DanJLaf
@danjlaf.bsky.social
Philatelist & 50 yrs APS,Bookaholic,Mod GOP, Genealogy Buff, Fly the Flag! Descendant of Four Rev War Ancestors, Christian, Let's Go Mets!
Met Fan since 1962
Met Fan since 1962
I have a Home library, somewhat smaller in a Smaller Place then before still hundreds of personal Books'
Print
In addition to sigh E-books... its just some books are only out as E-books these days sadly
In addition to sigh E-books... its just some books are only out as E-books these days sadly
Back to the era when having a home library was fashionable #BMovieManiacs
Books Reading GIF
ALT: Books Reading GIF
media.tenor.com
August 16, 2025 at 4:20 AM
I have a Home library, somewhat smaller in a Smaller Place then before still hundreds of personal Books'
Print
In addition to sigh E-books... its just some books are only out as E-books these days sadly
In addition to sigh E-books... its just some books are only out as E-books these days sadly
The suit was because there was an OPT-OUT but:" Less than a year after the Board introduced the books, however, it rescinded the parental opt out policy. "
Parents sued over that, the scotus ruled that parents HAVE A RIGHT to OPT out their kids, restoring the opt out they had
that was rescinded!
Parents sued over that, the scotus ruled that parents HAVE A RIGHT to OPT out their kids, restoring the opt out they had
that was rescinded!
Justice Sotomayor: In sum, never, in the context of public schools or elsewhere, has this Court held that mere exposure to concepts inconsistent with one’s religious beliefs could give rise to a First Amendment claim.5 www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24p...
www.supremecourt.gov
June 28, 2025 at 3:11 PM
The suit was because there was an OPT-OUT but:" Less than a year after the Board introduced the books, however, it rescinded the parental opt out policy. "
Parents sued over that, the scotus ruled that parents HAVE A RIGHT to OPT out their kids, restoring the opt out they had
that was rescinded!
Parents sued over that, the scotus ruled that parents HAVE A RIGHT to OPT out their kids, restoring the opt out they had
that was rescinded!
A Schools supposed teach whats Needed ,the 3 R's and on the NECESSARY not all this wasted hours of pushing Social mores onto children that can violate way Parents bring up their kids, its been indoctrination of helpless MINORS vs Parents wishs now less wasted time better spent on REAL NEEDS
I don't understand how you can believe that someone teaching your children things against your religion undermines your religion, but I guess they would say my not understanding that is their point.
June 28, 2025 at 2:29 PM
A Schools supposed teach whats Needed ,the 3 R's and on the NECESSARY not all this wasted hours of pushing Social mores onto children that can violate way Parents bring up their kids, its been indoctrination of helpless MINORS vs Parents wishs now less wasted time better spent on REAL NEEDS
Yes, In regard to something that does go vs certain religious views (Sodom and Gorromah) Parents have a RIGHT to ensure a schools not FORCING on a View going against Parents upbringing of their children. Schools need keep to the 3 R's and Teach necessary things NOT PUSH SOCIAL MORES!
So you just say you have a religious belief, and the kids don’t have to hear that teaching. Man.
June 28, 2025 at 2:25 PM
Yes, In regard to something that does go vs certain religious views (Sodom and Gorromah) Parents have a RIGHT to ensure a schools not FORCING on a View going against Parents upbringing of their children. Schools need keep to the 3 R's and Teach necessary things NOT PUSH SOCIAL MORES!
since 1943 Its been held that no student has to recite the pledge under 1A, some states require MINOR CHILDREN have parental consent to NOT do pledge, so there's been an OPT OUT by Parents this is SAME that violates parents religious teachings, requiring parents be able OPT OUT like pledge
school day still starts with pledge of allegiance so let’s start there …
June 28, 2025 at 2:18 PM
since 1943 Its been held that no student has to recite the pledge under 1A, some states require MINOR CHILDREN have parental consent to NOT do pledge, so there's been an OPT OUT by Parents this is SAME that violates parents religious teachings, requiring parents be able OPT OUT like pledge
What Country is that/ Can't Be USA as its a Constitutional REPUBLIC never been nor is it a Demoncracy
The amount of shit I've gotten for this post today has been astounding.
June 28, 2025 at 1:57 PM
What Country is that/ Can't Be USA as its a Constitutional REPUBLIC never been nor is it a Demoncracy
Scary more been 4 far left liberal justices
June 28, 2025 at 1:55 PM
Scary more been 4 far left liberal justices
More terrifying been 4 far leftist Justices who would have Legislated from the Bench disregarding constitution
But her emails?
almost ten years ago.
what a different world this would be if people had listened instead of mocking her.
what a different world this would be if people had listened instead of mocking her.
June 28, 2025 at 1:54 PM
More terrifying been 4 far leftist Justices who would have Legislated from the Bench disregarding constitution
Hopefully he had an heart Attack or Stroke on seeing USA crater their Nuclear hopes... Or Mossad got to him
If Iran’s nuclear program wasn’t seriously damaged, then Trump is giving Iran a perfect cloak by saying it was.
A smart Iran would allow the USA to believe that while they finished their work in complete secrecy.
