Karl Pike
@karlpike.bsky.social
980 followers 350 following 45 posts
Senior Lecturer in Public Policy at Queen Mary University of London. Book: Getting Over New Labour.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
karlpike.bsky.social
My contribution to this issue calls for Labour to counter the growing illiberalism in British politics.
karlpike.bsky.social
Another fab read from Phil which mentions one of the best books written about Labour: Henry Drucker’s Doctrine and Ethos in the Labour Party.
Reposted by Karl Pike
duncanweldon.bsky.social
Retrospectively removing indefinite leave to remain would be immoral and economically damaging. It would tear families apart.
Attacking it as ‘potentially illegal’ is completely beside the point.
Argue with the (awful) idea. Don’t try ’well, actually you can’t do that’.
Reposted by Karl Pike
stellacreasy.bsky.social
We have to differentiate between defending the right of all to disagree and being indifferent to the impact of what is being said - the message from yesterday is not simply free speech is safe but that we need to work harder to counter those who claim division offers anything for our future.
Reposted by Karl Pike
philipjcowley.bsky.social
This moment never ceases to excite. Out in shops on 9 Sept...
Reposted by Karl Pike
mbarnfield.bsky.social
I have a new article out at @polstudies.bsky.social. In "Electoral Hope", I make the case that supposedly irrational "wishful thinking" is actually a crucial part of how voters make rational sense of their role in democracies.

OA link: doi.org/10.1177/0032...
Title page of article "Electoral Hope" in journal Political Studies.
Reposted by Karl Pike
peterla.bsky.social
The Norwegian Labour party (Ap) has kept their newfound popularity for 3 months now, while the pop. right Progress Party (Frp) is down ~5pp. Elections coming up early September.
Reposted by Karl Pike
mileendinstitute.bsky.social
Tonight, we are exploring what the 1975 and 2016 referendums can teach us about ‘How to Win a Referendum on Europe’.

We’re delighted to welcome Neil Carmichael, @sarahobolt.bsky.social and @anandmenon.bsky.social to QM, and to revisit @robertsaunders.bsky.social’s brilliant book, ‘Yes to Europe’!
The former Conservative MP, Neil Carmichael, speaking at the Mile End Institute on 10 June 2025. Professor Sara Hobolt speaking at the Mile End Institute on 10 June 2025. Professor Anand Menon speaking at the Mile End Institute on 10 June 2025. Dr Robert Saunders speaking at the Mile End Institute on 10 June 2025.
Reposted by Karl Pike
renewaljournal.bsky.social
Karl Pike (@karlpike.bsky.social): Social democracy is about equality
Reposted by Karl Pike
mbarnfield.bsky.social
Our paper “Long-Term Time Horizons and Support for Public Investment” is open access @psjeditor.bsky.social (w/ @karlpike.bsky.social @philipjcowley.bsky.social).

Whether the public supports policy that pays off in the long term depends on what “long term” means.

doi.org/10.1111/psj.70040
Title and abstract. Title: Long-Term Time Horizons and Support for Public Investment. Abstract: Generating public support for long term public investment may require understanding what citizens perceive as the “long term” in politics and how these perceptions shape their preferences. Across two studies, we find that UK citizens generally understand “long term” as 5–10 years. These perceptions appear to shape support for a real, salient, recent case of large-scale public investment: the October 2024 UK budget. Study 1 shows that stating the economic effects of the budget's public investment measures will come “in 50 years' time" rather than “over the longer term” reduces support—with some evidence the effect may be driven by those with the shortest perceived time horizons. Study 2 reveals that when the 5-year benefits of investment—within voters' typical long-term time horizon—are known, highlighting its 50-year benefits lowers support for public investment. But across the board, we find that a majority supports public investment when made aware of its economic effects over any time frame. These findings improve understandings of voters' purported short-termism in a contingent real-world context, with implications for the communication of long-term public policy.
Reposted by Karl Pike
npjgarland.bsky.social
Huge pleasure to work on this report, and IPPR’s new Decade of National Renewal programme, with the great Parth Patel, Jane Gingrich and Will Davies.
ippr.org
🚨 NEW REPORT: Progressive parties are losing the battle of ideas – and votes – to the populist right. The centre-left must reinvent or die. Today, we launch a new project to forge a bold new identity for progressives in the 21st century.

Read here: www.ippr.org/articles/fac...
Reposted by Karl Pike
colmpm.bsky.social
I'm thrilled to have been published in Past & Present.

Diving into the fractious politics of rich-country macroeconomics after 1973, I use the neglected case of protectionist Keynesians to rethink what happened, and why. I highlight statecraft, geopolitics, and Maier's 'territoriality'. (1/2)
Reposted by Karl Pike
duncanweldon.bsky.social
I’m old fashioned enough to think the BBC should be leading on what the deal is and what it means. Rather than the political claims from both sides.
karlpike.bsky.social
Bit from my review of the book Get In for Party Politics. Can read the full thing here (log-in required): journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
Comment from review of the book Get In about Starmer’s Labour and the lack of “vision”.
karlpike.bsky.social
It’s become a habit - hard to shift.
Reposted by Karl Pike
profjanegreen.bsky.social
People have real problems believing Reform voters don't come from Labour, if not recently, then in the past.

A small proportion do, but let's look at how far back you'd have to go now ...