Fred Bordignon
@freddie2310.bsky.social
630 followers 190 following 53 posts
Researcher at LISIS & NanoBubbles team member Research Integrity Officer & Bibliometrician at École nationale des ponts et chaussées Blog: carnetist.hypotheses.org Publications: https://cv.archives-ouvertes.fr/frederique-bordignon
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Fred Bordignon
willemhalffman.bsky.social
Announcing Colloquium: Problematic Science. With presentations by @elisabethbik.bsky.social and @stanvanpelt.bsky.social. RU, 14 oct.
Reposted by Fred Bordignon
deevybee.bsky.social
Open Science Workshop - detecting errors and misconduct in science
Dates: 20-22 October
Location: Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Registration link: tinyurl.com/3xkd8twf
ONLY PHYSICAL ATTENDENCE POSSIBLE! NO ONLINE POSSIBILITIES.
Reposted by Fred Bordignon
bibliometrie-info.bsky.social
First insights into address unification in OpenAlex, WoS & Scopus.
Findings: OpenAlex holds more unique addresses, but fewer item–address combinations. The share of addresses unified by our KB approach is lower than in proprietary DBs—yet promising & likely to improve. tinyurl.com/mv2xdtrc
Address Information in OpenAlex, Web of Science, and Scopus: First Insights
tinyurl.com
Reposted by Fred Bordignon
marind.bsky.social
Pour la première fois à l’échelle d’un pays entier, la France, une étude indépendante montre que les pratiques de #scienceouverte sont associées à une augmentation des citations.
ouvrirlascience.bsky.social
Le Comité pour la science ouverte est heureux d’annoncer la sortie d’un prépublication qui montre, pour la première fois à l’échelle d’un pays entier, la France, que les pratiques de #scienceouverte sont associées à une augmentation des citations.
www.ouvrirlascience.fr/pour-la-prem...

@plos.org
Une étude sur les effets des pratiques de science ouverte sur les citations
Reposted by Fred Bordignon
sholtodavid.bsky.social
In 2024 I cycled from the UK to China. I finally finished a vlog, so here it is if you'd like to watch it. It's a glorified holiday album with some complaints and maps 😂 youtu.be/MdgHZPfivVA
Cycling Alone from the UK to China: 10,000 km in 90 days
YouTube video by Sholto David
youtu.be
Reposted by Fred Bordignon
maosbot.bsky.social
5,290 papers will be published at NeurIPS this year. If you could still get the proceedings in a book, it would be like 50,000 pages long. That’s 14.5 papers a day to read each and every day until the next NeurIPS
Reposted by Fred Bordignon
eollion.bsky.social
Un article collectif analyse la place du genre dans les sciences sociales. Qui mobilise cette perspective, quand et comment le fait-on ? L’article propose un tableau original de la part du genre dans les sciences sociales.
shs.cairn.info/revue-actes-...
Reposted by Fred Bordignon
deevybee.bsky.social
saying you’ll stand up for attacks on science in the US while honouring the person responsible for the attacks is like handing out bandages to people who are being savaged by your pet dog, while doing nothing to restrain him
Reposted by Fred Bordignon
joelwwood.bsky.social
Whoa! Elsevier fired @richardtol.bsky.social, longstanding Editor-in-Chief of the journal Energy Economics. Richard's side of the story should be ringing alarm bells. #EconSky

Fraud and cover-up
richardtol.substack.com/p/fraud-and-...
Fraud and cover-up
Fraud and cover-up
richardtol.substack.com
Reposted by Fred Bordignon
preprints.bsky.social
In July, ASAPbio @asapbio.bsky.social, Creative Commons, and major research funders launched a Preprint Policy Framework.
It outlines six best-practice components. We broke it down in a blog post, check it: buff.ly/2JMpTeL

#AcademicSky #AcWri #SciWri
Reposted by Fred Bordignon
sabinaleonelli.bsky.social
A quick reminder to all those who care about open research to consider joining us for the FOR2026 Conference in the Future of Open Research at the Technical University of Munich in May 4-6, 2026! Deadline for paper and poster proposals: 30 September

opensciencestudies.eu/for-2026-con...
FOR 2026 Conference – A Philosophy of Open Science for Diverse Research Environments
opensciencestudies.eu
Reposted by Fred Bordignon
pharmed-out.bsky.social
Bernisson and Sismondo: How big is the medical writing industry? Why it matters
> 1000 medical education and communication companies (MECCS) provide medical writing services, mostly sponsored by pharmaceutical, medical device, and biotechnology companies
academic.oup.com/heapro/artic...
How big is the medical writing industry? Why it matters
Abstract. Medical writing is a key element in pharmaceutical companies’ efforts to shape the relevant medical science literature. As part of what is called
academic.oup.com
Reposted by Fred Bordignon
doccrenau.bsky.social
#OpenAccess #Publication #Edition #APC
"The open access movement has been successful at making papers freely available, but perhaps it has now run its course as a useful way of thinking about the future of publishing. "
Reposted by Fred Bordignon
rmaruy.bsky.social
Is AI opening up a new golden age of science, or is it about to mess it up?
How do we even begin to talk about it? 🧵
Reposted by Fred Bordignon
odedrechavi.bsky.social
"We added the requested experiments and thank the reviewers for their helpful suggestions"
Reposted by Fred Bordignon
hollyhoye.bsky.social
“Well I don’t like that study because it doesn't give me the result I want’
freddie2310.bsky.social
🤔
clarivateag.bsky.social
NEWS // To enable flexible discovery and comprehensive research evaluation, the Web of Science platform now provides expanded content for customers in the new Research Commons database.

Learn more: clarivate.com/academia-gov...
Reposted by Fred Bordignon
steamtraen.eu
JAMA's data sharing policy is a joke. "We will not share our data with anybody" is an acceptable data availability statement.

On that basis, it's maybe not unreasonable that they won't enforce sharing against the people who pretended that they would, because they could have said they wouldn't. 🤷‍♂️
Reposted by Fred Bordignon
benpatrickwill.bsky.social
Peer reviewers are exhausted. It's common to spend *months* inviting reviewers, getting refusals, inviting more, maybe 12 or more, then 2 agree but 1 doesn't complete, so you go again. That's why your paper is in limbo. I'm very sorry, it's awful, but it's also an untenable academic labour issue.