Shannon Vallor
banner
shannonvallor.bsky.social
Shannon Vallor
@shannonvallor.bsky.social

Philosopher/AI Ethicist at Univ of Edinburgh, co-Director @technomoralfutures.bsky.social and BRAID @braiduk.bsky.social, author of Technology and the Virtues (2016) and The AI Mirror (2024). Views my own. Trying not to lose it. .. more

Shannon Vallor is an American philosopher of technology. She is the Baillie Gifford Chair in the Ethics of Data and Artificial Intelligence at the Edinburgh Futures Institute. She previously taught at Santa Clara University in Santa Clara, California where she was the Regis and Dianne McKenna Professor of Philosophy and William J. Rewak, S.J. Professor at SCU. .. more

Neuroscience 30%
Computer science 22%

Oh yeah the billboards were the first sign of the sickness…like leaves turning yellow one by one

Reposted by Shannon Vallor

Yes well common sense is overrated, exuberant puppy/kitten love wins

The thing is, in 1999 I was laser-focused on how much further we still had to go to make the modern world something to be proud of. I had no idea we were about to do a giant pratfall and slide halfway down the mountain.
Very tired of having to explain to people old enough to know better that it has NOT, in fact, always been true that we allow technology to get ever more dangerous and damaging as it ‘advances’. Please stop memory-holing the entire 20th century

Right???

I’ll delete it’s just a bit confusing

AND THEN WE MADE IT VERY ILLEGAL TO PUT RADIUM IN PEOPLE’S STUFF

the correct lesson is NOT ‘same old same old, we have always just tolerated unsafe products’

sigh

planes, trains, automobiles, hair dryers, medical devices, power tools, air conditioners, bicycles, lamps, boats, elevators/lifts, bridges ok I am going to stop typing now but not because I am out of examples!

Yes. But I now hear it every week from people extremely influential and respected at the tech/policy intersection.

I say ‘I want to see/demand safer and more socially beneficial technology’

They say ‘that’s unrealistic we are not going to go backward in tech/AI’

and I say ‘do you hear yourself’

Very tired of having to explain to people old enough to know better that it has NOT, in fact, always been true that we allow technology to get ever more dangerous and damaging as it ‘advances’. Please stop memory-holing the entire 20th century

Reposted by Shannon Vallor

Just a reminder that the people who run AI companies talk like this when amongst themselves and when you ask me if I'm anti-AI, well, I'm anti whatever the fuck this is

Thanks Clay! That’s lovely to hear. You’re the second person today to tell me they have shared the book with others and you can imagine how much that helps with the motivation to write the next one!

Not mad about having to buy this book twice!
Exciting book post today for beautifying my shelves.

The special edition sprayed edge version of How To Lose the Time War by @amalelmohtar.com & @maxgladstone.bsky.social ..

It's so pretty

The budget levy on international fees seems to confirm that the UK government is, for reasons that defy economic logic, determined to break the backs of its own world-class universities just as the US government does the same. Now why would a government want to destroy the modern university I wonder

Reposted by Shannon Vallor

It was wonderful to hear from EFI Visiting Fellow, Dr Ramsha Naeem, yesterday!

During her talk, Dr Naeem discussed the differences between what AI ethics is & what management theorists think AI can be, & her work towards proposing an integrated model to bridge that gap.

@shannonvallor.bsky.social

Reposted by Shannon Vallor

Exciting book post today for beautifying my shelves.

The special edition sprayed edge version of How To Lose the Time War by @amalelmohtar.com & @maxgladstone.bsky.social ..

It's so pretty
Additionally, OpenAI argues its not liable because Raine, by using ChatGPT for self-harm, broke its terms of service

Amazing news Ruha - such a fantastic team coming together!

Posted about liking a thing. Rookie mistake

Soylent green was a documentary only they got the substrate wrong

Sure, I’m not asking for anyone’s permission though! I know I’m allowed to like whatever I like. I am just curious about the specificity of its appeal

For a yr, I've been working on a series for The New Atlantis about the vast systems that underlie our lives. Our ancestors built them up over decades to fend off hunger, thirst, darkness and disease. But too few of us know about them—and they're all at risk. The conclusion is now available online:
Why We Are Better Off Than a Century Ago
Our ancestors built grand public systems to conquer hunger, thirst, darkness, and squalor. That progress can be lost if we forget it.
www.thenewatlantis.com
Is this cheese grater conscious? Many users feel they're talking to a real person. Scientists say it's time to consider whether they're onto something.

maybe but I’m not sure I want to sit next to a drunk octopus

In any era but this one, a reasonable person would rightly assume that the FT and HSBC had concluded that setting fire to all the money was bad

I know. I can’t even. My summary in the replies:
Yet the article’s takeaway reads more like:

who cares if it loses money

who needs money

what even is money

we will all fill our bellies with AI

Yet the article’s takeaway reads more like:

who cares if it loses money

who needs money

what even is money

we will all fill our bellies with AI

Because this is Bluesky someone will probably come here to yell at me for plagiarizing dril without a proper citation, please just laugh

Reposted by Adrian Daub

somebody who is good at the economy please help them budget this, their bullshit factory is dying