you're not steampunk and i'm telling everyone
@homarus.bsky.social
220 followers 480 following 540 posts
what kind of a world have we gone and created here?
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by you're not steampunk and i'm telling everyone
melissagiragrant.com
What we’re seeing now is not people “[beginning] to view their own government’s security forces as an occupying army”—the federal agents are becoming an occupying army, and the violence is theirs. The violence is already here.
calebcrain.bsky.social
Chilling insight by @barbarafwalter.com: "Once citizens view their own government’s security forces as an occupying army, violence becomes inevitable. Trump’s team knows this… They’re trying to trigger the very unrest that would justify further crackdowns."

via www.nytimes.com/2025/10/07/o...
Screenshot from a NYT article by Thomas Edsall, quoting Barbara Walter of UC-San Diego: "The quickest way to piss people off is to send soldiers into their neighborhoods especially when there’s no reason for them to be there. It’s inherently provocative, and Trump and his team understand this. Research by the political scientist Robert Pape shows that the single most powerful predictor of suicide terrorism is the presence of foreign troops on local soil. People hate, hate, hate that. They hate the humiliation, the powerlessness, the feeling of being occupied.

"Once citizens begin to view their own government’s security forces as an occupying army, violence becomes inevitable. Trump’s team knows this. In fact, that’s the point. They are not trying to restore order; they’re trying to trigger the very unrest that would justify further crackdowns. In the end, violence serves their ultimate end: They want to create the illusion of disorder so they can tighten control and stay in power indefinitely."
homarus.bsky.social
most people got wise to Worcester, so now I'd say Haverhill, probably
merriam-webster.com
What’s the word where you’re from that, when pronounced exactly as it looks, identifies a tourist immediately?
homarus.bsky.social
I reserve all of my ire for media organizations and not for individual posters. And it's certainly not just you, lots of people, including myself, have been using "less than lethal". It's natural when it's what is written in practically every article.
homarus.bsky.social
If I had to venture a guess--and that's all it is, a guess--this language comes straight out of LEO and military PR, and media is just rehashing the words that were given to them, AKA the process that gave us the "officer involved shooting". Same shit, different day.
homarus.bsky.social
Maybe there are specific definitions for each of these terms in law enforcement and military circles, I don't know. But I've seen this change in the way the media talks about this kind of ammunition, and I don't think it's because they're trying to use the correct technical jargon.
homarus.bsky.social
Not a critique of the OP, just a thought:
The phrase "less than lethal" bothers me. We moved from "non-lethal" to "less lethal" in acknowledgement that this kind of ammunition can kill a person. Since then, it's slipped to "less than lethal", which again has a false implication of non-lethality.
rockshrimp.bsky.social
one thing I learned during 2020 is that "less than lethal" munitions are explicitly designed to be shot into the ground so they lose velocity and bounce up into people and the reason I didn't know that before is literally NO ONE has ever deployed them that way.
jackjenkins.me
Reporter's notebook: I actually began working on this story shortly after footage of the incident showed up last month.

But by the time I finally got ahold of folks, the story grew: 2 *other* faith leaders I spoke with *also* reported being shot w/pepper balls while protesting this ICE facility.
homarus.bsky.social
it bothers me more than it should that he uses all caps for these and not the Truly Trumpian Randomly Capitalized Words
homarus.bsky.social
we can't afford to lose Stavvy in a time like this
Reposted by you're not steampunk and i'm telling everyone
cheryllynneaton.bsky.social
Trans rights are civil rights. If you aren't willing to die on the hill of trans rights, then you aren't willing to die on the hill of Black rights. Of Jewish rights. Of disabled rights. Of gay rights. Of anyone's rights. Human rights.
talleststone.bsky.social
I hate to say it but the majority of the country is not going to die on the hill of trans rights. We can’t protect ANY groups if we can’t win a national election, so purity tests only serve to make specific groups feel triumphant. That’s not “erasing” them; it’s long-horizon strategy.
Reposted by you're not steampunk and i'm telling everyone
swingingstorm.bsky.social
Eternally disturbed by the number of Democrats who seem to see “affirming everyone’s basic right to freedom and safety is just too radical” as a reasonable argument.
homarus.bsky.social
Fuck off outta here with this garbage. Trans rights are non-negotiable. Liberation means all of us, not just some of us.
talleststone.bsky.social
I hate to say it but the majority of the country is not going to die on the hill of trans rights. We can’t protect ANY groups if we can’t win a national election, so purity tests only serve to make specific groups feel triumphant. That’s not “erasing” them; it’s long-horizon strategy.
homarus.bsky.social
there's not an AI that exists that could accurately recreate the faces he's making
asslatam.bsky.social
President Javier Milei of Argentina had a rock show to celebrate his new book, called "La Construcción del Milagro" (The Construction of the Miracle).
homarus.bsky.social
"There never should've been Die Hard sequels" is a frankly deranged opinion, and I reject it wholesale.
Reposted by you're not steampunk and i'm telling everyone
veryimportant.lawyer
We are bringing back “Sphincter Boy” as an insult. We are growing waynepilled and we are garthmaxxing
Reposted by you're not steampunk and i'm telling everyone
homarus.bsky.social
I ultimately like the s/t better but Toxicity is great. Going to have to put it on today.
homarus.bsky.social
First one of these I've ever seen that almost perfectly aligns with my boundaries. It's the partial states that take it from "correct" to "extremely correct".
homarus.bsky.social
While "potential constitutional crisis" isn't in any way wrong, I think it may be understating the potential ramifications of this
bradmossesq.bsky.social
Texas proudly invading Illinois.

It’s hard to describe the level of potential constitutional crisis here.
homarus.bsky.social
what really gets to me is how lazy this is. you could create these background photos with a digital camera and ten minutes in Photoshop.
homarus.bsky.social
This is such a dim view of humanity that it almost feels like I'm being insulted.
shrikant.bsky.social
That's a very dismissive construct of LLMs, IMHO. Yes they are stochastic and yes they are 'robotic' but here's a sentence for you to ponder:

Humans are just advanced language output algorithms that spit out returns based on input and their reference library.
homarus.bsky.social
Oh nice I didn't know AMC even did 70mm IMAX anywhere. Seeing it for a second time today, this time in regular 70mm. First viewing was in VistaVision.