Faine Greenwood
@faineg.bsky.social
92K followers 20K following 110K posts
civilian drone mapping technology and GIS/spatial data consultant, sometimes journalist and writer, monitors small drones in the Ukraine war, humanitarian-aid adjacent, always annoying online. they/them pronouns. minors DNI
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
faineg.bsky.social
I have drawn a visual summary of what goes on in my brain when I’m Posting:
fig 1: shock at the Internet fig 2: a displacement behavior fig 3: gotta purge the demons fig 4: successful purgation of demons
Reposted by Faine Greenwood
Reposted by Faine Greenwood
campbelljd.bsky.social
This post sounds like a gateway to post dumb sports things that only a human can do. Dumb is up for interpenetration & in the eye of the beholder
faineg.bsky.social
It is notable that while a lot of important people are running around right now braying about how AI can replace the work of creative people, pretty much no one is saying the same things about using AI to replace pro athletes - even though it would be very technically feasible, and save money.
faineg.bsky.social
I do think porn seems to occupy a very specific and different head space for most people, in the sense of “this exists for the specific purpose of getting me off in a physical act”
Reposted by Faine Greenwood
eaglebeaverman.bsky.social
The human experience craves intention. The reason we still have humans play football instead of robots despite the CTE is that the human drama of the narrative of each team, wondering who will win, the playoff implications is largely what we’re there for, not the actual product itself.
faineg.bsky.social
you’d think the “AI can replace all artists and writers” people would have noticed that no one gives a shit about watching computers compete with one another, and yet
giziti.bsky.social
or chess: people play chess, they watch other people play chess, it's even getting a little popular to do. computers are infinitely better than humans at chess. nobody watches computer chess.
Reposted by Faine Greenwood
mattlaschneider.bsky.social
RIP grant imahara you would’ve loved hunting AI robots
faineg.bsky.social
No problem if you just have the computers play Madden against each other - who needs the NFL!
Reposted by Faine Greenwood
essaywells.bsky.social
I saw the term "single use plastics of the mind" on here a few days ago, which captures the AI problem neatly.
Reposted by Faine Greenwood
tigerlily.northsky.social
But what if the AIs are trans?! They'd have an unfair advantage at sports! And we would never know because we couldn't test their chromosomes!
faineg.bsky.social
It is notable that while a lot of important people are running around right now braying about how AI can replace the work of creative people, pretty much no one is saying the same things about using AI to replace pro athletes - even though it would be very technically feasible, and save money.
faineg.bsky.social
Obviously for the sake of Taylor Swift we could also give the robot a huge schlong
faineg.bsky.social
this is the tireless, far cheaper Travis Kelce replacement that AI could bring you, and Sam Altman is doing a disservice to investors by denying this to the world
Reposted by Faine Greenwood
faineg.bsky.social
could it be that humans tend to prefer watching other humans do stuff even when there are perfectly reasonable artificial replacements

One could also wonder why animation has always been niche in comparison to live action films with human actors (and I love animation!)
Reposted by Faine Greenwood
faineg.bsky.social
It is notable that while a lot of important people are running around right now braying about how AI can replace the work of creative people, pretty much no one is saying the same things about using AI to replace pro athletes - even though it would be very technically feasible, and save money.
faineg.bsky.social
we are leaving MONEY on the TABLE for INVESTORS by not replacing the entire NFL with flame-thrower robots
mxnectarine.bsky.social
replace all sports with Robot Wars
faineg.bsky.social
could it be that humans tend to prefer watching other humans do stuff even when there are perfectly reasonable artificial replacements

One could also wonder why animation has always been niche in comparison to live action films with human actors (and I love animation!)
faineg.bsky.social
It is notable that while a lot of important people are running around right now braying about how AI can replace the work of creative people, pretty much no one is saying the same things about using AI to replace pro athletes - even though it would be very technically feasible, and save money.
faineg.bsky.social
We could have replaced actual football games with AI players on a simulated field a LONG time ago - we could have pulled this off by simply televising people playing Madden even before that.

Imagine the money executives would save!

How mysterious that this never took off.
mrchompchomp.bsky.social
Analogy: Imagine a robot could play really good golf. Would you watch? Maybe as a curiosity. Would you want it competing against humans? Ofc not. Now imagine the robot played good golf sometimes but sometimes threw all its clubs off a cliff. That’s gen AI doing art. Misses the point & also sucks.
faineg.bsky.social
there is a certain congruence between claiming that AI can replace artists and writers and being the kind of person who thinks shooting a caged lion is honorable and fun
packbawky.bsky.social
Yeah, it's like, seriously... Fun. Have you heard of it? Have you never done something for hours, just for fun? Wouldn't you feel cheated out of your fun if...I don't know, you pressed the wrong button and your Pokédex filled in, or a drone swooped in and shot your buck for you?
Reposted by Faine Greenwood
packbawky.bsky.social
Yeah, it's like, seriously... Fun. Have you heard of it? Have you never done something for hours, just for fun? Wouldn't you feel cheated out of your fun if...I don't know, you pressed the wrong button and your Pokédex filled in, or a drone swooped in and shot your buck for you?
Reposted by Faine Greenwood
mxnectarine.bsky.social
I don’t understand why people who hate thinking and writing feel like they need to produce things that require those things
faineg.bsky.social
gotta do em or your heart explodes
Reposted by Faine Greenwood
johnfields091.bsky.social
This, this, this. Whatever I'm plan to write only takes shape when I start to write it. What I write is mostly an irrelevant blog, and yet it's something that I would never outsource. I don't want to have written my blog, irrelevant though it may be; I want to write it. That's the fun part.
faineg.bsky.social
I think the killer argument against relying upon AI to write is the massive amount of thinking and concept-welding that goes on for me (and I assume most everyone else) during the *process* of writing something - it’s a cognitive process and I know I’d actively get stupider if I skipped it
buckrawheat.bsky.social
I also just wonder if any of these people have ever really appreciated the value added in going through the experience of something like this. The fact that it changes you to engage with and puzzle over your own work, that you're not a content printer that just needs juicing to go faster.
Reposted by Faine Greenwood
eruditorumpress.com
I've just spent fifteen minutes on a 150 word section describing the crime scene photo of Mary Kelly's dismembered body. It was legitimately some of the least pleasant writing work I have ever done. At exactly zero points in the process did I think, "gosh, I wish I could get AI to do this for me."
faineg.bsky.social
there’s this weird idea a lot of people seem to have about how all of us writers and artists must secretly want to use AI and are merely resisting temptation for ethical reasons, and like, no, it’s not hard for me to resist drinking the bowl of Piss With Glass In It actually
faineg.bsky.social
Was there a moment in the 90s when executives saw those Clip Art Packs on CD-ROM and announced that graphic design was now dead forever?

Because genAI art does really remind me of generic 90s clip-art a lot of the time
thewanderingjew.bsky.social
I think what AI seems to do 'best' in terms of visual art is generating images that are ultimately disposable. Created in seconds to be viewed once and then forgotten forever.