Roland Hatzenpichler
@environmicrobio.bsky.social
1.3K followers 95 following 1.4K posts
archaea, methane, single cell physiology, single cell activity, next generation physiology / for evidence-based decision-making / I hold strong opinions / I don’t mince words / posts reflect personal views / www.environmental-microbiology.com
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
environmicrobio.bsky.social
Physiology, the functioning of a cell at a given time and in a given set of physiochemical conditions, is an emergent property that cannot be reliably predicted from genomic data or metabolic reconstructions alone. #testthy(metagenomic)hypotheses
Reposted by Roland Hatzenpichler
pilhoferlab.bsky.social
🧐Checkout our preprint revealing the stepwise firing💥 mechanism of a Contractile Injection System @xujwet.bsky.social[email protected] trapped the complex by structure-guided engineering🧪 in multiple intermediate states and imaged them by multimodal #cryoEM❄️🔬
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
Reposted by Roland Hatzenpichler
nagissa.bsky.social
Interested in life’s co-evolution with planetary environments?
🌎🦠🧪

I'm looking for a postdoc to join my group at #McGill and happy to sponsor applicants for the TSI fellowship.

Please reach out if interested!

academicjobsonline.org/ajo/jobs/30777
McGill University, Trottier Space Institute
Job #AJO30777, Trottier Space Institute Postdoctoral Fellow, Trottier Space Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, CA
academicjobsonline.org
Reposted by Roland Hatzenpichler
cryoempapers.bsky.social
Correlative MS Imaging for cellular identification and analysis of in situ cryo-ET www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.09.16.676641v1 #cryoem
Reposted by Roland Hatzenpichler
madhupai.bsky.social
PubMed is in trouble

This is beyond bad for medical research

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
environmicrobio.bsky.social
Obwohl natürlich auch mal ein blindes Hund ein Korn finden kann gehe ich grundsätzlich davon aus, dass alles wogegen die FPOe wettert zu befürworten ist. Und in der Regel, je lautet sie kreischt, desto Unterstützung würdiger.
environmicrobio.bsky.social
Oh it is. It was more tongue in cheek. But I do think arguments can be made for a two domain tree of life :)
environmicrobio.bsky.social
According to this sheet red blood cells are prokaryotes because they lack a nucleus.
environmicrobio.bsky.social
Wish I could be there for archaea specific meetings ;(
environmicrobio.bsky.social
Second domain? Eukarya no more?!
environmicrobio.bsky.social
I said it before and say it again. For every person who does metagenomics, we need 100 people who are doing the experimental work to test all the hypotheses raised by genomics.
environmicrobio.bsky.social
I agree, there’s enough metagenomics data around to keep experimentalists busy for the next hundred years or more ;)
environmicrobio.bsky.social
They'd pay a company to sequence and withhold the data from NCBI as long as possible. So I think your example is mostly theoretical.
environmicrobio.bsky.social
I am not saying that the latter example is theoretically impossible but I assume that a person who doesn't want people to have access to "their" data wouldn't put them on a server before publication and they wouldn't work with a public sequencing center like JGI in the 1st place.
environmicrobio.bsky.social
I am not saying that the latter example is theoretically possible but I assume that a person who doesn't want people to have access to "their" data wouldn't put them on a server or work with JGI in the 1st place. They'd pay a company to sequence and withold it from NCBI as long as possible.
environmicrobio.bsky.social
As I said before in this thread, there's no way to enforce it. More importantly, we ask for contacting the creators ONLY if the dataset has no associated publication. Personally, I think this should just be common courtesy. I don't see it as a problem to ask if my analyses would scoop another person
environmicrobio.bsky.social
Why do you think this creates a gatekeeping problem?
environmicrobio.bsky.social
Even if this would be mainly a JGI problem, which is it is not, the fact is that a lot of sequencing data these days is generated by them. And because everyone in the world can use their sequencing facilities Everyone is affected.
environmicrobio.bsky.social
The other group basically told everyone, not only my own group which by comparison was only minimally affected, to fuck off. Those problems effectively told me that I need to be more protective of the interests of my mentees.
environmicrobio.bsky.social
To me personally, yes, problems with the JGI policy would cost me to be involved in this effort in the first place. My lab data was scooped twice in the last three years. in one case we came to an understanding with the other researchers who had made an honest mistake and we were able to correct it.
Reposted by Roland Hatzenpichler
cellarchlab.com
EXCITING NEWS!! We're searching for a new professor colleague at the Biozentrum🇨🇭. Ideal candidates are exploring novel biological questions with structure, biophysics, or high-resolution imaging. 🧪 🧶🧬 🔬

The call closes Nov 3. Please get in touch if you would like more information. Come join us! 👩‍🔬🤓
environmicrobio.bsky.social
That said, I agree that hearing from all community members and getting a broader support base would be better.
environmicrobio.bsky.social
Separately, reviewers or journals often require data accessibility at time of review.