Keith Raymond Harris
@kraymondh.bsky.social
840 followers 740 following 110 posts
Philosopher (social and applied epistemology, social media, misinformation, conspiracy theories) Dog poster Yoga guy
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
kraymondh.bsky.social
New paper out today in the APQ special issue on AI Ethics:

scholarlypublishingcollective.org/uip/apq/arti...

#philsky
#philtech
Abstract with the following text:
Emotive artificial intelligences are physically or virtually embodied entities whose behavior is driven by artificial intelligence, and which use expressions usually associated with emotion to enhance communication. These entities are sometimes thought to be deceptive, insofar as their emotive expressions are not connected to genuine underlying emotions. In this paper, I argue that such entities are indeed deceptive, at least given a sufficiently broad construal of deception. But, while philosophers and other commentators have drawn attention to the deceptive threat of emotive artificial intelligences, I argue that such entities also pose an overlooked skeptical threat. In short, the widespread existence of emotive signals disconnected from underlying emotions threatens to encourage skepticism of such signals more generally, including emotive signals used by human persons. Thus, while designing artificially intelligent entities to use emotive signals is thought to facilitate human-AI interaction, this practice runs the risk of compromising human-human interaction.
Reposted by Keith Raymond Harris
carlzimmer.com
Today my @nytimes.com colleagues and I are launching a new series called Lost Science. We interview US scientists who can no longer discover something new about our world, thanks to this year‘s cuts. Here is my first interview with a scientist who studied bees and fires. Gift link: nyti.ms/3IWXbiE
nyti.ms
Reposted by Keith Raymond Harris
iwriteok.bsky.social
war, war never changes.
courtneyvaughn.bsky.social
Streets are still closed off in front of the Portland ICE facility at 8:30pm. Protesters have gathered on a side street. Dance party in progress.
kraymondh.bsky.social
The president promoting an absurd medical conspiracy theory by posting a deepfake video of himself is about the most depressing convergence of my research interests imaginable.
alkapdc.bsky.social
Trump tonight appears to have pushed the false "medbed" conspiracy theory, which has spread in the far-right internet over the years. www.yahoo.com/news/qanon-c...
Reposted by Keith Raymond Harris
jasonread.bsky.social
The combination of extremely online stochastic nihilist meme brain violence and a government looking for its daily Reichstag fire to justify political suppression just seems really bad.
www.kenklippenstein.com/p/the-ice-sh...
The ICE Shooter’s Motive
Joshua Jahn's friends speak
www.kenklippenstein.com
kraymondh.bsky.social
"A conspiratorial crowd is getting the kind of evidence it craves, on an internet that supercharges conspiratorial speculating. At the same time, this is happening in a media ecosystem that makes it easier than ever for people to ignore, dismiss, or spin evidence to justify their prior viewpoints."
cwarzel.bsky.social
I wrote about what I think is a genuinely revealing document of elite depravity and impunity. It is shocking and sickening. But it's also a crucial moment. We're about to see what happens when conspiracy theorists actually get what they asked for but it turns out not to be what they want.
You Really Need to See Epstein’s Birthday Book for Yourself
This time, the conspiracy theorists were right.
www.theatlantic.com
kraymondh.bsky.social
Sure! Happy to look at a draft too in case it's helpful
kraymondh.bsky.social
I wouldn't have minded living in Iowa so much in the possible world in which it's on the Missisipipi Ocean
kraymondh.bsky.social
Always reassuring to find tasks that AI is terrible at:
An AI-generated "map of the American midwest" with states and other features mislabeled
kraymondh.bsky.social
Probably an issue that the heroes of so many stories are kooks who ignore all the experts.
Reposted by Keith Raymond Harris
floresophize.bsky.social
We all know beliefs can stubbornly resist evidence. Flat Earthers, climate deniers, our own political convictions—facts often seem totally incapable of changing minds.

But here’s the puzzle: Philosophy usually defines belief as *responsive to evidence*. So is the orthodox view just… wrong? 1/
Reposted by Keith Raymond Harris
gordonhodsonphd.bsky.social
#AcademicSky

Academics in the summer, when asked to review manuscripts.
"He was called away on an urgent matter" an admin staff tells a man, while the urgent-matter man is running to an ice cream truck
Reposted by Keith Raymond Harris
knowledgecrisis.bsky.social
Call for Game Developers!
Join the Truth, Lies & Democracy 2025 game jam (Sept 26–28, Vienna) to create interactive video games addressing a big challenge for democracies today — disinformation.
Apply by Aug 15
👉 More info:
Call for Applications: Truth, Lies & Democracy 2025
Call for Experienced Game Developers
buff.ly
Reposted by Keith Raymond Harris
kraymondh.bsky.social
Looking forward to this!
wfap.bsky.social
🚨 We are very pleased to invite you to our upcoming GRADUATE CONFERENCE:

🗓️ Dates: July 3–5, 2025
📍 Venue: Lecture Hall 3D, Neues Institutsgebäude (NIG)
University of Vienna, Universitätsstraße 7, 3rd Floor, 1010 Vienna

For more infos, please take a look at our website (link in bio!) 💻
Reposted by Keith Raymond Harris
rbnmckenna.bsky.social
New paper arguing that sometimes rational persuasion is a bad thing. It's available open access here:

www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
Abstract: What is persuasion and how does it differ from coercion, indoctrination, and manipulation? Which persuasive strategies are effective, and which contexts are they effective in? The aim of persuasion is attitude change, but when does a persuasive strategy yield a rational change of attitude? When is it permissible to engage in rational persuasion? In this paper, I address these questions, both in general and with reference to particular examples. The overall aims are (i) to sketch an integrated picture of the psychology, epistemology, and ethics of persuasion and (ii) to argue that there is often a tension between the aim we typically have as would-be persuaders, which is bringing about a rational change of mind, and the ethical constraints which partly distinguish persuasion from coercion, indoctrination, and manipulation.