Dan Oehm
banner
danoehm.bsky.social
Dan Oehm
@danoehm.bsky.social
🔔 Statistician 🫶 #Rstats 📈 #Dataviz 🏃‍♂️ Trail runner 🤘 Metalhead ❤️ Dad 🔥 #survivor 🌏 Canberran 🌿 Vego

Survivor Stats db: https://survivorstatsdb.com/
Ramblings: https://gradientdescending.com/
Both Rachel and Gabler had slightly fewer votes with the jury (-2) than Sam and Sue, and Cassidy, respectively. A more complex model picks up Rachel and Gabler but misses a couple of others. I find it interesting how well a simple model does.
November 30, 2025 at 8:02 PM
Yeah it didn't seem like he spent much time gauging the reactions, but maybe he didn't have to! It will be interesting to see if he sowed some doubt into Kristina and Steven.
November 28, 2025 at 3:24 AM
I'm at the point where I can think of the most likely scenario but also know that's not happening this season!
November 28, 2025 at 2:52 AM
Everyone loves an underdog story so maybe they're leading up to a Sage-Savannah clash and Sage comes out on top 🤔. Looking forward to ep11!
November 27, 2025 at 11:33 AM
For those who want to dive further into how I measured this relationship you can read this post.

gradientdescending.com/do-jurors-vo...
Do Jurors Vote for their Alliance at the Final Tribal Council? - Dan Oehm | Gradient Descending
At the end of every season of Survivor the jury needs to make a choice, who gets the $1M, which makes jury management very important.
gradientdescending.com
November 27, 2025 at 11:24 AM
Winning 3 consecutive IICs makes a player's chances even worse:
- 70% chance of surviving the next TC (vs 86%)
- 45% chance of surviving the 2nd (vs 71%)

Blog post coming soon with the gorey stats, model, and code.

6/
November 25, 2025 at 10:37 AM
In summary, given where Savannah is in the game, she has a:
- 75% chance of surviving the next TC (vs 86%)
- 65% chance of surviving the 2nd (vs 71%)
- 44% chance of surviving the 3rd (vs 57%)

Definitely not quite as big as I thought, but definitely lower.

5/
November 25, 2025 at 10:37 AM
The analysis used all 48 seasons. Given the game can differ a lot e.g. when they merge, number of challenges, when they win 2 back-to-back challenges, I've taken all the different probabilities into account to estimate this effect.

4/
November 25, 2025 at 10:37 AM
Answer: Yes!

Intuitively, it makes sense. The effect isn't quite as big as I would have thought, but it is statistically significant.

3/
November 25, 2025 at 10:37 AM
Inspired by the challenge stats @joshkettles.bsky.social shared, I wanted to look into it a bit deeper, but reframing the problem slightly:

Are the chances of surviving subsequent Tribal Councils lower after winning back-to-back individual immunity challenges?

2/

bsky.app/profile/josh...
No one in the New Era has won after winning two immunities by Final 8.

Will Savannah break the curse?

Here’s how many additional votes players survived after second immunity win (w/o additional immunity):

Ricard ➡️ 1 *
Tori ➡️ 0
Frannie ➡️ 0
Bruce ➡️ 0
Charlie ➡️ 4
Kyle 47 ➡️ 1 *
Joe ➡️ 2 *

#survivor
November 25, 2025 at 10:37 AM
Code for those inclined
November 22, 2025 at 4:42 AM
Rizo may need to rely on winning an IIC after playing his idol and I don't like his chances. He hasn't performed particularly well.

In which case, he may as well hold onto it for as long as he can. If he gets voted out with it, well that's not too dissimilar from being voted out at the next tribal.
November 22, 2025 at 4:42 AM
Yeah it looks that way. I think Rizo is going to have to rely on winning a challenge after playing the idol which I can't see happening (if he's not voted out with the idol)
November 21, 2025 at 11:59 PM
True! I was just trying to highlight the non-winning finalists. Should have used a different emoji!
November 21, 2025 at 8:30 AM