Lightnews — Scholar-powered news

Atheendar Venkataramani @atheendar.bsky.social · 1d

Elizabeth - you are the best.

Reposted by Atheendar Venkataramani

Elizabeth Wrigley-Field @wrigleyfield.bsky.social · 1d

New podcast episode where I talk about what's going on with mortality in the US

A wide-ranging discussion of what happened before the pandemic & what's happened since then; racial disparities and how to get our heads around their scope; why things might be going so badly for Millennials & Gen Zers

Prof. Elizabeth Wrigley-Field Discusses Excess Deaths

Because the US death rate has exceeded that of 21 other high income countries for over four decades, an estimated 14.7 million US lives have been lost since1980.

www.thehealthcarepolicypodcast.com

3 19 55

Reposted by Atheendar Venkataramani

David Evans @daveevansphd.bsky.social · 1d

Is there a tool to assess risk of bias that economists commonly use or like?

Most tools I've seen seem to be built around medical studies (whether experimental or quasi-experimental). Some elements seem relevant but many others less so.

2 2

Atheendar Venkataramani @atheendar.bsky.social · 1d

I am currently living this reality on three different papers, one of which is 15 years old.

1 8

Reposted by Atheendar Venkataramani

Rafe Meager (they/them) @economeager.bsky.social · 1d

(1) banger
(2) i wish non-economists would realise just how much time each economics paper takes to write (because of our norms about how thorough each paper has to be)

Seema Jayachandran @seema.bsky.social · 1d

We just spent 6 months to add 1 figure to this paper. Some people said, "Couples aren't prioritizing men's careers. Men just have better earnings opportunities when moving."

Earnings effects of moves for couples on the left, singles on the right. Negligible gap between single men and women.

Event study coefficients that show that men's earnings rise more than women's among couples following a cross-commuting zone move (left panels). The pattern is muted or reverses among single men and single women (right panels).

3 29 160

Atheendar Venkataramani @atheendar.bsky.social · 1d

For you, I will stay

1

Atheendar Venkataramani @atheendar.bsky.social · 1d

I did a five month experiment where I signed off all social media. I felt smarter + less angry and distracted.

Alex de Campi @alexdecampi.bsky.social · 1d

A thought I keep having: what if I just log off all social media and subscribe to a few paper magazines and newspapers instead

1 1 4

Reposted by Atheendar Venkataramani

Population Aging Research Center @pennaging.bsky.social · 1d

This @pennldi.bsky.social post discusses recent Op-Ed: ldi.upenn.edu/our-work/res...

↪️ Public Policies, Social Narratives, and Population Health in @NEJM.org
doi.org/10.1056/NEJM...

by PARC Research Associate Atheendar Venkataramani @atheendar.bsky.social

Read more below:

PennMedCSO (@pennmedcso.bsky.social)

In @nejm.org, Atheendar Venkataramani (@pennmehp.bsky.social) & co discuss how public policies, by way of the social narratives they reinforce, can affect health by mechanisms that are independent of…

bsky.app

3 2

Reposted by Atheendar Venkataramani

Aaron Schwartz @aschwartz.bsky.social · 2d

Today's Nobel Prize in Medicine went to the discoverers of regulatory T-cells. How could this discovery about our immune systems change the world?

Here is one possible way: leading to treatments for terrible neurological diseases. (1/3)

1 5 15

Atheendar Venkataramani @atheendar.bsky.social · 2d

Thank you for all these tips!! I like the manual car analogy

1

Atheendar Venkataramani @atheendar.bsky.social · 2d

Oh that's awesome! Thanks for the tip!!

2

Atheendar Venkataramani @atheendar.bsky.social · 2d

That's true. I left X some months ago because no one saw or engaged with my tweets. And it got weird.

1 2

Atheendar Venkataramani @atheendar.bsky.social · 2d

Why do people think this website is good? No one is engaging. There is little discussion. It's just all of us saying stuff in parallel.

7 1 6

Reposted by Atheendar Venkataramani

Chelsea Parlett @chelseaparlett.bsky.social · 5d

It’s not the method that makes you causal it’s the assumptions

5 18 87

Reposted by Atheendar Venkataramani

Mirya R. Holman @mirya.bsky.social · 5d

"Full-day kindergarten expansions were responsible for as much as 24 percent of the growth in employment of mothers with kindergartenaged children in this time frame."

AEA Journals @aeajournals.bsky.social · 5d

Forthcoming in AEJ: Economic Policy: "A Matter of Time? Measuring Effects of Public Schooling Expansions on Families" by Chloe R. Gibbs, Jocelyn Wikle, and Riley Wilson. www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=...

