Alew
@alew222.bsky.social
Geographer and environmental educator with 43 years experience as a professional educator, K16. Professional Development instructor in Instructional applications of GIS. FAA certified Remote Pilot.
Reposted by Alew
Reposted by Alew
The IRS agreed to share legally protected taxpayer information with DHS and ICE.
Federal law clearly protects taxpayer privacy. This agreement is illegal.
This is an assault on every single taxpayer's rights and will destroy lives.
Federal law clearly protects taxpayer privacy. This agreement is illegal.
This is an assault on every single taxpayer's rights and will destroy lives.
April 8, 2025 at 7:17 PM
The IRS agreed to share legally protected taxpayer information with DHS and ICE.
Federal law clearly protects taxpayer privacy. This agreement is illegal.
This is an assault on every single taxpayer's rights and will destroy lives.
Federal law clearly protects taxpayer privacy. This agreement is illegal.
This is an assault on every single taxpayer's rights and will destroy lives.
Reposted by Alew
I say this not to catastrophize, but the post-World War II American Century is over. Now, we navigate into the unknown of a new America. It is most important we not resign ourselves to apathy.
April 7, 2025 at 2:08 PM
I say this not to catastrophize, but the post-World War II American Century is over. Now, we navigate into the unknown of a new America. It is most important we not resign ourselves to apathy.
Reposted by Alew
I realize the Supreme Court doesn’t like to base its decisions on anything less than 250 years old, but did Roberts, with his unitary executive theory and immunity ruling, ever pause to think how that would work out if an insane person was in that position? Well, now we know!🤮
April 6, 2025 at 7:12 PM
I realize the Supreme Court doesn’t like to base its decisions on anything less than 250 years old, but did Roberts, with his unitary executive theory and immunity ruling, ever pause to think how that would work out if an insane person was in that position? Well, now we know!🤮
I’d include cabinet members as well, you know, just for giggles.
Today's message to my MAGAt Congressman:
Secretary Lutnick stated his mother-in-law wouldn’t mind if she missed her social security check and that anyone who complained would be a fraudster. Therefore, I suggest we terminate all Congressional salary and evaluate the reaction.
Secretary Lutnick stated his mother-in-law wouldn’t mind if she missed her social security check and that anyone who complained would be a fraudster. Therefore, I suggest we terminate all Congressional salary and evaluate the reaction.
March 31, 2025 at 2:07 PM
I’d include cabinet members as well, you know, just for giggles.
Reposted by Alew
Reposted by Alew
Here is my best guidance for action, rendered beautifully by the great John Lithgow. I first published these lessons more than eight years ago, in late 2016. They open the twenty chapters of "On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century."
snyder.substack.com/p/twenty-les...
snyder.substack.com/p/twenty-les...
Twenty Lessons, read by John Lithgow
Key selections from On Tyranny, for viewing and sharing
snyder.substack.com
March 30, 2025 at 2:39 PM
Here is my best guidance for action, rendered beautifully by the great John Lithgow. I first published these lessons more than eight years ago, in late 2016. They open the twenty chapters of "On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century."
snyder.substack.com/p/twenty-les...
snyder.substack.com/p/twenty-les...