Lightnews — Scholar-powered news

Reposted by Alex Albright

Paul Goldsmith-Pinkham @paulgp.com · 13h

Posted a short blog post with updated data (and public repo with data) of current state of Econ job market:

paulgp.com/2025/10/08/j...

2 10 34

Reposted by Alex Albright

Sandy Black @econsandy.bsky.social · Aug 19

Society of Labor Economists (SoLE) Annual Conference will be May 1-2, 2026 in Denver, Colorado. Submission portal is now open! Deadline for submissions is October 31--don't forget to submit! It will be a great conference! (organized by me and @jrothst.bsky.social)

mailchi.mp/sole-jole/so...

SOLE 2026 Submissions Open

mailchi.mp

37 68

Reposted by Alex Albright

Julia M. Rohrer @dingdingpeng.the100.ci · Aug 25

Ever stared at a table of regression coefficients & wondered what you're doing with your life?

Very excited to share this gentle introduction to another way of making sense of statistical models (w @vincentab.bsky.social)
Preprint: doi.org/10.31234/osf...
Website: j-rohrer.github.io/marginal-psy...

Models as Prediction Machines: How to Convert Confusing Coefficients into Clear Quantities

Abstract
Psychological researchers usually make sense of regression models by interpreting coefficient estimates directly. This works well enough for simple linear models, but is more challenging for more complex models with, for example, categorical variables, interactions, non-linearities, and hierarchical structures. Here, we introduce an alternative approach to making sense of statistical models. The central idea is to abstract away from the mechanics of estimation, and to treat models as “counterfactual prediction machines,” which are subsequently queried to estimate quantities and conduct tests that matter substantively. This workflow is model-agnostic; it can be applied in a consistent fashion to draw causal or descriptive inference from a wide range of models. We illustrate how to implement this workflow with the marginaleffects package, which supports over 100 different classes of models in R and Python, and present two worked examples. These examples show how the workflow can be applied across designs (e.g., observational study, randomized experiment) to answer different research questions (e.g., associations, causal effects, effect heterogeneity) while facing various challenges (e.g., controlling for confounders in a flexible manner, modelling ordinal outcomes, and interpreting non-linear models).

Figure illustrating model predictions. On the X-axis the predictor, annual gross income in Euro. On the Y-axis the outcome, predicted life satisfaction. A solid line marks the curve of predictions on which individual data points are marked as model-implied outcomes at incomes of interest. Comparing two such predictions gives us a comparison. We can also fit a tangent to the line of predictions, which illustrates the slope at any given point of the curve.

A figure illustrating various ways to include age as a predictor in a model. On the x-axis age (predictor), on the y-axis the outcome (model-implied importance of friends, including confidence intervals).

Illustrated are
1. age as a categorical predictor, resultings in the predictions bouncing around a lot with wide confidence intervals
2. age as a linear predictor, which forces a straight line through the data points that has a very tight confidence band and
3. age splines, which lies somewhere in between as it smoothly follows the data but has more uncertainty than the straight line.

49 280 940

Reposted by Alex Albright

Hannah Recht @hannahrecht.bsky.social · Aug 11

🚀 I made a tracker that shows when the Census Bureau adds or removes datasets from their APIs.
Dashboard at www.hrecht.com/census-api-d... and follow @censusapitracker.bsky.social for major updates.

I've been wanting to build this for years but now seemed an especially important time to keep track.

Tracking Census Dataset Changes

See when the U.S. Census Bureau adds or removes datasets.

www.hrecht.com

4 29 58

Alex Albright @allbriteallday.bsky.social · Jul 8

Academics responding to referee reports

1 6

Reposted by Alex Albright

Emma Wiles @emmawiles.bsky.social · Mar 24

TLDR: AI caused a lot more job posts, but no more jobs!

While the intervention did save employers time, the welfare loss to jobseekers from time wasted on applications is 6x the size of the welfare gain to employers. Suggests widespread use of LLMs can harm market efficiency.

5 20

Reposted by Alex Albright

Emma Wiles @emmawiles.bsky.social · Mar 24

🚨 New paper alert, with @johnjhorton.bsky.social! Using an experiment run on a large online labor market, we provide evidence that providing employers access to an AI-written first draft of a job post harms the efficiency of the market.

emmawiles.github.io/storage/jobo...

8 29 90

Reposted by Alex Albright

Katie Drummond @katie-drummond.bsky.social · Mar 24

Is AI liberating human programmers—or programming them right out of their jobs?