A Matter of Time? Measuring Effects of Public Schooling Expansions on Families

(Forthcoming Article) - We leverage pronounced changes in the availability of public schooling for young children— through duration expansions to the kindergarten day—to better understand how an impli...

www.aeaweb.org

1 22 51

Atheendar Venkataramani @atheendar.bsky.social · 5d

It's a really beautiful and important paper. Congratulations!

1 2

Reposted by Atheendar Venkataramani

JAMA @jama.com · 5d

Atul Butte, MD, PhD, helped define the field of translational bioinformatics and inspired countless colleagues and trainees.

He will be remembered for his brilliant mind, infectious optimism, generous mentorship.

Remembering Atul Butte

This Medical News article is in remembrance of Atul Butte, MD, PhD, a pioneer in using data science to improve health.

jamanetwork.com

2 16 67

Atheendar Venkataramani @atheendar.bsky.social · 6d

Missing data means AI will be as dumb as we are?

Interesting paper: arxiv.org/abs/2509.12388

1 3

Reposted by Atheendar Venkataramani

Trevon Logan @trevondlogan.bsky.social · 9d

Good history helps us avoid nostalgia. The great article “Economic History and the Historians” (2020) by Anne McCants reminds me why nostalgia can get us in trouble. Two of her examples are very relevant to today: vaccinations and the popular narrative of some economic “good old days.”

Getting vaccinated is unpleasant. Dying of measles is worse. In the decade before the 1963 vaccine for measles emerged, an average of 475 Americans died from measles every year, most of them children. This (absolute) number had dropped to a low of 1 in 1981, despite a steadily increasing population that might have hypothetically contributed additional cases. Sadly, the number of measles cases in the United States has been steadily climbing upward again because we seem not to remember the ravages of the disease so much as the inconvenience of the shot—even without taking into account the absurd rejection of the solid scientific evidence in favor of vaccinations. Many people still have an elderly relative who survived a bout of severe childhood illness; not one of us has an elderly relative who did not. The blurring of the historical evidence for and against vaccination that arises from strangely incongruous historical narratives allows a seemingly inconsequential but nonetheless deadly nostalgia to run rampant.

Another example of dangerous reverence for the past concerns the flurry of popular enthusiasm lately (at least if the pundits of the 2016 American election are to be believed) for the “good old days” of the 1950s when a family could live securely on just one income (in these nostalgic accounts, that one income is usually a man’s). Lest we forget, these are the same good old days of poor air quality and measles. Maybe trivial in comparison but certainly indicative of the scope of the cognitive problem that nostalgia presents, the average size of a new home built in America in 1950 was 983 sq. ft.; by 2010, the average size had risen to 2,392 sq. ft. Given that families were larger on average in the 1950s than they were in 2010, per capita space allocation had risen even faster than total area. Although we might not need that much personal space, many of us have become used to it. Older furniture now looks tiny compared to what is now on offer in showrooms, whereas older television sets were behemoths with miniscule screens showing programs in glorious black and white.

2 39 110

Reposted by Atheendar Venkataramani

Kathryn Anne Edwards @kedseconomist.com · 8d

Can you get help when you lose your job?

A lot of Americans' introduction to Unemployment Insurance is anything but easy. Laid off, they have to navigate an application process that could result in not that much money.

Optimists, we can do better. Tune in:
rss.com/podcasts/opt...

Can We Fix America's Broken Unemployment Insurance System? | Podcast Episode on RSS.com

Just how broken is Unemployment Insurance? Consider this: During every recession since the 1950s, the federal government has had to step in and prop it up. Of people looking for work, only half qualif...

rss.com

1 14

Atheendar Venkataramani @atheendar.bsky.social · 8d

Whoa...

Atheendar Venkataramani @atheendar.bsky.social · 15d

Ooh!! it wasn't the one I had seen but this one is new to me, looks awesome, and I'm really glad you posted this!

3

Atheendar Venkataramani @atheendar.bsky.social · 15d

Hi all!

A while back on X and here people circulated an article on mono-causal versus multi-causal explanations (couched in a discourse on complex systems) for different phenomena.

Does anyone have a link or citation?

#research #medsky #econsky

1 1 5

Atheendar Venkataramani @atheendar.bsky.social · 16d

This is an interesting article on the #NIH, the #future of #science, and whether science and #reason can thrive in this era of toxic information ecosystems and politics.

www.nytimes.com/2025/09/22/o...

(I know a lot of academics have issues with this piece. But there is a lot to think about here)

Opinion | ‘The Power of Science to Solve Problems Is Almost Limitless’

www.nytimes.com

1 1 1

Atheendar Venkataramani @atheendar.bsky.social · 20d

Congratulations Corinne! I pre-ordered this and am exciting to read next week!

1 1