Birgit Schmidt
LightNews LightNews
bschmid1.bsky.social
Birgit Schmidt
@bschmid1.bsky.social
380 followers 530 following 7 posts
Open Science enthusiast & head of Knowledge Commons at University of Göttingen (UGOE) / State and University Library | Also at @[email protected]

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8036-5859
Posts Replies Media Videos
Reposted by Birgit Schmidt
dans-knaw-nwo.bsky.social
CESSDA's Monitoring Report shows a growing focus on dataset citation. Repositories like DANS now add recommended citations to dataset pages, simplifying user referencing + boosting data visibility in scholarly work. As CESSDA partner, DANS supports clear citation practices. Read more: edu.nl/xyyee
CESSDA report on the importance of data citation - DANS
edu.nl
December 22, 2025 at 9:01 AM
Reposted by Birgit Schmidt
amlibraryassoc.bsky.social
Lie #1: Libraries indoctrinate. Truth: Censoring library books by removing them from libraries or prohibiting them from the shelves in the first place is indoctrination. https://www.oif.ala.org/lies-about-libraries-part-one/
Lies About Libraries (Part One)
Welcome to the first in a series of posts dedicated to debunking false claims used to undermine trust in libraries and attack those who work in them.
www.oif.ala.org
December 18, 2025 at 9:29 PM
Reposted by Birgit Schmidt
steamtraen.eu
New editorial with John Carlisle:

Detecting inconsistencies and fraud in research data: Time for authors to share the data underlying their summary statistics as a matter of course

tl;dr Let's stop doing party tricks

journals.lww.com/anesthesia-a...

Final draft: docs.google.com/document/d/1...
December 17, 2025 at 5:54 PM
Reposted by Birgit Schmidt
forbetterscience.bsky.social
Schneider Shorts 19.12.2025 – Merry Christmas!
forbetterscience.com/2025/12/19/s...
Schneider Shorts 19.12.2025 – Merry Christmas!
Schneider Shorts 19.12.2025- sleuth wins reward in a lawsuit, an Italian cheater can’t stop lying, with retractions for failed and failing science elites, a Nature expert investigation, and U…
forbetterscience.com
December 19, 2025 at 6:06 AM
bschmid1.bsky.social
youtube.com/watch?v=Z5Pl...
Ed Zitron Dispels the Myth of the AI Revolution
YouTube video by Newsweek
youtube.com
December 14, 2025 at 1:14 PM
Reposted by Birgit Schmidt
deevybee.bsky.social
Hello @springernature.com - you’ve just published another bit of nonsense in Scientific Reports 🙁
jacksonwryan.com Jack Ryan 🙏🧪 @jacksonwryan.com · Nov 27
Uhh,,, Figure 1 shows you... what exactly? Trying to understand Medical fryrmbial, runctitional features and mum's legs going through concrete.

This whole article is a bit of a disaster. And it's very difficult to find other published work for the author. Strange! 🧪

(via @smutclyde.bsky.social)
Text says: This section provides a comprehensive description of the methodology employed in this study to develop an explainable XAI framework for ASD diagnosis and parental support. The proposed framework integrates the TabPFNMix regressor, a state-of-the-art machine learning (ML) model for tabular data, with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to ensure both high predictive accuracy and interpretability. The methodology is structured into five subsections: (1) Dataset Description, (2) TabPFNMix Overview, (3) SHAP for Explainability, (4) Framework Design, and (5) Evaluation Metrics. Figure 1 shows the overall methodology. Informed consent was obtained from all participants involved in the study, and, where applicable, consent was obtained from legal guardians for minor participants as approved by the IRB. And then Figure 1 is shown with lots of AI errors on the image. An absolutely totally fine this can be published in a science journal image that purports to show how the study was carried out but instead is just AI slop.
November 27, 2025 at 6:46 AM
Reposted by Birgit Schmidt
jjoque.bsky.social
This sucks; what are we even doing?
Uofm sub Reddit post about a professor using AI to grade a paper "I spent upwards of 40 hours writing a paper for a course, and my professor gave me pages and pages of AI-generated feedback, complete with section headings, bold text, and language addressing her as the grader (she tried to edit some of this out). I have strong ethical oppositions to AI, and I do everything I can to avoid giving it my art or writing. It’s incredibly frustrating to find out that I just put 40 hours of stress and original effort into training ChatGPT on my writing style. Not to mention that I was marked down for things that a human grader never would have even noticed. I really want to bring this up with her in office hours, but I’m worried that I’m going to be penalized for it on future assignments. The AI gave me a good grade, so it’s probably safer for my GPA if I ignore it, but I’m just so angry. How can professors ask us not to use AI to write our papers if they just use AI to grade them? I understand that they don’t have a lot of time, but I’m not asking for detailed feedback. I just want my work to be graded by a human."
November 25, 2025 at 4:58 PM
Reposted by Birgit Schmidt
grahamkendall.bsky.social
The inner workings of a paper mill: deevybee.blogspot.com/2025/11/the-...
The inner workings of a paper mill:
My Norxin sting operation Guest post by Csaba Szabo Chair of Pharmacology, University of Fribourg, Switzerland   After the limited success ...
buff.ly
November 13, 2025 at 8:12 AM
Reposted by Birgit Schmidt
maxplanck.de
According to an international survey conducted by Elsevier, 68 percent of scientists say that publication pressure has increased over the past two to three years. 3,200 researchers from 113 countries took part in the survey. www.elsevier.com/insights/con... @elsevierconnect.bsky.social
Researcher of the Future: Confidence in Research
In this report, learn how researchers are adapting to rapid AI change, shifting funding landscapes, and new expectations for collaboration and impact.
www.elsevier.com
November 10, 2025 at 7:39 AM
Reposted by Birgit Schmidt
oapenbooks.bsky.social
Still time to sign up for this webinar tomorrow hosted by @copim.bsky.social, @sparc-eu.bsky.social & @scossfunding.bsky.social

