Hayley Bounds
@hayleybounds.bsky.social
180 followers 270 following 14 posts
Systems/computational neuroscience postdoc @ Columbia in the Losonczy and Fusi labs. Schmidt Science Fellow. Formerly Adesnik lab @ UC Berkeley.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Hayley Bounds
moraogando.bsky.social
Thrilled to share our new Adesnik lab paper!!
Using holography in excitatory & inhibitory neurons, we reveal how a single cortical circuit can both complete and cancel predictable sensory activity, sharpening representations
📄https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.08.02.668307v1
🧵
hayleybounds.bsky.social
Certainly true! These two things are related but not the same. This is actually a bit of a misstatement in the article as in the study we don’t look at response strength but at neurons based on their visual information (measured by ROC) metrics and find that they do not appear to be weighted more.
Reposted by Hayley Bounds
nmwilkinson.bsky.social
Oh! Seems like a big deal, this. Makes sense too. Like, how would the rest of the brain know which neurons to sample, and if it did already know what the stimulus is, then it wouldn't need those neurons' signals to classify it.
Reposted by Hayley Bounds
markhisted.org
This is a simplistic but commonly-held view about how science actually works.

Doing rigorous& impactful science often means ignoring (some) null results.

Intermediate results, null and positive, arise on the way to a publishable contribution, and not all are perfectly rigorous.🧪#neuroscience 1/
johnholbein1.bsky.social
“just 68% of the 7,057 researchers whose work had produced null results had shared them in some form, and just 30% had tried to publish them in a journal.”

What a joke.

#NullEffectsMatter

www.nature.com/articles/d41...
Researchers value null results, but struggle to publish them
Survey finds that fear of reputational harm and a lack of support and publication platforms are among respondents’ key concerns.
www.nature.com
Reposted by Hayley Bounds
carandinilab.net
A new study led by @timothysit.bsky.social reveals that different layers of mouse V1 integrate visual and non-visual signals differently.

Activity is dominated by vision (or spontaneous fluctuations) in L2/3 and by movement in L5. This leads to different geometries.
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
Reposted by Hayley Bounds
neurograce.bsky.social
Reminder that we still have time to fight this! This bill is being crafted & debated in the coming days and weeks. Organize NOW to do outreach and get people in your neighborhood contacting their reps. @standupforscience.bsky.social has resources. Instructions for Postcards-for-Science are here:
Reposted by Hayley Bounds
Reposted by Hayley Bounds
maggieastor.bsky.social
Breaking: The Trevor Project received a stop-work order last night on its contract with the national 988 suicide prevention hotline. The Trump administration is eliminating the option for LGBTQ callers to the hotline to press 3 and connect with someone who specializes in LGBTQ mental health.
Reposted by Hayley Bounds
neurosutras.bsky.social
New #NeuroAI #compneurosky preprint! To better understand how target-directed learning works in the brain, we sought to engineer an artificial neural network capable of solving complex image classification tasks that comprises only experimentally-supported biological building blocks. (1/15)
Reposted by Hayley Bounds
hayleybounds.bsky.social
But also we try to be clearer on this in the paper but it’s hard in short form- we show that visual/task coding properties don’t determine read out but read out based on projection target is possible. I’d love to test that directly in the future!
hayleybounds.bsky.social
Yeah this is an important point. Recurrent excitation in V1 could mean that neurons are recruiting more neurons and so they recruit neurons with all the important projection targets. I believe the great majority of L2/3 neurons connect to L5 which is an important output route.
hayleybounds.bsky.social
But I wouldn’t be surprised if we still find the strategy is a bit different than that predicted by decoders! Like Jin et al 2019 showing that mice don’t seem to use negative weights on anti tuned neurons in their read out for orientation discrimination, even though that’s probably helpful
hayleybounds.bsky.social
I’d speculate I’d see the same in other discrimination tasks where averaging regardless of neural vis properties is viable. But different oris of equal contrast stimuli drive very similar average V1 activity, so that presumably needs different strategy. Marshel et al 2019 also supports this idea.
hayleybounds.bsky.social
I definitely don't think I would've gotten the same results in several common discrimination tasks (ie orientation discrimination). But, in addition to your results, Gauld et al's 2024 photostim results are also consistent with averaging occurring in discrim when the task is amenable to it.
hayleybounds.bsky.social
Take that with a grain of salt though since this spontaneous dataset isn’t huge!
hayleybounds.bsky.social
Thanks! We did look at this a little. Generally PCA pulls out components related to visual or task variables so you get the same results. But I also ran PCA on only intertrial activity and didn’t see any link between weights and behavioral relevance
Reposted by Hayley Bounds
qlu.bsky.social
I’m thrilled to announce that I will start as a presidential assistant professor in Neuroscience at the City U of Hong Kong in Jan 2026!
I have RA, PhD, and postdoc positions available! Come work with me on neural network models + experiments on human memory!
RT appreciated!
(1/5)
Reposted by Hayley Bounds
shahabbakht.bsky.social
These very cool findings match up perfectly with our human psychophysics data from this paper: jov.arvojournals.org/article.aspx...

Brains are fine using dumb (aka suboptimal) strategies when they can get away with it.
hayleybounds.bsky.social
This argues that downstream regions summate V1 activity without preferentially weighting more informative neurons to make sensory decisions in this task. Why use a suboptimal strategy? Speculatively, this generalizable strategy may be better in unpredictable natural environs.