Lightnews — Scholar-powered news

Andy Miller @andymiller24.bsky.social · 1d

Must be a hot one - The Atlantic's site is down.

1

Andy Miller @andymiller24.bsky.social · 1d

The thread of the day! 👇

Faine Greenwood @faineg.bsky.social · 1d

i have met a number of pigs, including pigs i later went on to eat (we have small farmers in our family) and quite frankly, getting to know pigs has made me feel even less bad about eating them

they would 100% eat us if given the chance

1

Reposted by Andy Miller

Garrett M. Graff @vermontgmg.bsky.social · 1d

All year, we’ve seen this administration treat appropriations bills less as laws-to-follow and more like Lucy playing football with Charlie Brown. What should make this moment any different? www.doomsdayscenario.co/p/there-is-n...

There is no budget "deal" to be made

President Trump in has so broken the constitutional framework as to make joint normal, responsible government impossible.

www.doomsdayscenario.co

10 110 250

Andy Miller @andymiller24.bsky.social · 3d

Efficient. Rather than taking these on one at a time throughout the day, get 'em all taken care of at once and have the rest of the day off!

2

Reposted by Andy Miller

Kathy Mulvey @kathymulvey.bsky.social · 8d

Who wrote the Trump administration's sham climate report? Learn more in my latest blog about the record of #climatedisinformation, scientific contrarianism and ties to the #fossilfuel industry of the so-called “Climate Working Group” report authors. #climatedeception blog.ucs.org/kathy-mulvey...

Who Wrote the Trump Administration’s Flawed Climate Report? Meet the Architects of Disinformation

This month, the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) filed comments and submitted a letter signed by more than 1,000 scientists opposing the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) proposal to rescin...

blog.ucs.org

11 17

Andy Miller @andymiller24.bsky.social · 8d

Same as Brian Cook @2ndadminstate.bsky.social
www.environmentalprotectionnetwork.org/wp-content/u...

www.environmentalprotectionnetwork.org

1 1

Reposted by Andy Miller

Jeff Goodell @jeffgoodell.bsky.social · 8d

Countdown to the number of days before Chris Wright starts referring to coal as "buried sunshine."

Jeff Goodell @jeffgoodell.bsky.social · 9d

Wrote this 20 years ago, as a proud member of the chardonnay set (aka the isn't-there-a-better-cheaper-less destructive-way- to-generate-electricity-than-burning-rocks set)

3 16 43

Andy Miller @andymiller24.bsky.social · 9d

Well worth the time to read. Why logic doesn't work with many hard-core Trump supporters.

Matthew Sheffield @matthew.flux.community · 9d

🧵The Trump regime knows that they are destroying the economy. They will never admit this in public, but they do in private.

Treasury secretary Scott Bessent was photographed reading a text from AgSec Brooke Rollins saying that Trump's tariffs made China shift soybean purchases to Argentina.

1 4

Andy Miller @andymiller24.bsky.social · 10d

I grew up in a small town in NM (~5k people). "Big" cities (20k+) were indeed seen as scary. IMHO, it wasn't race as much as crime reporting. Crime makes the news, normalcy doesn't. Actually visiting or living in truly big cities is very different than the perception, but the perception dies hard.

1 4

Andy Miller @andymiller24.bsky.social · 15d

Outstanding work from climate.us.

3

Andy Miller @andymiller24.bsky.social · 15d

The most powerful demonstration of the importance of EPA's research to protecting and improving public health and the environment is the administration's effort to halt and undermine that research. Also true for NOAA, NASA, NSF, NIH, CDC...
www.eenews.net/articles/epa...

EPA reorganization sparks fears of ‘political interference’

“Today is day one of the new EPA,” Administrator Lee Zeldin said. Union officials say the revamp is meant to intimidate scientists and undermine

www.eenews.net

1 4

Andy Miller @andymiller24.bsky.social · 16d

It's worth considering, but we need to be very clear about what we can and can't know in advance. For instance, projecting the responses of complex ecosystems over century time frames is dicey, to say the least (also true for climate change alone).

