Joni Lovenduski
@jonilo.bsky.social
2.3K followers 1.6K following 370 posts
Feminist, retired professor of political science, Chair The Political Quarterly board, politics obsessed,cat lover, Bridge player, Italy, food.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
jonilo.bsky.social
Important observation by Theda SKOCPOL on US police state.
jonilo.bsky.social
Home office has long had a somewhat non accountable border force.
sundersays.bsky.social
A second offer to bring Trump-style deportations, chaos and cruelty, to Britain
jonilo.bsky.social
The conversation about the detail of the fascist take over of US government is about demonstrating that it is taking place. That ship has sailed. We already know.
Reposted by Joni Lovenduski
jonathanbernstein.bsky.social
Y'know there are some really excellent Private SNAFU educational cartoons from WWII that we could force these clowns to watch but I think they were too subtle, really.
kvetch.gay
this is wild: while Stephen Miller's guy was in Minnesota for his uncle's funeral, somebody was able to see his entire phone and take pictures of his Signal group chats talking about military deployments to Portland, and brought them to the Strib (gift link: www.startribune.com/trump-offici...)
Reposted by Joni Lovenduski
ksp2pdx.bsky.social
I keep thinking about those 800 Generals and Admirals who had to sit through 90 minutes of Hegseth and Trump…their faces were stone-like and without any emotion…… I think I felt that we might have the beginning of a real and powerful resistance movement that we hadn’t anticipated……🤞🙏
Reposted by Joni Lovenduski
timbale.bsky.social
Just had time to properly read this brilliant piece by @benansell.bsky.social. It left me even more convinced than I already was that what he calls Labour's (and indeed the Conservative's) "prole-whisperers" are horribly mistaken if they genuinely think chasing after Reform voters is the way to go.
British Politics' Midlife Crisis
Why British Parties Can't Make Peace with Their Actual Voters
benansell.substack.com
Reposted by Joni Lovenduski
weedenkim.bsky.social
My timeline, summarized:

"Nice university you've got there. It'd be a shame if anything happened to it."
Reposted by Joni Lovenduski
stevenbeschloss.bsky.social
Soon we’ll learn whether our military stand by the principles that define their duty to our country and the Constitution—or whether they break them to serve the depraved, degraded & lawless desires of a wannabe dictator and his sycophantic “War Secretary.”

www.americaamerica.news/p/snapshot-i...
Snapshot: "It's a War From Within"
Be clear: Trump will further exploit our military to wage war in our cities against our fellow Americans. That was the message he delivered to senior officers today.
www.americaamerica.news
Reposted by Joni Lovenduski
kevinmkruse.bsky.social
If they claim they haven't heard the quote, play it for them and ask for a response.

If they claim it's being taken out of context, play a longer version and ask for a response.

If they try to sidestep the issue, play it over again and ask for a response.
atrupar.com
STEPHANOPOULOS: Hold on a second. Answer the question. As Speaker, do you believe it's appropriate to use American cities as training grounds for the military, calling those people 'the enemy within'?

JOHNSON: I'm not comment on your characterization of what the president said.

S: Those are quotes
Reposted by Joni Lovenduski
carlosdiazruiz.com
Authoritarianism is boring.

My American friends believe that dictatorships are dramatic with public executions and whatnot. Unlike the movies, dictatorships are unexciting. Life goes on: people get groceries and struggle with bills, as usual.

Losing agency in your own society is mostly boring.
Reposted by Joni Lovenduski
vsapiro.bsky.social
Go home and think about what you did.
jonilo.bsky.social
So why would a member of an aspirant authoritarian government summon all the admirals and generals to a meeting?
Reposted by Joni Lovenduski
ottoenglish.bsky.social
The major political parties, broadcasters, and institutions should all leave X.

It's an extremely dangerous disinformation machine, and staying there only legitimises it and the chaotic agenda of the richest man in the world.

Who is a raving fucking lunatic.

www.theguardian.com/politics/202...
Ed Miliband says it is ‘possible’ that UK government should leave X
Energy minister says platform’s owner Elon Musk is a ‘dangerous man’ who is part of a ‘global network of right’
www.theguardian.com
Reposted by Joni Lovenduski
anandmenon.bsky.social
I have entered my old fart / grandee phase.
Reposted by Joni Lovenduski
samfr.bsky.social
To illustrate the point a pizza at Pizza Express is now £20 or you can get a rump steak at Hawksmoor for £27. The gap has really shrunk.
iguandonjim.bsky.social
Specifically around casual dining, a lot have been "invested" in by Private Equity, who want their return for the pension pots they serve. Casual high street dining is now competing with quite simply better restaurants for similar price points
harrywallop.co.uk
The £100 ‘Bill Shock’ in high street restaurants. What happens when a once affordable treat – at Wagamama/Bill’s/Pizza Express etc – becomes a luxury?
I have investigated…🧵
Reposted by Joni Lovenduski
lewisbaston.bsky.social
From a thread well worth reading. One might add that when Labour voters were drawn mostly from the manual working class, Labour… lost most of the time. Labour’s electoral coalition couldn’t win in 1955 and would be absolutely crushed in an electorate with the demographics of 2025.
benansell.bsky.social
Notice that everywhere except Southern Europe, the middle class have proven to be a much more important part of the left's coalition than the working class since the early 2000s. Labour strategists are pining for the early 1980s. Even then working class Brits today are cleaners not miners. 9/n
Reposted by Joni Lovenduski
daimoon.bsky.social
Pondering the post-war rise in U.S. mass shootings, a reminder the newly released JFK documents include an un-redaction that revels “the CIA “owned” the country’s largest importer and distributor of guns, the company that would spearhead a remarkable boom in gun ownership in the US” archive.ph/XaXSf
Because CIA archives are inaccessible, with the exception of the relatively few documents that have been declassified and redacted through the Freedom of Information Act process, Cummings’ file has never been available to researchers. And as for this specific document, researchers have seen it before—I cited it in my book, in fact—but key phrases were redacted. Now we know what was behind those black lines.
Summarizing Cummings’ file, the previously released redacted version of the document states that “On 17 August 1954 CUMMINGS became the principal agent of the [redacted] International Armaments Corporation and Interarmco.” In the newly released, unredacted version, it reads: “On 17 August 1954 CUMMINGS became the principal agent of the CIA-owned companies known as International Armaments Corporation and Interarmco” (emphasis mine).

In other words, the CIA “owned” the country’s largest importer and distributor of guns, the company that would spearhead a remarkable boom in gun ownership in the United States in the decade and a half before the Gun Control Act iced war-surplus imports.
Reposted by Joni Lovenduski
marstrina.bsky.social
This analysis is informative & important. However, here are three grains of salt:

1) It doesn't account for FPTP & vote distribution - if raw numbers like this drove electoral outcomes, Reform would have more seats than the LibDems. Targeting a small % of voters is how our system works. 》
benansell.bsky.social
On the morning of Keir Starmer's conference speech here's a new post on an odd psychopathology in British politics - our main parties don't like the people who vote for them - the dreaded Professional Managerial Class. And so they are acting out like a divorced dad seeking cooler voters. 1/n
British Politics' Midlife Crisis
Why British Parties Can't Make Peace with Their Actual Voters
benansell.substack.com
Reposted by Joni Lovenduski
timbale.bsky.social
I mean, how could the famously liberal owner of the Times possibly have imagined this sort of thing would come to pass when they appointed as the paper's editor someone who'd been deputy editor of the Mail and editor of both the Telegraph and the Sun?