David Shiffman, Ph.D. 🦈
@whysharksmatter.bsky.social
94K followers 1.5K following 110K posts
I am a marine conservation biologist studying sharks and a science writer. Posts are about science and the environment, science communication, and more! He/him
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by David Shiffman, Ph.D. 🦈
jeremymberg.bsky.social
This is a powerful account from a PhD student whose fellowship was terminated by NIH because it was part of a "diversity" program without any other considerations or understanding of what the program or the students were actually doing.

undark.org/2025/10/09/o...

1/2
NIH Student Grant Cancellation Will Weaken Scientific Innovation
The termination of federal F31 diversity fellowships puts many graduate students in a bind — and U.S. science at risk.
undark.org
Reposted by David Shiffman, Ph.D. 🦈
mmasnick.bsky.social
Was worried that this was going to be *yet another* of the "people should all go back to Twitter" nonsense pieces, but @ianbetteridge.com's law of headlines rarely fails. The answer here is a clear "no" with good reasons:
Well – no. Bluesky may or may not be, as one centre-right friend who felt unwelcome put it, “self-righteous island”. But the idea that that is the reason why we went is nonsense. That I’ve largely stopped posting on a site that’s done more to shape my career and social circle than the rest of the internet combined is less about avoiding rival opinions (I love arguing with people who are wrong) than with the fact the site simply became unusable. It stopped generating the things (good jokes, interesting debate, clicks) I wanted; it became extremely good at generating the things (racists, pornbots, racist pornbots) I did not. Those who stayed behind have lost something, too: the ability to not have their worldview shaped by some of the maddest people on the internet. One of the Tories’ big conference announcements was the promise of an Ice-style border force that would deport [citation needed] 150,000 people a year. That mass deportations of most existing migrants is not actually popular in the UK – that such a policy places yet more distance between the Tories and the mainstream centre which deserted them last year – seems not to have occurred.

It’s hard not to connect this to the fact that much of the political class remains on a platform now dominated by the political extremes. They might do well to remember: Twitter is not the real world.
Reposted by David Shiffman, Ph.D. 🦈
katieocean.bsky.social
Hey @oceanknigge.bsky.social look at our friend! :)
oceanaeurope.bsky.social
We're happy to announce that @verampcoelho.bsky.social has been appointed as Oceana in Europe's Vice President & Executive Director!👏

She has been key in securing 20+ policy wins for our ocean and will now lead our campaigns to protect & restore European seas.

➡️ europe.oceana.org/press-releas...
Reposted by David Shiffman, Ph.D. 🦈
denis-gilbert.ca
Statistics on how scientists feel about their presence on Bluesky versus Twitter. My personal experience (before closing my Twitter account in August 2023) was that engagement for my tweets had dropped to close to zero. No longer worth the effort...

#Bluesky #Twitter #X #socialmedia
Reposted by David Shiffman, Ph.D. 🦈
joshchafetz.bsky.social
I've become much freer with blocking over the past year or so. Basically, in addition to blocking for insults, I now also block for being tedious.
kevinmkruse.bsky.social
Someone in my mentions is upset because these people haven’t suffered the worst at ICE’s hands and therefore they shouldn’t be praised for being out on the streets?

Yeah, no. To push back on these people we need everyone — especially those with relative privilege — to get up and get involved.
kevinmkruse.bsky.social
Portland, you magnificent weirdos
Reposted by David Shiffman, Ph.D. 🦈
leahshaffer.bsky.social
#ScienceSky, tell your colleagues to leave X, delete those x buttons on your lab page and replace with a butterfly. I declare #Bluesky the official social network for science and by scientists (you and your network of colleagues operate as your own algorithm determining what you see here). 🩺 🧪
whysharksmatter.bsky.social
Friends,

If I do not know you, and we have never communicated before about any topic, instead of reaching out to tell me that you found an insignificant typo in something I wrote months ago, you could instead just...say nothing.
whysharksmatter.bsky.social
Someone asked me to consider sharing stories and legends from indigenous communities about sharks.

My professional development training for working in this space stressed the idea of "nothing about us without us," i.e., I should not be the one to tell their stories.
Reposted by David Shiffman, Ph.D. 🦈
cjmoose.bsky.social
I don’t know what the parameters are for the Discovery feed, but I somehow ended up on it ONE TIME with a rather innocuous post and honestly I don’t know how y’all deal with that insanity on a regular basis.
Reposted by David Shiffman, Ph.D. 🦈
franzanth.bsky.social
definitely noticing this past 100 shares
whysharksmatter.bsky.social
Ok but what we said was when *our* posts show up on Discover, it means that people who love to scream about nonsense reply to it.
whysharksmatter.bsky.social
Yup, that seems to be it.

Or getting shared by someone with a huge audience that doesn't overlap with my audience. I seem to be followed by some of the #Resistance people with tens of thousands of followers, and they share my stuff seeminly at random.
Reposted by David Shiffman, Ph.D. 🦈
drandrewthaler.bsky.social
The lack of a central algorithm prevents most of the nonsense, since the vast majority of your skeets are only seen by your audience.

But regardless of the number of reposts, it's hitting the Discovery feed that causes containment breach.
Reposted by David Shiffman, Ph.D. 🦈
lizardky.bsky.social
Well, that's the problem with trolls. If you chop them to bits, each bits grows back into a new troll. Stock up on flaming oil, vials of acid, and scrolls of fireball.
Reposted by David Shiffman, Ph.D. 🦈
timokoola.bsky.social
As a "regular person", I hit this in Twitter already somewhere around 100 RTs. I wish social media had this option that I could block too many shares beyond my immediate circle of people. Maybe something like "only let people I follow repost this" and it would be on by default
Reposted by David Shiffman, Ph.D. 🦈
word-geek.bsky.social
Probably when your post hits Discover. But also, users here just change the settings so people can't respond or quote post, which has to make it slightly less frustrating
whysharksmatter.bsky.social
24-48 hours is enough to qualify I think.

And I think 50-100 is a reasonable estimate as well