Reposted by Cactrot
anyway if you work at the syndicate get in touch
January 13, 2026 at 4:02 PM
anyway if you work at the syndicate get in touch
Reposted by Cactrot
Is it possible to sanction whomever wrote this for being such an obvious piece of shit?
January 13, 2026 at 4:33 AM
Is it possible to sanction whomever wrote this for being such an obvious piece of shit?
Reposted by Cactrot
DOJ’s response is:
• two objections to the order (that were previously argued and rejected)
• DOJ writes a paragraph (below) that does violence to the English language and common sense to describe what’s changed with Venezuela and Maduro this month
• DOJ rejects both remote *and* in-person hearings
• two objections to the order (that were previously argued and rejected)
• DOJ writes a paragraph (below) that does violence to the English language and common sense to describe what’s changed with Venezuela and Maduro this month
• DOJ rejects both remote *and* in-person hearings
January 13, 2026 at 4:30 AM
DOJ’s response is:
• two objections to the order (that were previously argued and rejected)
• DOJ writes a paragraph (below) that does violence to the English language and common sense to describe what’s changed with Venezuela and Maduro this month
• DOJ rejects both remote *and* in-person hearings
• two objections to the order (that were previously argued and rejected)
• DOJ writes a paragraph (below) that does violence to the English language and common sense to describe what’s changed with Venezuela and Maduro this month
• DOJ rejects both remote *and* in-person hearings