If so, then when it’s revealed, it could send shockwaves throughout Israel.
A smart Iran would allow the USA to believe that while they finished their work in complete secrecy.
If so, then when it’s revealed, it could send shockwaves throughout Israel.
June 26, 2025 at 7:34 AM
Hopefully he had an heart Attack or Stroke on seeing USA crater their Nuclear hopes... Or Mossad got to him
Lets See, Gazans elected Hamas, terrorists. Hamas Their Govt Attacked Israel,act of war, Gaza got more war then expected,
And West Bank was JORDANS, Jordan Invaded Israel, Lost and Lost West Bank war spoils, Syria invaded Syria lost Golan
In every instance Israel reacted to Threats/ Attks Vs Israel
And West Bank was JORDANS, Jordan Invaded Israel, Lost and Lost West Bank war spoils, Syria invaded Syria lost Golan
In every instance Israel reacted to Threats/ Attks Vs Israel
June 26, 2025 at 7:23 AM
Lets See, Gazans elected Hamas, terrorists. Hamas Their Govt Attacked Israel,act of war, Gaza got more war then expected,
And West Bank was JORDANS, Jordan Invaded Israel, Lost and Lost West Bank war spoils, Syria invaded Syria lost Golan
In every instance Israel reacted to Threats/ Attks Vs Israel
And West Bank was JORDANS, Jordan Invaded Israel, Lost and Lost West Bank war spoils, Syria invaded Syria lost Golan
In every instance Israel reacted to Threats/ Attks Vs Israel
Well Iran did sutdown its internet access for its people during the war
I assume this sort of coordination to deescalate isn’t totally rare, but if the goal is for Iran to save face with their people, doesn’t Trump blabbing about it defeat the purpose?
June 26, 2025 at 7:12 AM
Well Iran did sutdown its internet access for its people during the war
ANY nation that Supplies Iran with Nukes be it Russia or China or Pakistan if IRAN uses said Nukes THOSE Supplying Nations could well be the ones Retaliated on
So Any such Foolish Including North Korea should expect
Iran use = THEY were ones that Used
So Any such Foolish Including North Korea should expect
Iran use = THEY were ones that Used
Dmitry Medvedev, commenting on the U.S. strikes on Iran, claims that some countries are now ready to directly supply Iran with their nuclear arsenal. And that, overall, Iran hasn’t suffered but has only grown stronger. In short, the usual rhetoric from Russian propaganda.
June 22, 2025 at 9:30 AM
ANY nation that Supplies Iran with Nukes be it Russia or China or Pakistan if IRAN uses said Nukes THOSE Supplying Nations could well be the ones Retaliated on
So Any such Foolish Including North Korea should expect
Iran use = THEY were ones that Used
So Any such Foolish Including North Korea should expect
Iran use = THEY were ones that Used
Oh and in 1973 I was 18 , HS Senior, AP US History
When it was passed.. I LIVED its Passage ,youngster
When it was passed.. I LIVED its Passage ,youngster
June 22, 2025 at 9:05 AM
Oh and in 1973 I was 18 , HS Senior, AP US History
When it was passed.. I LIVED its Passage ,youngster
When it was passed.. I LIVED its Passage ,youngster
Read "reporting"
www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/...
www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/...
June 22, 2025 at 9:03 AM
Read "reporting"
www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/...
www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/...
LMAO Its a LAW passed, The Law itself auths presidents
there's no Invoking by CONGRESS *rolling eyes*
there's no Invoking by CONGRESS *rolling eyes*
June 22, 2025 at 9:00 AM
LMAO Its a LAW passed, The Law itself auths presidents
there's no Invoking by CONGRESS *rolling eyes*
there's no Invoking by CONGRESS *rolling eyes*
WAR POWERS ACT:
The resolution required that, in the absence of a declaration of war, the president must report to Congress within 48 hours of introducing armed forces into hostilities and must terminate the use of U.S. armed forces within 60 days unless Congress permits otherwise.
The resolution required that, in the absence of a declaration of war, the president must report to Congress within 48 hours of introducing armed forces into hostilities and must terminate the use of U.S. armed forces within 60 days unless Congress permits otherwise.
June 22, 2025 at 8:22 AM
WAR POWERS ACT:
The resolution required that, in the absence of a declaration of war, the president must report to Congress within 48 hours of introducing armed forces into hostilities and must terminate the use of U.S. armed forces within 60 days unless Congress permits otherwise.
The resolution required that, in the absence of a declaration of war, the president must report to Congress within 48 hours of introducing armed forces into hostilities and must terminate the use of U.S. armed forces within 60 days unless Congress permits otherwise.
DECLARING war is not same thing as the Congress Auth they GAVE under War Powers for ANY PRESIDENT and OBAMA...CLINTON..BIDEN did also in any use of USA military to Safeguard USA. War Powers ACT allows Limited action, Yes only Congress can DECLARE war. But Korea, Vietnam etc never were DECLARED
June 22, 2025 at 8:20 AM
DECLARING war is not same thing as the Congress Auth they GAVE under War Powers for ANY PRESIDENT and OBAMA...CLINTON..BIDEN did also in any use of USA military to Safeguard USA. War Powers ACT allows Limited action, Yes only Congress can DECLARE war. But Korea, Vietnam etc never were DECLARED
Cant do Retroactive Its unconstitutional and Trump acted within War Powers while Congress waffled on anything
" the president must report to Congress within 48 hours of hostilities and must terminate the use of U.S. armed forces within 60 days unless Congress permits otherwise."
