Alex Parsons
@alexparsons.bsky.social
1.2K followers 850 following 2.2K posts
Democracy Programme Lead / Senior Researcher - mySociety/TheyWorkForYou. Also for some reason Postman Pat reviews.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
alexparsons.bsky.social
Today we've added some new features to TheyWorkForYou and launched an accompanying report about money in politics. See more at whofundsthem.com
WhoFundsThem
Building better information about money in politics.
whofundsthem.com
alexparsons.bsky.social
(I'm not working this week but sign up to hear about the new information we're adding toTheyWorkForYou!)
alexparsons.bsky.social
Not only will people not sue us, they'll pay us money for their characters to sell bitcoin.
crushbort.bsky.social
i think we are going to find out at some point these guys invented cocaine 2 and have been on it all along
Buried in Altman's post is the real story: "People are generating much more than we expected per user," using massive compute resources on content that's often being generated for very small audiences (it is, after all, a social media app). OpenAl will "have to somehow make money for video generation," Altman wrote. Translation: Sora is burning through compute costs with no offsetting revenue.
Altman floated a potential solution: "We are going to try sharing some of this revenue with rightsholders who want their characters generated by users." The idea-perhaps similar to You Tube's ad-monetization program for videos that include copyrighted material
-would give studios a financial incentive to opt in.
"The exact model will take some trial and error to figure out," Altman acknowledged, "but we plan to start very soon."
alexparsons.bsky.social
And somewhere in the middle you get the quadratic voting fans - whose answer is "yeees, but with diminishing returns the more you care"
alexparsons.bsky.social
Although they don't really understand each other, "no" to this question is what unites more elitist forms of electoral democracy and citizen assembly fans.
alexparsons.bsky.social
"Should people who care more get more say" is one of the interesting democratic divides.
deargodwhatnow.bsky.social
It's vastly underappreciated imho how a small number of dedicated and unified people can push through a huge amount of social change, whether you like them or not
alexparsons.bsky.social
Yeah real double edged sword that one.
alexparsons.bsky.social
I was experimenting with "can it help me find someone who's talked about this from this angle" and it referenced a real report that wasn't available on the internet and started making up direct quotes.
alexparsons.bsky.social
"give me supporting evidence for this" is one of the most dangerous uses. It will definitely give you something.
gavin-kelly.bsky.social
I expect we'll be seeing a lot more of this.
alexparsons.bsky.social
(More on that second one in a few weeks)
alexparsons.bsky.social
In general, citizens assemblies have a really clear role for areas where elected representatives have a conflict of interest (setting the rules of politics) or where politicians making decisions *creates* conflicts of interest (e.g. distributing public funding for scrutiny).
alexparsons.bsky.social
Looks like the IPSA citizens forum has now happened, would be interesting to see when the full thing is published www.theguardian.com/politics/202...
Walker also said Ipsa was working towards increasing public understanding about the way MPs were funded, with pay currently set at £93,904 a year, and the annual maximum for costs associated with their works at £250,000.

After setting up an independently run “citizens’ forum” to debate the issue, she said the group changed their views on MPs’ pay. They “mostly believe MPs’ pay is fair, but that it should remain grounded in the context of the wider social and economic realities facing ordinary working people”, Walker said. After the exercise, Ipsa is proposing that the way it sets MP pay should be “based on the main recommendations made by the citizens’ forum”. Some other findings of the forum were that MPs’ pay could be benchmarked against comparable roles in the public service and similar democracies; be linked in part to national average household income; and reflect the demanding nature of the role.
alexparsons.bsky.social
Adding to the thread; bsky.app/profile/acas...
acastroaraujo.bsky.social
"The guts of institutions is that somebody somewhere really cares to hold an organization to the standards and is often paid to do that."
mcopelov.bsky.social
We have institutions in place to address both of these problems, but they require people who swore oaths on Bibles to the country & Constitution to do their damn jobs.
alexparsons.bsky.social
Few things on this.

More can be done to detect and prompt MPs with ongoing interests to be up to date. Parliament needs to see data quality as an institutional problem rather than a individual matter.

research.mysociety.org/html/beyond-...
alexparsons.bsky.social
Some good numbers in quoted tweet for the transition to post-social media alexparsons.co.uk/blog/posts/2...
Reposted by Alex Parsons
drewharwell.com
OpenAI employees are very excited about how well their new AI tool can create fake videos of people doing crimes and have definitely thought through all the implications of this
alexparsons.bsky.social
Post-social media giants having shed their social graph might find they have no moat (which might be an even tougher situation to regulate) alexparsons.co.uk/blog/posts/2...
Post-Social Media
Social media sheds its most unreliable component: other people
alexparsons.co.uk
alexparsons.bsky.social
And fully open models make the social debate more complicated because it puts the lie to the idea LLMs have to depend on theft, while still potentially having a big social impact.
alexparsons.bsky.social
LLMs being everywhere while all existing AI companies have gone bust is one version of the future.
alexparsons.bsky.social
Been doing some work using open models locally and it's really reinforced how LLMs are a useful technology while the broader AI business models make no sense.
ryanlcooper.com
"Plan for a future where you can buy GPUs for ten cents on the dollar, where there's a buyer's market for hiring skilled applied statisticians, and where there's a ton of extremely promising open source models" pluralistic.net/2025/09/27/e...
Pluralistic: The real (economic) AI apocalypse is nigh (27 Sep 2025) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow
pluralistic.net
Reposted by Alex Parsons
qjurecic.bsky.social
(Battle Hymn of the Republic plays in the background)
sellars.bsky.social
AAUP v. Rubio is out, and look at how it starts. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
Ahead of the case caption, a handwritten note: "Trump has pardons and tanks . . . . what do you have?" Judge Young's reply: "Dear Mr. or Ms. Anonymous,
Alone, I have nothing but my
sense of duty.
Together, We the People of the
United States –- you and me --
have our magnificent Constitution.
Here’s how that works out in a
specific case –- "
alexparsons.bsky.social
My "is this actually really core or is it wrecking by expanding the scope" question is if House of Lords reform should be in the same discussion.