Daniel Hanley
@danielahanley.bsky.social
1.4K followers 610 following 790 posts
Senior Legal Analyst at the Open Markets Institute. Newsletter: https://danielhanley.substack.com
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
danielahanley.bsky.social
Hi new followers, I am a senior legal analyst at the Open Markets Institute, where I write about antitrust law and how to make our economy fairer. I occasionally write in my newsletter Law and Power on Substack. Elated to build a new community here on Bluesky. danielhanley.substack.com
Law and Power | Daniel Hanley | Substack
Explaining antitrust law, antimonopoly, the consequences of concentrated corporate power, and how the law distributes power in our society. Click to read Law and Power, by Daniel Hanley, a Substack pu...
danielhanley.substack.com
Reposted by Daniel Hanley
sanjukta.bsky.social
This actually is important. The (modified) per se rule on tying does constrain Big Tech behavior to some non-trivial degree. No accident Microsoft filed an amicus brief for defendants (whose petition failed)
danielahanley.bsky.social
Finally, a decent decision from the Supreme Court. Today, the Court denied a petition to get rid of the per se rule on tying. This is incredibly important (E.g., Google ad tech district court decision!). www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?...
Search
www.supremecourt.gov
Reposted by Daniel Hanley
econliberties.bsky.social
CA just banned price fixing via algorithm across the economy!

As corporations weaponize this technology to rip off consumers and hurt competition it's great to see @governor.ca.gov sign AB 325 to stop this practice!

Here's our own Lee Hepner testifying in support of the bill earlier this year👇
Reposted by Daniel Hanley
ddayen.bsky.social
Harold Meyerson sat in on a court case in LA which made clear that Amazon controls every aspect of the work experience of delivery driver "contractors" while claiming they are not a joint employer. It would be devastating in a world with actually functioning labor law.
Breaking: Amazon Actually Employs Its Delivery Drivers
While Trump, Elon Musk, and Jeff Bezos seek to nullify worker rights, a Los Angeles court last week forced Bezos’s company to document the truth.
prospect.org
danielahanley.bsky.social
Finally, a decent decision from the Supreme Court. Today, the Court denied a petition to get rid of the per se rule on tying. This is incredibly important (E.g., Google ad tech district court decision!). www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?...
Search
www.supremecourt.gov
Reposted by Daniel Hanley
sanjukta.bsky.social
3. Finally, we should reconsider the self coordinating market as a starting point because economic coordination is not a small exception or add-on to the basic picture: it is fundamental to economic life, in any form. It should get equal billing as a basic building block of any theory of the economy
Reposted by Daniel Hanley
superwuster.bsky.social
It is weird and not healthy to begin every day wondering:

"What outrageous thing will the U.S. government do today? Will it be unethical, unconstitutional, or all of the above?"
danielahanley.bsky.social
There’s something truly terrifying about how casually tech oligarchs now describe their plans to restructure society. They are publicly pitching to investors and governments a future where we are all obedient subjects under their control.
Reposted by Daniel Hanley
Reposted by Daniel Hanley
markharris.bsky.social
An important thing that is often ignored about Mamdani: he's cheerful! Taking the city's (and country's) problems seriously doesn't have to mean projecting nothing but darkness and rage. His positive vibe is an unbelievably effective way to make the tent bigger. As is fun/dorky stuff like this.
zohrankmamdani.bsky.social
New York City, I can see a future with you. And it’s one we can afford.

Our new ad just aired during The Golden Bachelor.
danielahanley.bsky.social
Can’t wait to read. Congratulations.
Reposted by Daniel Hanley
erikpeinert.bsky.social
My book is out today! Read my stuff! academic.oup.com/book/60584?l...

The book looks at the long-run evolution of policy around monopoly and competition in the US and France over the 20th century, using extensive archival research to track the main policy actors who changed it at key moments.
Monopoly Politics: Competition and Learning in the Evolution of Policy Regimes
Abstract. Motivated by the contemporary extremes of monopoly power in the United States and globally, this book uses an in-depth comparison of the United S
academic.oup.com
Reposted by Daniel Hanley
capitolforum.bsky.social
AELP’s Katie Van Dyck says competitors don't need to directly communicate to collude.
“It doesn’t have to be the old all defendants get in a smoke-filled room... They’re using the same tool collectively to set prices and it is upending traditional ideas of supply and demand.”

