𝙰𝚛𝚊𝚜𝚑 𝙰𝚋𝚒𝚣𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚑
@abizadeh.bsky.social
7.7K followers 540 following 480 posts
Political philosophy prof at McGill https://abizadeh.wixsite.com/arash
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
abizadeh.bsky.social
I often tell my advanced graduate students who are looking to get their work published that, if you're not getting multiple journal rejections, you're not doing your job right. So, to provide continuing inspiration, I've uploaded the annual update to my CV of Journal Article Rejections:
CV of Journal Article Rejections
I often tell my advanced graduate students who are looking to get their work published that, if you're not getting multiple journal rejections, you're not doing your job right. So, to provide inspirat...
abizadeh.wixsite.com
abizadeh.bsky.social
Super interesting challenge to the current banking regime by Aaron James:
freeandequal.bsky.social
In “Money as 𝘙𝘦𝘴 𝘗𝘶𝘣𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘢,” @aaronjames.bsky.social proposes a conception of money as “common credit.” Private banks‘ powers of lending (and hence money creation/allocation) must be held in trust and subject to regulations in the service of public purposes to be legitimate.

#poliphil #PolTheory
Money as <em>Res Publica</em>
Our current monetary system is a public-private banking hybrid dominated by private interest, often at the expense of public purpose. This article proposes a conception of money as a “common credit” r...
doi.org
Reposted by 𝙰𝚛𝚊𝚜𝚑 𝙰𝚋𝚒𝚣𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚑
jandutkiewicz.bsky.social
Institutional food policy matters. When it comes to addressing food insecurity, school lunches matter most. But I would be remiss not to note mine and my co-authors' article from Lancet Planetary Health arguing that universities should lead on food sustainability.
www.thelancet.com/journals/lan...
Universities should lead on the plant-based dietary transition
As the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change1 and the EAT–Lancet Commission2 have pointed out in recent reports, substantial reductions in demand for animal-based foods are vital for achieving cli...
www.thelancet.com
abizadeh.bsky.social
it serves the purposes of determining how to fulfil our aims; of assigning responsibility and blame; and of critically assessing a society’s normative standing in light of its power structure. /5
abizadeh.bsky.social
Recognizing non-decisive, elicitory and structural, and non-causal categories of power is practically, morally, and evaluatively significant: /4
abizadeh.bsky.social
It defends the idea that one can play a causal role without making a difference; structural power as a species of “elicitory” power, which does not operate by way of one’s intentional actions; and a non-causal category of power, whereby outcomes obtain without one playing a causal role. /3
abizadeh.bsky.social
Abstract: Many theorists assume that social power operates only by way of agents’ intentional actions and their causal influence on outcomes—where causality is understood to imply making a difference. This paper challenges all three assumptions. /2
abizadeh.bsky.social
I’m thrilled that my paper “Elicitory Structural Power and Agential Power” has been accepted for publication at 𝘑𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘰𝘧 𝘌𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘤𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘚𝘰𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘗𝘩𝘪𝘭𝘰𝘴𝘰𝘱𝘩𝘺. It’s taken over 5y of rejections, so I’m especially pleased.

#poliphil #PolTheory #socialphil
Article: Elicitory Structural Power and Agential Power
Arash Abizadeh. "Elicitory Structural Power and Agential Power: An Outline and Defense." Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, forthcoming.Abstract: Many theorists assume that social power operates...
abizadeh.wixsite.com
Reposted by 𝙰𝚛𝚊𝚜𝚑 𝙰𝚋𝚒𝚣𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚑
bikewaysto.bsky.social
"bike lanes are still used as political scapegoats. But to what end? ...To deflect attention from real government failures – or from the inconvenient truth that bike lanes do not increase traffic congestion?"

www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/arti...
Opinion: The premiers are using bike lanes as a political scapegoat
Safe cycling infrastructure saves lives, but sadly, many politicians are ignoring the facts
www.theglobeandmail.com
Reposted by 𝙰𝚛𝚊𝚜𝚑 𝙰𝚋𝚒𝚣𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚑
olufemiotaiwo.bsky.social
"Jonathan Caravello...was reportedly “piled on by multiple agents all at once” as “he tried to help a man in a wheelchair” who was having difficulty moving after...[ICE] agents threw canisters of tear gas"

our colleague is still missing as of the last info I got

dailynous.com/2025/07/12/p...
Philosophy Professor Reportedly Assaulted & Abducted During ICE Raid on Farm - Daily Nous
Jonathan Caravello, a lecturer in philosophy at California State University Channel Islands, was reportedly "piled on by multiple agents all at once" as "he tried to help a man in a wheelchair" who wa...
dailynous.com
abizadeh.bsky.social
If you’re dealing with a transactional adversary, you had better game this out—elbows down capitulation at first bark could just be an invitation for more threats

/4
abizadeh.bsky.social
This means A has an incentive to make threats if A thinks B is likely to bend, but make offers if A thinks B likely won’t.

This is why elbows up makes sense:

B has lots of reasons to respond to threats with intransigeance.

/3
abizadeh.bsky.social
But there’s a basic asymmetry b/w these from A’s perspective:

A pays the cost of an offer if and only if B *complies*

whereas

A pays the enforcement cost of a threat (e.g. impose tariffs that hurt A too) if and only if B *doesn’t* comply

/2
abizadeh.bsky.social
The Digital Tax capitulation has longterm consequences. One is to reduce Cdn bargaining power. Reminder to gov about bargaining power:

If A is trying to get B to do X, A can either:

threaten: “if you don’t do X, we impose big tariffs”

Or:

make an offer: "if you do X, we scratch your back”

/1
Reposted by 𝙰𝚛𝚊𝚜𝚑 𝙰𝚋𝚒𝚣𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚑
abizadeh.bsky.social
Not only has the language evolved from “based on” to “based off of,” we now have “spaced off” for “spaced out.”

So ‘out’ and ‘on’ are out, ‘off’ is in.

Or rather: ‘Out’ and ‘on’ are off, ‘off’ is on.
abizadeh.bsky.social
As for the “chiefly”: surely it’s true of historians, but I doubt it’s quite true for someone taking a substantive philosophical approach. Causation is complicated: some are influential bc they are such powerful thinkers, which may explain both why they’re influential and why one is interested