Jochem van Noord
@jochemvannoord.eu
360 followers 840 following 12 posts
Political sociologist education, inequality, politics http://jochemvannoord.eu
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
jochemvannoord.eu
🏁New paper! Social status moderates the effect of belief in meritocracy on economic conflict attitudes. Meritocracy doesn't always legitimize inequality and sometimes it does more :)

Published with @bramspruyt.bsky.social Filip Van Droogenbroeck and @tkupp.bsky.social

doi.org/10.1111/1468...
Title page of "Caught Between Ideology and Self‐Interest: Subjective
Social Status and Meritocratic Beliefs Shape Whether
People Perceive, Feel Anger About, and Want to Change
Economic Conflict"
Abstract: "Belief in meritocracy and social status are central to understanding how people think and behave in relation to economic conflict. In this paper, we investigate how belief in meritocracy is moderated by (subjective) social status for three different aspects of citizens' attitudes towards economic inequality and conflict, namely (1) perceived conflict, (2) anger about economic inequality and (3) intentions to change economic conflict (egalitarianism). Data from the International Social Survey Programme on 29 countries reveal that the effect of meritocracy depends on social status and differs meaningfully across the three attitudes. For people high in social status, belief in meritocracy relates to lower perceptions of conflict, anger, and egalitarianism. For people with a low subjective social status there is no or a weak relation of belief in meritocracy with the outcomes. In addition, when belief in meritocracy was low, those with a high subjective social status appeared to be concerned about inequality as they perceived more economic conflict and felt more anger than those with a low subjective social status. However, this was not the case for intentions to reduce inequality. Hence, these effects of meritocracy and social status should be understood in light of self-interest concerns of social groups, rather than solely ideological domination." Figure 1: Predicted values of conflict perception across belief in meritocracy and subjective social status. Figure 3: Predicted values of egalitarianism across belief meritocracy and subjective social status.
Reposted by Jochem van Noord
tomwgvdmeer.bsky.social
De mythe die niet sterft

Ook vandaag herhaalt Vullings dat de PvdA toch écht kiezers verloor aan de PVV. Nadat Marleen de Rooy de uitspraak van Yesilgöz terecht weerlegde (over de PvdA die veel kiezers zou hebben verloren aan de PVV), stelt Vullings dat die overloop langer geleden was dan in 2023.
jvanslageren.bsky.social
En daar is hij weer! Joost Vullings @eenvandaag.nl in podcast de stemming: "de pvda heeft de hoop die pvv kiezer waarvan in oorsprong een heel deel uit de sociaaldemocratie komt aan te trekken." Een stelling die meerdere keren als foutief is aangetoond, maar toch als een soort zombie wordt herhaalt🧵
Reposted by Jochem van Noord
tkupp.bsky.social
Only 10 days left to apply for this phd position on education-based identities, status, and political attitudes! Open to those interested in sociology, social psychology, political science, communication science or indeed a combination of all.

jobs.vub.be/job/Elsene-P...
PhD Researcher - Scientific project on Education-based social identities
PhD Researcher - Scientific project on Education-based social identities
jobs.vub.be
Reposted by Jochem van Noord
nilssteiner.bsky.social
If you are at the @ecpr-ead.bsky.social conference, come to @liranharsgor.bsky.social's panel on Tuesday 15:00 - 16:30 and hear Armin's talk. We document a growing gap in satisfaction with democracy between the lower and the higher educated using APC- analyses of Eurobarometer and ESS data.
arminschaefer.bsky.social
After missing my connecting train in Brussels, I am finally on my way to the @ecpr-ead.bsky.social conference. I will be presenting joint work with @nilssteiner.bsky.social on the interplay of education and cohorts in explaining differences in satisfaction with democracy. Looking forward!
This figures shows the average satisfaction with democracy for three education groups across different birth cohorts. In younger cohorts, the education gap in satisfaction with democracy is much wider. Based on waves 1 to 11 of the European Social Survey.
Reposted by Jochem van Noord
Reposted by Jochem van Noord
johnbijl.bsky.social
Polarisatie en wantrouwen in politiek wordt gevoed door juist dit soort sneren als nieuws te pushen. Nieuwsmedia zoals @nu.nl zouden beter moeten weten.
Reposted by Jochem van Noord
willemdekoster.bsky.social
📢 We're hiring a 4-year postdoc (0.8 FTE) at Erasmus Univ. Rotterdam for project on climate change meanings

Focus: Italian case (focus groups, survey, experiments)

PhD in Sociology (or related), fluent in Italian

🗓️ Deadline: June 11

#postdoc #sociology #academicjobs #Italy #climatechange
Postdoctoral researcher Sociology; Understanding climate change attitudes
What does climate change mean to people—and why? And how do these meanings shape public responses to policy and information campaigns?
www.academictransfer.com
Reposted by Jochem van Noord
danbischof.bsky.social
🚨 working paper (w. @morganlcj.bsky.social @markuswagner.bsky.social): Protesters are not judged equally - even if tactics of groups are similar.

