I was kidding! Maybe the wrong moment to do so, but all apologies. Love yr work.

I have not read your skeets and have no idea about your consistent, long-term position on these events, but still want to attack your credibility because reasons. What's the best way to do that, more or less?

[Srsly, take some deep breaths -"It's Chinatown, Jake."]

Isn't that what comment threads are for?

Aye, coming with that reform fist, wait 'til next election game isn't gonna move the needle.

Yes, and if Democrats had outlawed their own insider trading they could go a lot Pelosi harder on this.

Bad kabuki at best.

Dem leadership: changing this is a difficult process, you fool. You rube. You utter infant. Give us between $5 and $50

Mamdani, wiping grease off his hands: So it turns out there's a switch on this machine that puts it into either orphan-shredding mode or free school lunch mode. Just had to flip it

Randos: "Let's not with the generational warfare."

Gen X: "You're a little late. This is just the rebound."

To a Gen Xer, the blindness surrounding this shift is incredibly stark, just unbelievable.

But that's the power of massive Cold War subsidies posing as the free market.

Someone coined the term 'Boomer ballast' (for change foreclosed before it takes root) and when that fades, yippy skippy.

Aye, and related: looking at/accusing Gen X like they're a defining factor in *anything* will play into that political sonic boom.

When various demographics start realizing the immense power available by uniting in the absence of Boomers, well, wish I would be here for it.

They didn't cancel but The Guardian got jealous, began twelve-minute comment windows bc their obedient scribblers couldn't keep up with the comments.

We need to rething smoke and CÖ2 alarms because

I liked using india ink with watercolor. Some texture for the splashes of color.