At @wired.com we kept hearing conflicting accounts, so we surveyed 730 coders and developers at every career stage about how (and how often) they use AI chatbots on the job:

www.wired.com/story/how-so...

How Software Engineers Actually Use AI

We surveyed 730 coders and developers about how (and how often) they use AI chatbots on the job. The results amazed and disturbed us.

www.wired.com

4 25 86

Alex Albright @allbriteallday.bsky.social · Apr 14

Tagging one of the three authors here: @joakimweill.bsky.social

1 1

Alex Albright @allbriteallday.bsky.social · Apr 14

Important paper on the home insurance market. Authors use novel data on 15 million insurance policies + document many new descriptive facts.

For instance, "the average person’s homeowners insurance [costs] 17% of their monthly principal and interest payment."

papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

This paper leverages novel data on 15 million home insurance policies to understand how credit scores and natural disaster risks affect the price of home insurance. We find that individuals with subprime credit pay 30% more for home insurance than individuals with super-prime credit. These differences are not explained by property or contract-level characteristics, and likely reflect how insurers use credit score to price anticipated future claim filing behavior. Leveraging a house-level match with a proprietary disaster risk model, we find that the passthrough of expected annual disaster losses is close to one on average, higher than one for individuals with lower credit scores, and below one in high insurance-regulation states like California. We show that despite a passthrough rate for disaster risk close to one, disaster risks account for less than a quarter of premiums on average, and around a third in high-risk states like Florida and Louisiana. These findings reveal that at the policy-level, the disaster risk component of insurance prices is on average smaller than the discount given to people with high credit scores. Insurance prices often depend more on who lives in a home than on the disaster risk a home is exposed to

1 3 19

Reposted by Alex Albright

Claire Adida @claireadida.bsky.social · Mar 7

The Deportation Data Project collects and posts public, anonymized U.S. government immigration enforcement datasets. A public good provided by academics and lawyers at Berkeley, UCLA, Stanford, Yale, and Columbia.

Deportation Data Project

deportationdata.org

1 44 84

Alex Albright @allbriteallday.bsky.social · Apr 9

Also, the authors "find that local tax assessors: 1) have tax assessments on their own properties significantly lower than neighboring properties; and 2) these tax assessments grow significantly slower than neighbors – lowering their tax bills." 👀

Image via: www.library.hbs.edu/working-know...

Image reads: "Recognizing that the system allows municipalities to adjust variables to stabilize revenue, the researchers wondered if it also created unintended opportunities for manipulation and self-dealing. To answer that question, they collected data on the homes of local tax assessors. They found that, on average, assessments on those properties grew 0.7 percentage points more slowly each year than those of similar homes nearby. This slight annual difference adds up to a significant 20-to-24 percent gap in the assessed values of the two sets of properties over the study period."

3

Alex Albright @allbriteallday.bsky.social · Apr 9

TIL "property tax revenues adjust at a pace that is inconsistent with property values in the US."

And this revenue smoothing is not symmetric: "municipalities are significantly more likely to reassess in up markets as opposed to down."

H/t @nber.org WP by Chen & Cohen: www.nber.org/papers/w33238

image shows abstract of the nber working paper. here's the abstract: "Property tax revenues – the largest discretionary source of revenue for local governments - adjust at a pace that is inconsistent with property values in the US. We show that this form of revenue smoothing may be rooted in the political economy of municipalities. Measures of local budget stressors are positively related to upward assessments of a property’s value. Moreover, municipalities are significantly more likely to reassess in up markets as opposed to down – consistent with maximizing tax base and revenue collected. Using micro-level evidence from justpassing school referenda in Illinois, these shocks to municipal liabilities lead to significant increases in property assessments without any associated increases in market values or transactions. Passing a referendum over the prior 3 years increases the probability that a house is reassessed upward by 23%. This flexible form of revenue smoothing creates avenues for personal rent extraction. We find that local tax assessors: 1) have tax assessments on their own properties significantly lower than neighboring properties; and 2) these tax assessments grow significantly slower than neighbors – lowering their tax bills. We further document a significant connection between the underassessment of tax assessors’ own properties and the tax-maximizing assessment gaps documented in the districts they operate."

1 6

Reposted by Alex Albright

Sam Dodini @microsamonomics.bsky.social · Apr 8

🚨🚨
What happens when you take a bunch of human capital out of a local economy? Is brain drain a real thing? And what are the consequences? In a new paper, we shed light on this in the context of highly developed economies: Sweden and Norway. #Econsky

1 6 13

Reposted by Alex Albright

Emma Pierson @emmapierson.bsky.social · Mar 28

Migration data is critical in the health, environmental, and social sciences.

