Text SIGN PWBGRC to 50409 — I am writing to urge you, as a state legislator, to speak out publicly and take concrete action against the Trump Department of Justice’s expanding lawsuits seeking unredacted voter registration data from the states. The DOJ has now sued at least eighteen states—including Massachusetts and Nevada—for refusing to turn over voter rolls containing highly sensitive personal information. These demands go far beyond what is publicly available and include home addresses, dates of birth, driver’s license numbers, and partial Social Security numbers. This effort represents an unprecedented federal intrusion into state-run elections and a serious threat to voter privacy. The Constitution assigns primary responsibility for administering elections to the states. That authority carries with it a duty to protect voters from unnecessary exposure of their personal data. By attempting to centralize state voter information through litigation, the DOJ is asserting a level of federal control over elections that states of both parties have rightly rejected. Independent reporting confirms that this is not an isolated action. The DOJ has pursued voter data from dozens of states and local jurisdictions, escalating to lawsuits when states refuse. This pattern suggests a coordinated attempt to compile a nationwide store of sensitive voter information—something without modern precedent. The privacy risks are severe. Collecting driver’s license numbers and Social Security digits at scale dramatically increases the risk of data breaches, identity theft, harassment, and politically motivated targeting. Once this information leaves state control, voters lose meaningful protection over how their data is used or misused. No federal assurance can undo the harm of exposure. Beyond privacy, this effort risks undermining free and fair elections themselves. Access to unredacted voter data would enable mass voter challenges, fuel false claims of fraud, and facilitate new barriers to voting, including proof-of-citizenship schemes that disproportionately burden working-class voters, students, and communities of color. State officials across the country—Democrats and Republicans alike—have stated plainly that the DOJ lacks legal authority to demand this information. Their resistance reflects a shared understanding that protecting elections means protecting voters, not surrendering their data under threat of litigation. State legislators must not remain silent. I urge you to: • Publicly oppose these DOJ lawsuits • Affirm your state’s constitutional authority over elections • Support legislation strengthening voter data privacy protections • Stand behind state election officials defending voters in court This is a defining moment for federalism, privacy, and democratic self-government. Please be outspoken and decisive in defending the voters you serve.

Read more here.

Text SIGN PELAKZ to 50409 — With enhanced ACA premium tax credits set to expire at the end of this year, millions of Americans are facing catastrophic premium spikes—thousands of dollars per month for many families. The Senate is now preparing to vote on extending these credits, a vote forced as part of the agreement to reopen the government. This extension is essential, and I urge you to support a clean renewal of the ACA premium tax credits without delay. Unfortunately, Senate Republicans have now introduced the Crapo-Cassidy bill as their counterproposal. While marketed as a plan to address premium spikes, the bill is filled with provisions that would dramatically restrict access to both abortion and gender-affirming care, and would destabilize health coverage nationwide. These provisions must not become bargaining chips in any negotiation. The Crapo-Cassidy plan: • Replaces ACA premium subsidies with small HSA deposits that do nothing to offset real premium increases. • Bans HSAs from covering gender-affirming care for people of any age. • Strips gender-affirming care from the ACA’s Essential Health Benefits, allowing insurers to drop coverage entirely. • Bans Medicaid from covering gender-affirming care, cutting off the only affordable option for many low-income trans Americans. • Includes new abortion-related restrictions, embedding an ideological agenda inside what is supposed to be a health-care affordability bill. These provisions have no place in must-pass health legislation. They are not about solving premium spikes—they are part of a long pattern of attempts to weaponize health policy against transgender people and those seeking reproductive care. Similar riders appeared in earlier GOP proposals, in shutdown negotiations, in defense bills, and even in the so-called “big beautiful bill.” Each time, these attacks have been rejected. They must be rejected again. We should not allow Republicans to hold affordable health care hostage in exchange for stripping medically necessary care from entire groups of Americans. Gender-affirming care is life-saving and recognized as medically necessary by every major U.S. medical association. Abortion care is essential health care. No extension of ACA subsidies should be conditioned on denying people the care they need. Congress must act now to prevent a nationwide premium crisis and protect millions of families from financial devastation. A clean extension of the enhanced ACA tax credits is the only responsible path forward. I urge you to: 1. Support a clean, immediate renewal of ACA premium tax credits. 2. Oppose the Crapo-Cassidy bill and any health-care proposal that includes restrictions on abortion or gender-affirming care. 3. Reject all attempts to use transgender health care or reproductive rights as bargaining chips in essential health-care negotiations. Affordable health care should not be a battlefield for ideological attacks. Protect the ACA. Protect families. Protect medically necessary care for every American.

Text SIGN PLBVXB to 50409 — I'm writing to demand that you oppose any legislative provision that blocks state-level regulation of AI. Congress should be working to protect our safety and privacy from the unknown risks of AI, not prioritizing the self-serving needs of big tech corporations and billionaires.