging significant fees if a builder doesn’t build it.
ryanjabs.bsky.social
Code writers unfortunately don’t understand that relatively minor “low cost” changes introduced every few years add significant costs as industry and inspectors have to constantly catch up to the new code and suppliers and labourers add money to compensate for the added risk of missing something.
ryanjabs.bsky.social
They’re getting a lot less bang for the buck so homelessness and related deaths and public costs (to the Canadian health care system) rise because we can’t build enough even with the significant public (and private) investments.
ryanjabs.bsky.social
In B.C., it’s even more insane as senior governments are spending more and more on massively needed public housing while constantly introducing new code and technical requirements, mostly on multifamily, with very limited incremental benefits for the added costs.
Reposted by Ryan Jabs
stephenjacobsmith.com
I can't stop thinking about this. We're pursuing zero fire risk in multifam, while tolerating much more in single-fam. People respond by building and living in single-fam, where they're exposed to not only one of the highest fire death risks in the developed world, but also TONS more car crash risk
ebwhamilton.bsky.social
Love this new report on buildings' relative fire safety from @alexhrwtz.bsky.social and Pew colleagues.

www.pew.org/en/research-...
ryanjabs.bsky.social
Absolutely. Province said they were working on a part 9 single staircase option (probably no elevators), which is a no brainer with sprinklers, but it’s been over a year and nothing yet, so we’ll see. I could see that possibly working in Victoria’s zone. The lanes in Van unlock a lot more potential.
ryanjabs.bsky.social
I’ve heard from a smaller builder he might try variances for six storeys version to make them pencil. I don’t think staff will support that as the OCP says lot assemblies and larger housing blocks if five or six storey. They even seem to have leeway to reject 4 storeys to avoid “orphaning.”
ryanjabs.bsky.social
I’m curious to see if anyone will try this. The taxes, open space, new DCCs, high TDMs, storm water and tree bylaws will make it really challenging to pencil a 4 storey building. We may see it in higher cost neighbourhoods as higher end homes w/ underground parking to limit risk/offset the tdm tax.
ryanjabs.bsky.social
I still don’t quite understood why, but this is the type of building still very much frowned upon in @victoria.ca’s newly adopted official community plan.

12 family sized homes in one smaller building would allow community to form, but the city unfortunately does not want it.
lanefab.com
The New Vancouver Special - 50' lot edition.

Accessible single stair flats on a 50x122 lot.
12 family size homes (or) 24 small units.
Reposted by Ryan Jabs
jensvb.bsky.social
The fact that BC planners feel the need to invent a new word to indicate that a zoning change is government-initiated is very telling.
lausterna.bsky.social
Delta puts together a proposal for townhouse-only zoning... and gets in on the game of trying to explain BC municipalities' newest planning concept of "pre-zoning"

(perhaps inadvertently explaining a key portion of how we got into housing shortage in the first place) letstalk.delta.ca/pre-zoning
Delta explanation of Pre-Zoning text:

What is Pre-Zoning?

Pre-zoning is a process where a municipality proactively changes the zoning for certain areas to align with land use designations, to encourage certain types of development such as housing. This would speed up the process for getting new housing built faster. Future projects in a pre-zoned area could apply for permits directly without needing a lengthier rezoning process. Pre-zoning is considered in locations that are consistent with the Official Community Plan (OCP)
ryanjabs.bsky.social
A small window into why new housing is so expensive. Everything is like this… and unfortunately getting worse.
Reposted by Ryan Jabs
lanefab.com
Ok, I've been pondering some of the ways that BC's new housing minister @christineboyle.bsky.social might build on the expansive work championed by @ravikahlon.bsky.social and her previous work as a @cityofvancouver.bsky.social councillor.

So - here's a first draft: 🧵
Reposted by Ryan Jabs
plannersean.bsky.social
ANALYSIS: Standard home plans aren’t ‘performative’ — they’re illuminating

Government-approved home designs teach bureaucrats, not builders

The plans absolutely confirm what the private sector has been saying for years: the building code and zoning are problems

www.tvo.org/article/anal...
TVO Today | Current Affairs Journalism, Documentaries and Podcasts
www.tvo.org
Reposted by Ryan Jabs
seanyyz.bsky.social
The new Ste-Catharine streetscape is so good. Very wide (and busy!) sidewalks. Lots of places to sit. Work is progressing on extending this west.
Planters, and a high quality wide sidewalk Lots of benches like this One driving lane with space on the sides for deliveries and car drop offs/pick ups.