We're releasing a new dataset, MIGRATE: annual flows between 47 billion pairs of US Census areas. MIGRATE is:

- 4600x more granular than existing public data
- highly correlated with external ground-truth data

1/2

2 4 28

Reposted by Alex Albright

Jacque Schrag @jacqueschrag.com · Mar 18

Grateful for small joys these days, like a little more sunlight every day. Fun little map I made last week 📊

Axios @axios.com · Mar 18

Parts of the U.S. will gain three hours or more of daylight between Thursday's spring equinox and the summer solstice on June 20, per NOAA's solar calculator.

How much daylight you're gaining as spring begins

Parts of the U.S. will gain 3 hours or more of daylight over the next few months.

www.axios.com

2 8 38

Reposted by Alex Albright

James Feigenbaum @jamesfeigenbaum.bsky.social · Mar 5

NEW PAPER: "Examining the role of training data for supervised methods of automated record linkage: Lessons for best practice in economic history" with Jonas Helgertz and Joe Price now forthcoming (and nicely proofed) at Explorations in Economic History 🧵 authors.elsevier.com/c/1kiv03I~dW...

authors.elsevier.com

2 7 26

Alex Albright @allbriteallday.bsky.social · Feb 20

If you:

- received your PhD in 2017-2024 &
- have early-stage research you're looking to present

=> submit to the ✨Early Career Workshop✨!

1 3

Alex Albright @allbriteallday.bsky.social · Feb 20

Hey #econsky! FYI: our @oiginstitute.bsky.social annual research conference is Nov 13-14, 2025!

- Nov 13 is the main conference day ft. keynote by David Card
- Nov 14 is a workshop day for early career researchers

Learn more + submit here (deadline: 4/11): www.minneapolisfed.org/institute/co...

Call for Papers | Opportunity & Inclusive Growth Institute

www.minneapolisfed.org

1 4 10

Reposted by Alex Albright

Jesse Rothstein @jrothst.bsky.social · Feb 5

I just found out that @epi.org has updated and modernized its invaluable archive of State of Working America data and tabulations. Check it out! data.epi.org

HT: @benzipperer.org

Topics - EPI Library

The EPI Data Library offers comprehensive, up-to-date labor data from Economic Policy Institute analysis, covering wages, inequality, and economic trends across demographics.

data.epi.org

8 29

Reposted by Alex Albright

Christian Traxler @chtraxler.bsky.social · Jan 29

Happy to share that @annabindler.bsky.social & I will organize the 16th #TWEC Transatlantic Workshop on the Economics of Crime in Berlin.

Save the date: 26-27 September 2025.

CfP follows next month #econsky

2 21 31

Reposted by Alex Albright

CSWEP @aeacswep.bsky.social · Jan 28

Based on feedback from past participants, potential applicants, and mentors, the CeMENT workshop will now be held June 30 - July 2, 2025, at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. To apply, go to: www.aeaweb.org/about-aea/co...
Deadline to apply is March 15.

CeMENT: Mentoring for Junior Faculty

www.aeaweb.org

12 11

Reposted by Alex Albright

Aria Golestani @ariagolestani.bsky.social · Jan 16

📣 Submit your crime paper by Feb 14.

🔸 4th Workshop on the Economics of Crime for Junior Scholars
🔸 29-30 May, 2025
🔸 Quattrone Center, UPenn
🔸 Keynote: @amandayagan.bsky.social
🔹 Send your paper to:
[email protected]

@emmarackstraw.bsky.social

12 13

Reposted by Alex Albright

David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · Jan 21

2/ If you combine most Americans not reading much and a few reading a lot, you've got some Power Law nonsense developing! The 4% of adults who read 50 or more books did at least 28% of ~all the country's reading~ — more than the bottom 80% combined.

The top 20% read 75% of all books.

A bar/area chart with the title, "20% of American adults do 75% of the country's book reading."

2 9 28

Reposted by Alex Albright

David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · Jan 21

At the end of the year, I ran a poll for @today.yougov.com asking people how many books they read in 2024. The answer is not many! The median American read ~2 books~ last year; 38% of Americans didn't read ANY.

But... 1/

Bar chart with the title "Most Americans didn't read many books last year"

5 8 36