We ran an experiment in 🇩🇪 testing how people react to farmers vs. climate activists blocking roads.

What we find is disturbing:

osf.io/preprints/os...
Reposted by Jochem van Noord
franstimmermans.groenlinkspvda.nl
De rode lijn is ver overschreden. Terwijl het kabinet Wilders-Yeşilgöz wegkijkt terwijl de regering van Netanyahu zich schuldig maakt aan oorlogsmisdaden, gaan Nederlanders de straat op met een heldere boodschap: kabinet, spreek je uit en voer de druk op! 1/3
Reposted by Jochem van Noord
sociusjournal.bsky.social
🏫 How central is schooling in your country?

In their new #Socius study, Drs. Kavadias, @bramspruyt.bsky.social & @tkupp.bsky.social introduce the Schooled Society Index—a global measure of how #education acts as a force of #institutionalization and #stratification.

Read: doi.org/10.1177/2378...
Reposted by Jochem van Noord
jvanslageren.bsky.social
En daar is hij weer! Joost Vullings @eenvandaag.nl in podcast de stemming: "de pvda heeft de hoop die pvv kiezer waarvan in oorsprong een heel deel uit de sociaaldemocratie komt aan te trekken." Een stelling die meerdere keren als foutief is aangetoond, maar toch als een soort zombie wordt herhaalt🧵
Reposted by Jochem van Noord
celytadeas.bsky.social
📢Proud to share my first publication in European Union Politics, now online and #OpenAccess! I examine which of 19 European countries (1990–2017) saw culture wars emerge in public opinion. I analyze how opinions and identities on morality and economic issues aligned into distinct ideological camps🧵
jochemvannoord.eu
Mooie meta-analyse in lijn met ons paper in PSPB èn met ons stuk in de Volkskrant: duidelijke ingroup bias onder hoger opgeleiden (en niet onder lager opgeleiden) in hun stemvoorkeuren
elizabethsim0n.bsky.social
Do we systematically prefer educated candidates? Or do educational groups select in ways that reward their own?

This article by @turnbulldugarte.com and I suggests the answers are yes, and yes - but only for the graduate group.

Huge thanks to all who shared their data with us!
thejop.bsky.social
"Education as Identity? A Meta-Analysis of Education-Based In-Group Preferences in Candidate Choice Experiments" by Elizabeth Simon and Stuart J. Turnbull-Dugarte.https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/730745
Reposted by Jochem van Noord
jjvpeperstraten.bsky.social
Hebben we net Frans en Duits afgeschaft, blijkt de toekomst Frans en Duits te zijn.
Reposted by Jochem van Noord
danielboomsma.bsky.social
Over die mythe van de ‘verloren arbeider’ aan rechts 🧵

Sociaaldemocratisch links stond massaal kiezers af, maar verloor die de afgelopen decennia in overgrote meerderheid aan groene partijen, andere linkse partijen en liberale (midden)partijen. 1/6
Reposted by Jochem van Noord
jochemvannoord.eu
🏁New paper! Social status moderates the effect of belief in meritocracy on economic conflict attitudes. Meritocracy doesn't always legitimize inequality and sometimes it does more :)

Published with @bramspruyt.bsky.social Filip Van Droogenbroeck and @tkupp.bsky.social

