Lucy Barnes
lucy-barnes.bsky.social
Lucy Barnes
@lucy-barnes.bsky.social
Professor of Political Economy, UCL. She/her. Here to lurk.
Thoughts and prayers
December 10, 2025 at 1:29 PM
Reposted by Lucy Barnes
For those who believe that the Commons should fairly represent the nation it serves, this is a story of remarkable progress. Those who would deny full and equal rights to people based on the race and religion natually don't see it that way, but thankfully they are a small (if noisy) minority.
December 4, 2025 at 12:41 PM
Reposted by Lucy Barnes
Overall, housing is a central and growing cleavage in politics, challenging class dealignment story. Relying on occupation risks mischaracterising the class basis of politics - we must update how we think about this to reflect era of asset-based capitalism

7/7

www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
Housing and electoral behaviour: The changing face of class voting in advanced democracies
Scholarship on the relationship between social structure and electoral behaviour has traditionally operationalised voters’ economic or class situation…
www.sciencedirect.com
November 26, 2025 at 4:25 PM
Sandel’s thesis is a different version of this: politics under neoliberalism* vacated the space of morality (incl. religious community); people want morality in politics; aggressive far right moral panics filled the void

*shorthand for vibes/era, not nec scholarly/intellectual position
November 25, 2025 at 8:29 PM
This question is less on my personal radar and I think other people will have more information interest in judging
November 22, 2025 at 8:27 PM
Note: it’s not like there are any things that would flag/trigger an immediate desk reject! This is (was) just one that I think often correlated with overall thinking the paper’s not quite ready, or not quite rightly targeted
November 22, 2025 at 8:24 PM
all very new and impressionistic but the main one is that I think a “flag” ~a year ago would be to fail to articulate any explicit argument for the paper’s importance or innovation. now those *forms* are almost always present, and it’s deeper work to separate the substantive from the specious
November 22, 2025 at 8:24 PM
speaking just for myself: trying to do this, but the numerical increase hits hard here too. Also “flags” for desk rejection are changing, in ways which also increase the editorial time required to reach each DR decision. No call for sympathy but it’s not trivial at the ed stage either.
Also: sorry!
November 22, 2025 at 7:16 PM
Reposted by Lucy Barnes
We'll have to go back to studying history and institutions don't we. Even elites, Lord help us. Like in the Dark Ages.
November 18, 2025 at 8:39 PM
100%!!!
November 18, 2025 at 7:25 PM
Strong agree, but worry about the degree to which this prescription comes from a place of relative privilege, ex ante, and survivor bias, ex post.

Maybe more universal: be good and be lucky, and if you can only pick one, be lucky
November 18, 2025 at 3:01 PM
Congratulations!
September 23, 2025 at 1:17 PM