Jonathan Bartlett
@jonathan-bartlett.bsky.social
980 followers 140 following 37 posts
Biostatistician, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine. Blogging at thestatsgeek.com
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
jonathan-bartlett.bsky.social
Thinking of performing a quantitative bias analysis for measurement error or misclassification? Then our recent software review, by Codie Wood, Kate Tilling, myself and Rachael Hughes, may be of interest: rdcu.be/eDRn2
Quantitative bias analysis for mismeasured variables in health research: a review of software tools | BMC Medical Research Methodology
rdcu.be
Reposted by Jonathan Bartlett
suziecro.bsky.social
Are estimands being correctly used?
A new review of protocols led by Timothy Clark shows many incorrectly defined estimand attributes. See the top areas for improvement & full results here:
trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.... #Trials
Reposted by Jonathan Bartlett
myramcguinness.bsky.social
September @vicbiostat.bsky.social seminar:

Camila Olarte Parra from @causalab.bsky.social Karolinska will speak on combining information from trial participants and non-participants in registry-based trials.

All welcome online 25 September.

More info:
www.vicbiostat.org.au/event/combin...
Combining information from trial participants and non-participants in registry-based trials
Even though the advantages of randomised tria
www.vicbiostat.org.au
Reposted by Jonathan Bartlett
myramcguinness.bsky.social
We are looking forward to hearing @jonathan-bartlett.bsky.social speak on the G-formula for causal inference using synthetic multiple imputation at the July @vicbiostat.bsky.social seminar!

All welcome online Thursday 24th, 4:00pm Aus EST (7:00am UK time).

www.vicbiostat.org.au/event/g-form...
G-formula for causal inference using synthetic multiple imputation
G-formula is a popular approach for estimatin
www.vicbiostat.org.au
Reposted by Jonathan Bartlett
gelovennan.bsky.social
HIRING!

2 PhD openings within the “Safe Causal Inference” consortium with experts from biostatistics, computer science, math, and epidemiology.

You'll develop new methods to evaluate prediction algorithms that take the causal effect of treatments into account.

👉 www.lumc.nl/en/about-lum....
PhD Candidates Causal machine learning – Performance assessment of causal predictive algorithms | LUMC
Do you want to work on challenging problems within causal inference and contribute to algorithms that support treatment decisions for individual patients? As PhD candidate causal machine learning at t...
www.lumc.nl
Reposted by Jonathan Bartlett
margaritamb.bsky.social
1/ NEW R PACKAGE! For estimating the impact of potential interventions on multiple mediators in countering exposure effects (led by @cttc101.bsky.social)

- Paper👉 tinyurl.com/ye26jsps
- Package👉 tinyurl.com/yuh4kens

Thread shows published examples of how the method can be used! #EpiSky #CausalSky
tinyurl.com
Reposted by Jonathan Bartlett
lshtm-dash.bsky.social
📣 Calling everyone working in #datascience #biostatistics #clinicaltrials

We’re bringing together experts on target-trial emulation and other frameworks, where we’ll explore the role and potential of observational data for evaluating the effects of interventions

Don’t miss out 🔽
bit.ly/TTE_25
Reposted by Jonathan Bartlett
lshtm-dash.bsky.social
🚨 Next month, we’ll be hosting a one-day event on target-trial emulation and other frameworks, exploring the role and potential of observational data for evaluating the effects of interventions

Open to everyone working in #datascience #biostatistics #clinicaltrials

Get your ticket 🔽
bit.ly/TTE_25
jonathan-bartlett.bsky.social
I probably misunderstand, but when you install a package it will install other packages it depends on. And then when you load the package with library() it loads the dependencies likewise.
Reposted by Jonathan Bartlett
ruthkeogh.bsky.social
📆 SAVE THE DATE: 26 June 📆 for our 1-day event on “Target trial emulation and other frameworks: The role and potential of observational data for evaluating effects of interventions”, hosted by the Centre for Data & Statistical Science for Health (DASH) at LSHTM. @lshtm-dash.bsky.social
jonathan-bartlett.bsky.social
Yes it could. These hypothetical estimands do indeed deviate from what I have always interpreted ITT to mean. For me ITT means analyse according to randomised group and look at outcomes irrespective of events such as treatment switch.
Reposted by Jonathan Bartlett
ghazalehd.bsky.social
📣 📣NEW PAPER providing guidance on best practice for using multiple imputation when estimating interventional mediation effects, considering missingness mechanism, multiple imputation model specification, & variance estimation
#CausalSky #EpiSky

Read more 👇🏽
journals.lww.com/epidem/abstr...
Handling multivariable missing data in causal mediation... : Epidemiology
miologic studies. However, guidance is lacking on best practice for using multiple imputation when estimating interventional mediation effects, specifically regarding the role of missingness mechanism...
journals.lww.com
Reposted by Jonathan Bartlett
aschuler.bsky.social
New paper! We extend my prior work on prognostic adjustment to work with generalized linear models. This is a nice way to gain power in randomized trials (eg with binary outcomes) by leveraging historical data in a way that does not sacrifice type I error control.

arxiv.org/abs/2503.22284
Powering RCTs for marginal effects with GLMs using prognostic score adjustment
In randomized clinical trials (RCTs), the accurate estimation of marginal treatment effects is crucial for determining the efficacy of interventions. Enhancing the statistical power of these analyses ...
arxiv.org
jonathan-bartlett.bsky.social
Sorry. I agree with you! My initial reaction/thinking was that in conditional imputation there are two variables in play, with one only defined in those for whom the first takes a certain value. But as you indicate, you can translate this into a problem with one variable. Thank you!
jonathan-bartlett.bsky.social
Probably looking at the example in the vignette will (hopefully!) make it clear.
jonathan-bartlett.bsky.social
Not the same I don't think. This is about a situation similar to censoring- you have partial info about the missing values. The smcfcs additions are though for factor variables, where instead of the exact category, you know someone belongs to one among a subset of the categories...
Reposted by Jonathan Bartlett
eurocim.bsky.social
The EuroCIM program is live! Explore the sessions, speakers, and schedule here: www.eurocim.org/program.html. Get ready for an exciting conference! 🎉