" the president must report to Congress within 48 hours of hostilities and must terminate the use of U.S. armed forces within 60 days unless Congress permits otherwise."
June 22, 2025 at 8:16 AM
Cant do Retroactive Its unconstitutional and Trump acted within War Powers while Congress waffled on anything
" the president must report to Congress within 48 hours of hostilities and must terminate the use of U.S. armed forces within 60 days unless Congress permits otherwise."
" the president must report to Congress within 48 hours of hostilities and must terminate the use of U.S. armed forces within 60 days unless Congress permits otherwise."
Bombing a Nations Nuclear facilities to prevent it getting nukes, A Nation that did Act of war vs USA in 1979 invading US Soil- Embassy and for decades "death to USA" Was Proper
as Iran's supplied and supported terrorism vs USA and has been a threat to USA Security
as Iran's supplied and supported terrorism vs USA and has been a threat to USA Security
For reference, there is no evidence that Iran's nuclear programme presents a threat to international security. Bombing a country of 90 million people for political clout is a threat to international security.
NEW: Keir Starmer reacts supportively to the US strikes on Iran.
“Iran’s nuclear programme is a grave threat to international security. Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon and the US has taken action to alleviate that threat.”
“Iran’s nuclear programme is a grave threat to international security. Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon and the US has taken action to alleviate that threat.”
June 22, 2025 at 8:13 AM
Bombing a Nations Nuclear facilities to prevent it getting nukes, A Nation that did Act of war vs USA in 1979 invading US Soil- Embassy and for decades "death to USA" Was Proper
as Iran's supplied and supported terrorism vs USA and has been a threat to USA Security
as Iran's supplied and supported terrorism vs USA and has been a threat to USA Security
Makes it easier , instead of being careful to only Hit Houthis, USA can hit everything in Yemen. If Yemanis fire on US Forces.
❗️🇺🇸🇾🇪 Yemen has officially declared its intent to enter the war. The country's military says it is ready to target US ships in its territorial waters. This follows earlier warnings from the Houthis in case of American strikes on Iran.
June 22, 2025 at 8:03 AM
Makes it easier , instead of being careful to only Hit Houthis, USA can hit everything in Yemen. If Yemanis fire on US Forces.
Nope Not Illegally
Politifact:
the president must report to Congress within 48 hours of hostilities and must terminate the use of U.S. armed forces within 60 days
Even under the act, its understood to be some flexibility. "A single raid or even a series of raids would not require authorization
Politifact:
the president must report to Congress within 48 hours of hostilities and must terminate the use of U.S. armed forces within 60 days
Even under the act, its understood to be some flexibility. "A single raid or even a series of raids would not require authorization
Overnight, Trump bombed Iran (illegally) after claiming they're rushing to build nuclear weapons.
The path to building nuclear weapons was cleared by... Trump.
The path to building nuclear weapons was cleared by... Trump.
June 22, 2025 at 7:54 AM
Nope Not Illegally
Politifact:
the president must report to Congress within 48 hours of hostilities and must terminate the use of U.S. armed forces within 60 days
Even under the act, its understood to be some flexibility. "A single raid or even a series of raids would not require authorization
Politifact:
the president must report to Congress within 48 hours of hostilities and must terminate the use of U.S. armed forces within 60 days
Even under the act, its understood to be some flexibility. "A single raid or even a series of raids would not require authorization
even if true, destruction of whats needed to further enrich and create a bomb hampers them and given mossad has so infiltrated iran..eventually where be found and the place bombed
🇮🇷☢️🇺🇸 Senior Iranian official to Reuters:
"Most of the highly enriched uranium at Fordow was moved to an undeclared location before the US attack. The number of personnel at Fordow was reduced to a minimum."
"Most of the highly enriched uranium at Fordow was moved to an undeclared location before the US attack. The number of personnel at Fordow was reduced to a minimum."
June 22, 2025 at 7:48 AM
even if true, destruction of whats needed to further enrich and create a bomb hampers them and given mossad has so infiltrated iran..eventually where be found and the place bombed
war powers act allowed it same as allowed obumer to and all others to take action to preserve USA security
June 22, 2025 at 7:46 AM
war powers act allowed it same as allowed obumer to and all others to take action to preserve USA security
actually they have had enrichment going on and made no bones of eliminating israel,yes if they gain nukes next thing is israel nuked and they could even hit USA, a suitcase bomb over border or a freighter into nyc port with a nuke
June 14, 2025 at 1:29 AM
actually they have had enrichment going on and made no bones of eliminating israel,yes if they gain nukes next thing is israel nuked and they could even hit USA, a suitcase bomb over border or a freighter into nyc port with a nuke
Iran will have fewer drones to sell to Russia to attack Ukraine
June 14, 2025 at 1:25 AM