Night of the Living Fred 🎃🦇☠️💾✨️
@esquiring.bsky.social
4.4K followers 2K following 390 posts
21st century digital attorney. cybersecurity & data counsel, privacy & compliance, FOSS, sometimes litigation; probably not your lawyer. ~~☆~~
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Night of the Living Fred 🎃🦇☠️💾✨️
alexhanna.bsky.social
As an instructor, I'd rather see your fever dream, No Doze-fueled 4AM essays written at an IHOP rather than anything generated by an LLM.

Hope this helps
monkeyminion.com
I wrote a 15 page report on heraldic symbolism in medieval armor and weapon design for my art history class the night before it was due (8am class). Made up 90% of it (only found one book for reference) and got an A. GenAI could fucking never.
wrote 20 pages on Faulkner's The Bear four hours before final papers were due on trucker pills and coffee and cigarettes and got an A, fuck you.
You people couldn't hang with real slackers.
finn
wokeupchic • 4d
It's fuck Al till your homework due in 25 minutes
Reposted by Night of the Living Fred 🎃🦇☠️💾✨️
dillo.media
i will vote for anybody who fixes the headlight brightness situation
Reposted by Night of the Living Fred 🎃🦇☠️💾✨️
atherton.bsky.social
REI easily top of the list of companies most likely to do a land acknowledgement before layoffs
esquiring.bsky.social
same. and I've seen ... a lot of unusual shit in federal court prior to these days.
esquiring.bsky.social
Chowder.
merriam-webster.com
What’s the word where you’re from that, when pronounced exactly as it looks, identifies a tourist immediately?
Reposted by Night of the Living Fred 🎃🦇☠️💾✨️
bmceuen.bsky.social
I really feel like millennials especially resent the copyright theft part of these AI data centers because of this.
reactionordinary.bsky.social
The RIAA was suing teenagers. We had to sit through ⬇️ this shit anytime we wanted to watch a DVD. A whole generation shamed for using Limewire and torrents. Only for these silicone valley assholes to now find copyright infringement a necessary evil they shouldn’t have to answer for
You wouldn’t steal a car
esquiring.bsky.social
I have not, but would love to if they're public!
esquiring.bsky.social
I have strong thoughts and feelings about this, but I bet someone's spit out an entire law review article on it already somewhere.

I'd cite the google book-scanning cases as a turning point when "if your pockets are deep enough" became an unspoken additional fair-use factor.
esquiring.bsky.social
sounds like they were going to hitch a ride with the ARC Rally?
Reposted by Night of the Living Fred 🎃🦇☠️💾✨️
Reposted by Night of the Living Fred 🎃🦇☠️💾✨️
thewoodlandman.bsky.social
Not particularly enjoying being correct about this, actually.
clarajeffery.bsky.social
Just have to take a beat to say that the people that have long warned about state violence and the militarization of law enforcement were right.
Reposted by Night of the Living Fred 🎃🦇☠️💾✨️
dly.bsky.social
haha ok go off, my liege
You will not get any automated email henceforth.
esquiring.bsky.social
sort of a tangent but I'd love to know if the hive[dot]ai folks are aware of that issue, and what their explanation for it is.
hive.ai
esquiring.bsky.social
(but accepting your premise that any system would flag that image, I'd argue that's a strong case for "the tech isn't mature enough yet, turn it off and let users tag the post for human review if needed")
Reposted by Night of the Living Fred 🎃🦇☠️💾✨️
esquiring.bsky.social
I think that's where we're seeing differently here - I think a properly configured automated system shouldn't find anything flag-worthy in image 4.
esquiring.bsky.social
that excludes a big middle ground there, in that most automated content moderation tools have pretty tunable settings for what gets escalated for human review.

(I'd still argue those tools dish out too many false positives to be better than manual "report->review->decide" moderation in practice)
esquiring.bsky.social
for the foreseeable future, I predict this mostly leads to a boom in video authenticity expert challenges, with no substantive rule changes for ~1 decade at least.
esquiring.bsky.social
exactly. but, also, in both crim and civil cases, a load-bearing form of evidence that both sides would be loath to give up.
esquiring.bsky.social
I broadly like that technical solution (reminds me of PGP-based message verification ideas going back to the '90s)

the tough part is, you'd still need a rules or norms update that essentially says "video is presumed inauthentic & inadmissible unless [reliable technical solution] is used."