Zeke Hausfather @hausfath.bsky.social · 17d

This raises a question worth debating: would it be worth considering putting a tiny portion of the sulfur we currently emit into the upper atmosphere to reflect sunlight and compensate for additional warming we will experience as we cut air pollution?

Andy Miller @andymiller24.bsky.social · 18d

Ignoring facts that contradict ideology never ends well.

The Washington Post @washingtonpost.com · 18d

Breaking news: The Environmental Protection Agency has ordered scientists in at least one of its research offices to immediately pause almost all research and stop publishing their studies.

EPA tells scientists to stop publishing studies, employees say

Staff from the EPA’s Office of Water were summoned to a town hall meeting this week and told to pause the publication of most research, pending a review.

wapo.st

1

Andy Miller @andymiller24.bsky.social · 19d

Outstanding!

2

Andy Miller @andymiller24.bsky.social · 19d

The Academies committee did a spectacular job of sticking to the science, demonstrating the solid scientific basis of the Endangerment Finding, and crushing Koonin's 'red team.' The committee's choice to simply review changes in the science since 2009 and avoid the DOE report was simply brilliant.

Zeke Hausfather @hausfath.bsky.social · 21d

A new report by the prestigious US National Academy of Sciences concludes that the EPA’s 2009 endangerment finding was accurate, has stood the test of time, and is now reinforced by even stronger evidence:

Effects of Human-Caused Greenhouse Gas Emissions on U.S. Climate, Health, and Welfare | The National Academies Press

Read online, download a free PDF, or order a copy in print.

nap.nationalacademies.org

Reposted by Andy Miller

Andrew Dessler @andrewdessler.com · 20d

New from me on The Climate Brink: The Cartoon Villain's Guide to Killing Climate Action
www.theclimatebrink....

1 12 36

Andy Miller @andymiller24.bsky.social · 21d

ICYMI: NASEM is releasing its report on the Effects of GHGs on US climate, health, and welfare. This is in response to the recent, infamous DOE climate report. This afternoon at 1 EDT. Should be interesting....
www.nationalacademies.org/event/45701_...

www.nationalacademies.org

2

Andy Miller @andymiller24.bsky.social · 27d

Ah, our old friend Steve Milloy still at it. Doing everything by EO is fine until it's a D in office, in which case EOs are tyranny.

Andy Miller @andymiller24.bsky.social · 27d

Your book is outstanding. It pulled threads together in a exceptionally personal way so that the reader could gain a sense of what it was like in the moment and in the place.

1

Andy Miller @andymiller24.bsky.social · 27d

Absolutely.

Andy Miller @andymiller24.bsky.social · 27d

Whatever happens, it’s ultimately EPA’s responsibility to use quality scientific information. At least in a sane world. My guess is that they don’t care. IMO, EPA is using this to create a precedent to use whatever info they find to support their case. Which will also apply to other agencies. [5/5]

1

Andy Miller @andymiller24.bsky.social · 27d

Even if DOE adequately responds to the 60k comments (highly unlikely), EPA will still need to contend with the NASEM report. EPA can remove sections of the rule that rely on the report, ask DOE to revise the report, respond themselves, or ignore the comments altogether. [4/5]

1

Andy Miller @andymiller24.bsky.social · 27d

The real issue is with EPA and its use of the report in the rule. Unless DOE makes major revisions (basically a new report), the scientific quality doesn’t meet EPA standards. In that case, and if DOE retains or withdraws, it’s up to EPA to respond to criticisms of the report. [3/5]

1

Andy Miller @andymiller24.bsky.social · 27d

Implications for the report are (mostly) not complicated. DOE can retain w/o revision, revise, or withdraw the report. There may be some scientific integrity issues with revising the report, unless the authors remain involved in an unofficial capacity. Otherwise, it’s straightforward. [2/5]

1

Andy Miller @andymiller24.bsky.social · 27d

Not a lawyer but know a bit about the processes. 1: staying out of court allows EPA to proceed apace with their rule. 2: this removes discovery, which I suspect would show the CWG’s intent was to support EPA’s position, demonstrating scientific bias. [1/5]

1 1