doi.org/10.1111/1468...
Title page of "Caught Between Ideology and Self‐Interest: Subjective
Social Status and Meritocratic Beliefs Shape Whether
People Perceive, Feel Anger About, and Want to Change
Economic Conflict"
Abstract: "Belief in meritocracy and social status are central to understanding how people think and behave in relation to economic conflict. In this paper, we investigate how belief in meritocracy is moderated by (subjective) social status for three different aspects of citizens' attitudes towards economic inequality and conflict, namely (1) perceived conflict, (2) anger about economic inequality and (3) intentions to change economic conflict (egalitarianism). Data from the International Social Survey Programme on 29 countries reveal that the effect of meritocracy depends on social status and differs meaningfully across the three attitudes. For people high in social status, belief in meritocracy relates to lower perceptions of conflict, anger, and egalitarianism. For people with a low subjective social status there is no or a weak relation of belief in meritocracy with the outcomes. In addition, when belief in meritocracy was low, those with a high subjective social status appeared to be concerned about inequality as they perceived more economic conflict and felt more anger than those with a low subjective social status. However, this was not the case for intentions to reduce inequality. Hence, these effects of meritocracy and social status should be understood in light of self-interest concerns of social groups, rather than solely ideological domination." Figure 1: Predicted values of conflict perception across belief in meritocracy and subjective social status. Figure 3: Predicted values of egalitarianism across belief meritocracy and subjective social status.
jochemvannoord.eu
We argue that effects of meritocracy should be seen in light of self-interest concerns and ideological sophistication. These things differ across social status groups, giving different results across different groups and attitudes. This nuances (simple) ideological domination accounts.
jochemvannoord.eu
🏁New paper! Social status moderates the effect of belief in meritocracy on economic conflict attitudes. Meritocracy doesn't always legitimize inequality and sometimes it does more :)

Published with @bramspruyt.bsky.social Filip Van Droogenbroeck and @tkupp.bsky.social

doi.org/10.1111/1468...
Title page of "Caught Between Ideology and Self‐Interest: Subjective
Social Status and Meritocratic Beliefs Shape Whether
People Perceive, Feel Anger About, and Want to Change
Economic Conflict"
Abstract: "Belief in meritocracy and social status are central to understanding how people think and behave in relation to economic conflict. In this paper, we investigate how belief in meritocracy is moderated by (subjective) social status for three different aspects of citizens' attitudes towards economic inequality and conflict, namely (1) perceived conflict, (2) anger about economic inequality and (3) intentions to change economic conflict (egalitarianism). Data from the International Social Survey Programme on 29 countries reveal that the effect of meritocracy depends on social status and differs meaningfully across the three attitudes. For people high in social status, belief in meritocracy relates to lower perceptions of conflict, anger, and egalitarianism. For people with a low subjective social status there is no or a weak relation of belief in meritocracy with the outcomes. In addition, when belief in meritocracy was low, those with a high subjective social status appeared to be concerned about inequality as they perceived more economic conflict and felt more anger than those with a low subjective social status. However, this was not the case for intentions to reduce inequality. Hence, these effects of meritocracy and social status should be understood in light of self-interest concerns of social groups, rather than solely ideological domination." Figure 1: Predicted values of conflict perception across belief in meritocracy and subjective social status. Figure 3: Predicted values of egalitarianism across belief meritocracy and subjective social status.
Reposted by Jochem van Noord
diehoren.bsky.social
This conversation between Thomas Piketty and Michael Sandel took my understanding of the current political moment to a higher level. I've gifted it to Bluesky, so the paywall at the NY Times won't interfere with your reading.
Opinion | Two of the World’s Leading Thinkers on How the Left Went Astray (Gift Article)
Thomas Piketty and Michael Sandel debate the value of open borders and what we owe migrants.
www.nytimes.com
Reposted by Jochem van Noord
nielsmede.bsky.social
Out now in Nature Human Behaviour: Our 68-country #survey on public attitudes to #science 📣
It shows: People still #trust scientists and support an active role of scientists in society and policy-making. #OpenAccess available here: www.nature.com/articles/s41... @natureportfolio.bsky.social
(1/13)
Reposted by Jochem van Noord
peterla.bsky.social
And here's the share without higher education!
Reposted by Jochem van Noord
bryanboyle.bsky.social
Mine and @dvandebroeck.bsky.social’s paper on ‘The Labor of Distinction’ is out now in ASR. Drawing from an ethnography that involved training and working as a butler, we tell a larger story about elites and inequality (1/18) journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
Reposted by Jochem van Noord
jamellebouie.net
and this is why it is an analytical mistake to use “voter without a college degree” to mean “working class voter”
sharonk.bsky.social
this is a YouGov/Jacobin poll but it is funny that it shows that the strongest affinity for swing voting class voters is for uh.... the petit bourgeois owner
Nothing produced a more positive response from poll respondents than hearing that a candidate was a small-business owner. It offered a bigger lift than any political position or demographic feature, and it was popular across Black, Latino and white respondents.
Voters also had positive feelings about candidates who were listed as being teachers, veterans or construction workers. Lawyers fared less well, and Fortune 500 C.E.O.s did worst of all.