The 75-minute workshop will feature presentations from SCOSS, @thoth-metadata.bsky.social & our very own Graham Stone.

Find our more and register below 👇 #OAbooks
November 10, 2025 at 6:59 AM
Reposted by Birgit Schmidt
samuelmoore.org
Newly released Stockholm Declaration recommends the following reforms to publishing:

1. Academia resumes control of publishing

2. Incentive systems to merit quality, not quantity

3. Independent fraud detection and prevention

4. Legislation and policies to protect science quality and integrity
Reformation of science publishing: the Stockholm Declaration | Royal Society Open Science
Science relies on integrity and trustworthiness. But scientists under career pressure are lured to purchase fake publications from ‘paper mills’ that use AI-generated data, text and image fabrication....
royalsocietypublishing.org
November 5, 2025 at 7:07 PM
Reposted by Birgit Schmidt
softwaresaved.bsky.social
📄 A reminder that we are seeking writers (£600) and reviewers (£210) to support the development of new guides on:
- AI in research software
- Green Computing
- EDI in research software

Application deadline: Friday 3 October 2025

Find out more at www.software.ac.uk/news/writers...
September 24, 2025 at 8:10 AM
Reposted by Birgit Schmidt
stephenturner.us
Cory Doctorow (not on Bluesky) published IMHO one of the most compelling pieces about AI being a bubble pluralistic.net/2025/09/27/e...
Pluralistic: The real (economic) AI apocalypse is nigh (27 Sep 2025) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow
pluralistic.net
September 30, 2025 at 2:10 PM
Reposted by Birgit Schmidt
noamross.net
Between @python.org and @carpentries.carpentries.org, the open-source ecosystem is rejecting the administration's inquisition against DEI. If you can support them with a donation please do. I just did!

Does anyone know about others who have declined NIH or NSF grant funding over over these terms?
python.org Python Software Foundation @python.org · Oct 27
TLDR; The PSF has made the decision to put our community and our shared diversity, equity, and inclusion values ahead of seeking $1.5M in new revenue. Please read and share. pyfound.blogspot.com/2025/10/NSF-...
🧵
The official home of the Python Programming Language
www.python.org
October 27, 2025 at 5:47 PM
Reposted by Birgit Schmidt
alastairdunning.bsky.social
"Crucially, students will need to develop sufficient expertise to identify when AI systems produce plausible but incorrect outputs — which poses a dilemma because this requires the very skills that AI is starting to replace."

www.nature.com/articles/d41...
PhD training needs a reboot in an AI world
As machines get better at data analysis and writing tasks, doctoral training must evolve to make the most of artificial-intelligence outputs.
www.nature.com
November 6, 2025 at 9:22 AM
Reposted by Birgit Schmidt
hughshanahan.bsky.social
Lynda points out that even though a relatively small number of data sources have been shut down by the US Federal government, many more are affected through letting go of staff - death by a thousand cuts.
November 6, 2025 at 9:23 AM
Reposted by Birgit Schmidt
carnage4life.bsky.social
arXiv will no longer accept review articles and position papers unless they have been accepted at a journal or a conference and complete successful peer review.

This is due to being overwhelmed by a hundreds of AI generated papers a month.

