policy via some Time magazine headlines you saw in 1982, which as far as you know was ten years ago

More on the deliberate betrayal of professional norms at the hands of the most privileged academics.

We are calling for a stop to "Mutual Recognition" of these dangerous standards. Trade deals shouldn't come at the cost of lives on our streets.

Read more about the risks here:
etsc.eu/accepting-us...

these people are fraudsters selling snake oil and after their reforms crash and burn they'll be on to the next institution to do the same song and dance

This case in LA raises questions about video these bots collect, how it’s stored, retained, and available to police or potentially sold to other third parties.

To add onto this: a lot of people in legal media and the legal profession want to believe in the impartiality of the SCOTUS. The talking point that “John Roberts cares about his legacy and the appearance of the SCOTUS” has been parroted so often, do we even know that it’s ever been true?

I'm absolutely not an MMT Partisan, I'm sure it's as flawed as any of the other post Keynesian subschools, but the way in which people with their trousers round their ankles and their bare arses flapping in the wind discuss it is really quite something.

If MMT is as bad as you say it is then you need to come up with your own explanation for why everything sucks and nothing works, and how it can be fixed, because abundance, vibecession and "just let us raise taxes a bit" ain't it lads.