Science Surf
@wjst.de
370 followers 100 following 460 posts
Matthias Wjst, md, prof, Munich, just retired and more time to think about #molecular #epidemiology #datascience #imaging #ethics #integrity
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Science Surf
retractionwatch.com
Dr. Oransky warned of consequences for self-governance failure: "If you don't self-police, if you don't correct the record, if you don't sanction people who commit fraud, [...] someone else will come in and do that. And it very well could be a government that you don't like."
Is Science Retracting Enough Papers?
As paper mills and fraud proliferate, experts warn the retraction rate should reach 2% of published literature—ten times current levels.
conexiant.com
Reposted by Science Surf
sherylnyt.bsky.social
BREAKING: Friday night massacre underway at CDC. Doznes of "disease detectives," high-level scientists, entire Washington staff and editors of the MMWR (Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report) have all been RIFed and received the following notice:
Reposted by Science Surf
karlrolson.com
Ah, so Anthropic joins the list of OpenAI & Apple admitting/finally doing the research to discover that their are in-built, "unstoppable by code-fixes"-alone, input-driven flaws with LLMs/DNNs generally, due to the mathematical constraints that govern them: arxiv.org/abs/2510.07192
Reposted by Science Surf
drsforamerica.bsky.social
In an extraordinary joint statement, 6 former U.S. Surgeons General warn:
RFK Jr. is "endangering the health of the nation.”

We’ve previously called for RFK Jr.’s resignation, this moment confirms why. Patient health must come before politics.
www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/202...
Opinion | Six surgeons general: It’s our duty to warn the nation about RFK Jr.
We took an oath to declare dangers when we found them. We’re doing that again today.
www.washingtonpost.com
Reposted by Science Surf
tdverstynen.bsky.social
The myth of meritocracy inspires the implicit assumption that someone’s degree of success reflects their level of competence and skill.

I think that this is one of the most toxic myths of our time.
Reposted by Science Surf
gregfolkers.bsky.social
Lancet: Offline: Those one should not forgive (Makary and Bhattacharya)

by Richard Horton

bit.ly/3IPC0PD
Reposted by Science Surf
nickkristof.bsky.social
President Trump's aid cuts are disproportionately hitting women and girls: forcing them to drop out of school or leading them to die in childbirth or perish from cervical cancer, or to marry as young teens. That's what I found in the field: www.nytimes.com/2025/09/27/o...
Opinion | The Tax on Being a Girl
www.nytimes.com
Reposted by Science Surf
wjst.de
thank you - great ressource for a review
reeserichardson.bsky.social
We are now up to 14 journals! New journals:

BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Genomics
BMC Public Health (30,000+ articles!)

Archives are now up to >600K peer review documents for >85K articles. All are available to download on Zenodo!
reeserichardson.blog/datasets
wjst.de
„it tended to sacrifice accuracy for simplicity“
science.org
Can #ChatGPT help science writers?

In a new Editor's Blog post, Abigail Eisenstadt reports the results of a year-long analysis that explored whether a #LLM had the potential to help writers on our press team clearly and accurately convey information about upcoming research. https://scim.ag/46gVrd6
Can ChatGPT help science writers?
www.science.org
Reposted by Science Surf
annaalexandrova.bsky.social
Ghostwriters frame material and framing matters. Even in science. A great write up on Nick Hopwood’s research into the history of Edwards and Steptoe’s book A Matter of Life. #histmed #histsci
wjst.de
Something that I always suspected - a scientific result was always judged by institution and not by merits.
carlbergstrom.com
Yet again, machine learning — even gussied up via the transformer architecture — encodes and reinforces societal biases.

This study reveals that LLM-based peer review relies heavily on author institution in its decisions.

arxiv.org/abs/2509.15122
Prestige over merit: An adapted audit of LLM bias in peer review
Large language models (LLMs) are playing an increasingly integral, though largely informal, role in scholarly peer review. Yet it remains unclear whether LLMs reproduce the biases observed in human de...
arxiv.org
wjst.de
IMHO a lot of aggregated pseudo information including „sentiments“ of individuals although science is a collaborative enterprise. And well, very basic errors.
Reposted by Science Surf
Reposted by Science Surf
nickkristof.bsky.social
I've been reporting in East Africa on the impact of President Trump's USAID cuts, and I find that not only are children dying in large numbers but the pace is accelerating as stockpiles run out and people grow weaker. www.nytimes.com/2025/09/20/o...
Opinion | Trump’s Most Lethal Policy
www.nytimes.com