#TCF2025TechConference
Reposted by Daniel Hanley
capitolforum.bsky.social
The Capitol Forum's 2025 Tech Conference has begun!

Elizabeth Odette, the antitrust chief for the Office of the Minnesota Attorney General, delivered her keynote remarks:
"The way we look at tech has evolved and continues to evolve," she said. "State Attorneys General are ready. Are you?"
Reposted by Daniel Hanley
karlbode.com
Fortune writes an entire story about Sinclair's effort to ban Kimmel "to protect communities" without making a SINGLE reference to Sinclair's long history of airing election fraud conspiracy theories and medical disinformation
Sinclair reveals that it asked ABC to create a CBS-like ombudsman while backing down on Jimmy Kimmel suspension
Sinclair said that removing Kimmel was free speech itself and it’s “inconsistent to champion free speech while demanding that broadcasters air specific content.”
www.yahoo.com
Reposted by Daniel Hanley
michellenie.bsky.social
Great article by @megafreda.bsky.social! Thanks for the shoutout for my cloud work w/ @openmarkets.bsky.social (w/ @maxvonthun.bsky.social and @danielahanley.bsky.social)
techpolicypress.bsky.social
The European Commission is weighing whether the Digital Markets Act adequately covers integrated AI or if explicit inclusion is needed. Tech Policy Press fellow
@megafreda.bsky.social explores the growing push to bring these systems firmly under its scope.
Will the EU Designate AI Under the Digital Markets Act? | TechPolicy.Press
Megan Kirkwood unpacks the growing momentum to bring integrated AI applications under the scope of Europe's Digital Markets Act.
www.techpolicy.press
Reposted by Daniel Hanley
joejerome.com
If “caution” means allowing a defendant’s illegal behavior to persist, it defeats the purpose of finding liability in the first place and undermines the law enforcement function of antitrust law.

www.promarket.org/2025/09/23/a...
Appraising the Google Search Antitrust Remedies - ProMarket
Erik Hovenkamp and A. Douglas Melamed discuss what Judge Amit Mehta got right and wrong in his remedy decision in the Google Search antitrust case.
www.promarket.org
Reposted by Daniel Hanley
cjsprigman.bsky.social
They really act like the president is a king. But only if that president is a Republican.
Reposted by Daniel Hanley
isabellamweber.bsky.social
Mainstream economics continues to rely on Newtonian mathematics — using calculus to optimise, subject to constraints, an approach not suited to understanding macroeconomics or human behavior.

Nice shoutout to Vela Velupillai, my former professor at The New School

www.ft.com/content/2925...
Reposted by Daniel Hanley
basel.bsky.social
Come work with me, pals! #hiring
Reposted by Daniel Hanley
eleanortyler.bsky.social
Welp, that’s 90 years of precedent down the tubes.
stevevladeck.bsky.social
#BREAKING: Over dissents from Justices Sotomayor, Kagan & Jackson, #SCOTUS grants a stay in the Slaughter case (allowing President Trump to remove the last Dem member of the FTC), *and* grants certiorari "before judgment" to decide whether to formally overrule its 1935 ruling in Humphrey's Executor.
Reposted by Daniel Hanley
espinsegall.bsky.social
The Court is overruling federal laws, its own precedent, and lower court decisions, on the emergency docket which, quite simply, real courts do not do.
danielahanley.bsky.social
Remember, this decision isn’t about POTUS’s authority to remove officials for poor performance or the ability to enact the executive’s agenda.

Instead, this decision is about whether dissent should exist at all in our regulatory system. SCOTUS effectively says it shouldn’t.
stevevladeck.bsky.social
#BREAKING: Over dissents from Justices Sotomayor, Kagan & Jackson, #SCOTUS grants a stay in the Slaughter case (allowing President Trump to remove the last Dem member of the FTC), *and* grants certiorari "before judgment" to decide whether to formally overrule its 1935 ruling in Humphrey's Executor.