James Packard Love
@jamielove.bsky.social
1.9K followers 1.8K following 2.1K posts
I work at https://keionline.org/jamie. Best known for work on intellectual property rights, and find most interesting ways to reform incentives and also build out global norms and mechanisms to increase the supply of public goods. Economics background.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by James Packard Love
gregsargent.bsky.social
JB Pritzker and Gavin Newsom are doing something new and important: They understand Stephen Miller's theory of fascist power politics, and they've developed a theory on how to combat it. More Dems need to reckon with Miller's understanding of the moment.

New from me:
newrepublic.com/article/2014...
Inside Stephen Miller’s Secret Plan to Normalize Trump’s Dictator Rule
He wants to supercharge searing civil tensions to get low-information voters to embrace their inner authoritarian. Exactly two Democrats appear to fully grasp this.
newrepublic.com
Reposted by James Packard Love
atrupar.com
Trump calls for Brandon Johnson and JB Pritzker to be imprisoned
Chicago Mayor should be in jail for failing to protect Ice Officers! Governor Pritzker also!
Reposted by James Packard Love
jeisinger.bsky.social
Once they wanted to dismantle the Dept of Education.

Now these activists want to use it for their own goals.

One of those? Eliminating public schooling.

@megomatz.bsky.social & @jsmithrichards.bsky.social
www.propublica.org/article/educ...
Reposted by James Packard Love
Reposted by James Packard Love
denisedwheeler.bsky.social
Reuters photographer Jonathan Ernst noticed that Bondi flipped open a file during the Senate hearing and he zoomed in.

Inside were her crib notes for attacking the senators.

The GOP now practicing Cliff's Notes Fascism

In other words, under oath Bondi was purely a performance.
Bondi senate hearing had a folder full of notes for attacking the senators Bondi senate hearing had a folder full of notes for attacking the senators Bondi senate hearing had a folder full of notes for attacking the senators Bondi senate hearing had a folder full of notes for attacking the senators
Reposted by James Packard Love
thetnholler.bsky.social
CNN: “An older couple making $85K/year will see their yearly insurance premiums jump from $7K to $25,000 — 30% of their income.” 😳#TrumpShutdown #TrumpHealthCareTax

This is what Dems are drawing attention to and want fixed. Now, not later.
jamielove.bsky.social
Ireland's basic income support to artists. €325 a week. Unconditional, regular payments to eligible artists and creative workers, allowing them to focus on their practice without the pressure of commercial viability.

www.rte.ie/culture/2025...
Budget 2026: Basic Income for Artists Scheme to become permanent
The Government's basic income scheme for artists is set to become a permanent fixture from next year, with 2,000 new places to be made available under Budget 2026.
www.rte.ie
Reposted by James Packard Love
strandjunker.com
They’re not acting like they’re in a four-year term.

They’re acting like they’re in an everlasting dictatorship.

Are we all clear on this?
Reposted by James Packard Love
felicityhannah.bsky.social
This article manages to name her husband before it names… her.
Article reads:
Woman named as Archbishop of Canterbury in historic first 

The 63-year-old archbishop-designate is married to Eamonn Mullally, with whom she has two children. Originally from Woking in Surrey, she was the UK's chief nursing officer from 1999 to 2004.
jamielove.bsky.social
MAGA does not want people to police Trump's police state.

www.msn.com/en-us/news/t...
MSN
www.msn.com
Reposted by James Packard Love
gavinyamey.bsky.social
One of the things I’m angriest about is that horrific anti-vaxx video that RFK Jr, Jay Bhattacharya, & Marty Makary made & posted to X, telling pregnant people that COVID vaccination is no longer recommended

It was extraordinarily damaging & it flew in the face of all the evidence

Ugh
maggieastor.bsky.social
New: The CDC acknowledges that pregnancy, in and of itself, is a high-risk condition for severe Covid. Yet it removed its vaccine recommendation for pregnant people without other conditions. Its contradictory messaging, plus the Trump admin's broader actions/inaction on vaccines, has reduced access.
Covid Shots Protect Pregnant Women, but Getting Them Now Can Be Hard
www.nytimes.com
Reposted by James Packard Love
strandjunker.com
For years we warned about this: The “Enabling Act of 1933”, which allowed Hitler to seize control of all branches of the German government, served as the template for “Project 2025” — and Trump’s DNA is all over it.
jamielove.bsky.social
I like to see players like Mac Jones succeed, after being written off.
Reposted by James Packard Love
ronfilipkowski.bsky.social
Trumpnomics: Get tariff money from US consumers on Chinese goods. Our farmers can’t sell their products because the Chinese refuse to pay our tariffs. China buys from farmers in Argentina instead. We send Argentina $20 billion. Then we pay our farmers to throw their crops away.
Reposted by James Packard Love
stevevladeck.bsky.social
It's worth asking how differently things might look on the ground right now if #SCOTUS hadn't eviscerated Bivens—and made it all-but impossible to bring damages suits against federal officers (like ICE agents) who violate our constitutional rights.

This is from my rebuttal in Hernández v. Mesa:
I do want to go back to putting this case in the broader context because I think it's important to understand how we got here. Historically, the whole way that the tort liability regime worked for government misconduct was that this Court and state courts looked to existing common law causes of action and focused on immunity defenses as the way of calibrating the harm that citizens and others faced when injured by government officers against the need to protect officers acting in good faith, back to Judge Hand in Gregoire
versus Biddle. 

The Court struck this balance by fashioning immunity defenses where the fight would be over whether the officer was entitled to immunity or not. And for law enforcement officers specifically, this Court has long
rejected the argument that there should be any context in which law enforcement officers, because of the frequency with which they
interact with average individuals, because of the nature of their interactions, because of the powers they have to search, to seize, to arrest in this context, to use lethal force, did not justify absolute immunity and instead justified a more narrower, qualified kind of immunity for those most likely to come face-to-face with private citizens.

Distilled to its simplest, the government's position in this case is that officers in what is self-described as the nation's largest law enforcement agency should have a functional absolute immunity at least where foreign nationals are concerned.

And our submission is that that is not consistent with how this Court has always understood the relationship between causes of action and immunity defenses in this context. It is not required by any of this Court's Bivens decisions. It does not abide by this Court's suggestion in Abbasi that there are strong reasons and powerful reasons to retain Bivens in this context.

And it would eliminate the one deterrence that is meaningfully available to ensure that officers in the nation's largest law enforcement agency are complying with the law.
jamielove.bsky.social
One of the all time great songs.
Reposted by James Packard Love
carlquintanilla.bsky.social
“.. What this administration is doing is unprecedented, illegal and flat-out wrong. .. I’ve been deeply engaged in our federal government for over 30 years and there is nothing that has come close.”

@nbcnews.com
www.nbcnews.com/politics/tru...