Yet another open submission process killed by LLMs.
Attention Authors: Updated Practice for Review Articles and Position Papers in arXiv CS Category – arXiv blog
blog.arxiv.org
November 1, 2025 at 5:28 PM
Reposted by Birgit Schmidt
philipncohen.com
It's easy for some of you to just never use LLMs and just criticize people who do. I would like to be in that situation. But here I am, with my moderator volunteers, assessing hundreds of papers submitted to @socarxiv.bsky.social, trying to decide how to fairly judge whether to accept them. /1
November 2, 2025 at 2:36 PM
Reposted by Birgit Schmidt
dannykay68.bsky.social
DEPRESSING: This is a list of Federal Funding Cuts and Research Universities. The tracker documents the impacts of the cuts on the human infrastructure of the research enterprise airtable.com/appo02JOpIo2...
Airtable | Everyone's app platform
Airtable is a low-code platform for building collaborative apps. Customize your workflow, collaborate, and achieve ambitious outcomes. Get started for free.
airtable.com
October 27, 2025 at 6:46 AM
Reposted by Birgit Schmidt
vinzenzhediger.bsky.social
News from the Evil Empire of Academic Publishing: In June Taylor & Francis acquired the back catalogue of Amsterdam University Press' film and media series. As a consequence the majority of the series editors publicly resigned and decided to move their series to /

necsus-ejms.org/sale-of-the-...
Sale of the Amsterdam University Press film, media and communication list to Taylor & Francis - NECSUS
July 9, 2025
necsus-ejms.org
October 2, 2025 at 12:18 PM
Reposted by Birgit Schmidt
openlibhums.org
Join us for #OAWeek!

Webinar: Mainstreaming Diamond – Regional Perspectives, Shared Futures

With @joedeville.bsky.social, @theblochian.bsky.social, @kirahopkins.bsky.social, @rupertgatti.bsky.social, @joannaball.bsky.social & @paulaclemente.bsky.social

🗓️ 24/10 - 1:00 pm BST

🔗 shorturl.at/eFIvX
Webinar poster for “Mainstreaming Diamond: Regional Perspectives, Shared Futures,” dated 24 October 2025.
October 9, 2025 at 2:53 PM
Reposted by Birgit Schmidt
estherschindler.bsky.social
I just saw someone use the abbreviation “AI;DR” and I’ll be laughing for a while.
October 6, 2025 at 10:00 PM
Reposted by Birgit Schmidt
davidprosser.bsky.social
The @doaj.bsky.social is consulting on whether to retire their Added/Withdrawn change logs. There is a short survey and feedback is very welcome:

blog.doaj.org/2025/07/14/l...
Let us know! Is it time to retire the Added/Withdrawn change log? – DOAJ Blog
blog.doaj.org
August 29, 2025 at 10:36 AM
Reposted by Birgit Schmidt
faineg.bsky.social
There’s an enormous amount of stuff in this book I’d like to highlight, but start with:

“What emerges as the most elementary insight is that, since we do not now have any ways of making computers wise, we ought not now to give computers tasks that demand wisdom.”
What could be more obvious than the fact that, whatever intelligence a computer can muster, however it may be acquired, it must always and necessarily be absolutely alien to any and all authentic human concerns? The very asking of the question, "What does a judge (or a psychiatrist) know that we cannot tell a computer?" is a monstrous obscenity. That it has to be put into print at all, even for the purpose of exposing its morbidity, is a sign of the madness of our times. Computers can make judicial decisions, computers can make psychiatric judgments. They can flip coins in much more sophisticated ways than can the most patient human being. The point is that they ought not be given such tasks. They may even be able to arrive at "correct" decisions in some cases-but always and necessarily on bases no human being should be willing to accept. There have been many debates on "Computers and Mind." What I conclude here is that the relevant issues are neither technological nor even mathematical; they are ethical. They cannot be settled by asking questions beginning with "can." The limits of the applicability of computers are ultimately statable only in terms of oughts. What emerges as the most elementary insight is that, since we do not now have any ways of making computers wise, we ought not now to give computers tasks that demand wisdom.
August 28, 2025 at 10:34 PM
Reposted by Birgit Schmidt
courtneymilan.com
Hi authors! Please remember to file a claim!
arstechnica.com Ars Technica @arstechnica.com · Aug 27
AI advocates have warned that if every author in the class action filed a claim, it would "financially ruin" the entire industry.
Authors celebrate “historic” settlement coming soon in Anthropic class action
Advocates fear such settlements will “financially ruin” the AI industry.
arstechnica.com
August 27, 2025 at 5:30 PM