James Grimmelmann
@jtlg.bsky.social
5.3K followers 33 following 1.1K posts

I’m a professor at Cornell Tech and Cornell Law School. One of "a number of very informative people." -WSJ

Computer science 34%
Political science 21%
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs

jtlg.bsky.social
That’s good, but how about “breadsticks and roses”?

jtlg.bsky.social
There was a time when these “assurances” were just … the law. But by blowing up law as a constraint, the Trump administration has made itself into a weaker negotiator, because it can’t make credible promises.

Reposted by James Grimmelmann

Reposted by James Grimmelmann

rtushnet.bsky.social
Feels like more execs should have read Bruce Bueno de Mesquita & Alastair Smith's The Dictator's Handbook--there is currently competition to be a preferred crony, which means both instability and less revenue extraction for businesses trying to cozy up
annmlipton.bsky.social
"The invitation to the 'Future of Pharmaceuticals' summit prompted consternation among some drug-company representatives, who worried that the gathering signaled that the White House wants them to work with the little-known BlinkRx because of its ties to the president’s family"
Trump Wants to Overhaul Drug Sales. A Company Tied to His Son Stands to Benefit.
The family members of President Trump and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick are poised to benefit from efforts to remake the pharmaceutical industry.
www.wsj.com
annmlipton.bsky.social
"The invitation to the 'Future of Pharmaceuticals' summit prompted consternation among some drug-company representatives, who worried that the gathering signaled that the White House wants them to work with the little-known BlinkRx because of its ties to the president’s family"
Trump Wants to Overhaul Drug Sales. A Company Tied to His Son Stands to Benefit.
The family members of President Trump and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick are poised to benefit from efforts to remake the pharmaceutical industry.
www.wsj.com

Reposted by Rebecca Tushnet

jtlg.bsky.social
<general contractor slapping a rotting post> Well, there’s your problem right there. Whoever built this thing used Marbury v. Madison as a foundation. You’re lucky it lasted as long as it did.

jtlg.bsky.social
Day Two of the new Platformer format and I am really not digging it. The thing I wasn’t getting anywhere else (the curated link roundup) is gone, replaced with a thing I can get tons of other places (short takes on already widely-reposted stories).
caseynewton.bsky.social
Wrote about fresh signs of an AI bubble (and why the industry says the worries are mostly overblown) www.platformer.news/ai-bubble-20...
We have entered the "weird financial tricks" phase of the bubble. A reliable indicator of bubbles is that companies concoct bizarre financial instruments and accounting measures to paper over their problems. In Fortune, Allie Garfinkel reports that venture capitalists are irked at some of the creative accounting going on in their portfolios. Some startups are reporting one-time sales as "recurring revenue." Others technically show "recurring revenue" for what are essentially trials.

And that's on the tame side. For crazy, you can look to Robinhood's suggestion that it might offer "tokenized" equity in OpenAI. By "tokenized," Business Insider reports, Robinhood means "blockchain-enabled representations of securities like stocks." In reality, they have no connection to OpenAI equity whatsoever. But that doesn't mean that consumers shouldn't be able to gamble on the mirage!

Reposted by James Grimmelmann

caseynewton.bsky.social
Wrote about fresh signs of an AI bubble (and why the industry says the worries are mostly overblown) www.platformer.news/ai-bubble-20...
We have entered the "weird financial tricks" phase of the bubble. A reliable indicator of bubbles is that companies concoct bizarre financial instruments and accounting measures to paper over their problems. In Fortune, Allie Garfinkel reports that venture capitalists are irked at some of the creative accounting going on in their portfolios. Some startups are reporting one-time sales as "recurring revenue." Others technically show "recurring revenue" for what are essentially trials.

And that's on the tame side. For crazy, you can look to Robinhood's suggestion that it might offer "tokenized" equity in OpenAI. By "tokenized," Business Insider reports, Robinhood means "blockchain-enabled representations of securities like stocks." In reality, they have no connection to OpenAI equity whatsoever. But that doesn't mean that consumers shouldn't be able to gamble on the mirage!

jtlg.bsky.social
If, hypothetically speaking, one thought that the AI boom were a bubble, what asset classes would be most insulated from it?

Reposted by James Grimmelmann

Reposted by James Grimmelmann

Reposted by James Grimmelmann

fedsocpitchbot.bsky.social
“Money shall be drawn from the Treasury” as a Grant of Executive Authority

jtlg.bsky.social
It’s 1992 in Trump’s brain, and if there aren’t riots for him to send the National Guard against, he will manifest them.

Reposted by James Grimmelmann

peark.es
Well that's not how appropriations work at all

*WHITE HOUSE TO TRANSFER TARIFF REVENUE TO FUND WIC: LEAVITT

jtlg.bsky.social
No, the adjuncts are the potted plant in the background. If they're lucky, someone remembers they need water.

Reposted by James Grimmelmann

jtlg.bsky.social
Heck, they also rely on their own employees to submit original work. That too is in danger.

Reposted by Mark A. Lemley

jtlg.bsky.social
“Maybe another sector AI is disrupting is the ability to "rely" on overcaffeinated and drugged up twenty-somethings to kill themselves on consulting assignments to squeeze a few more dollars out of the bottom line.”

jtlg.bsky.social
Is this a genuine difference between the "post-totalitarian system" of 1978 Czechoslovakia and the personalist system Trump wants to impose on the United States in 2025? And if so, how do his demands function? Or is this just a further spelling-out of ideas that are already present in Havel?

5/5

jtlg.bsky.social
Whereas I get the sense that if Brad Karp (Paul Weiss) or Claire Shipman (Columbia) said, "I am afraid and therefore unquestioningly obedient," it would be rejected as an insufficient demonstration of fealty. That kind of truth-telling allows them to retain _too much_ dignity.

4/5

jtlg.bsky.social
Havel says that if the greengrocer hung a sign saying "I am afraid and therefore unquestioningly obedient," it wouldn't work. That would be too degrading and he couldn't "conceal from himself the low foundations of his obedience."

3/5

jtlg.bsky.social
I've seen various people cite Havel over the last eight years for the way in which obedience is socially enforced through mandatory agreement to obvious lies, and for the power of "living within the truth" (great phrase!) challenges the entire system.

I'm after something different.

2/5

jtlg.bsky.social
I've been rereading Havel, as one does in times of need.

Has anyone written a careful comparison of the greengrocer in _The Power of the Powerless_ who hangs a "Workers of the World, Unite!" sign in his window with the displays of servile flattery that Trump and Trumpism demands?

1/5