lupus.blackfur
lupusblackfur.bsky.social
lupus.blackfur
@lupusblackfur.bsky.social
Cyber Mage, All-round Troubleshooter, Wizard of Repair, Retired.
Card-carrying member of Grumpy Old Man Club.
Opinions are my own... And boy, do I have some. Some of which are actually valid.
Oh, Feel free to ignore me & move along. It'll trouble me none.
Reposted by lupus.blackfur
I don’t talk about this much because more than 10 years after her death it makes me incandescent with rage. People act like disability benefits are handed out like candy but there are so many dumb as fuck obstacles erected thanks to right wing disinformation.
December 3, 2025 at 1:18 AM
Reposted by lupus.blackfur
Oof, plus the more progressive, the Solomon-aligned slate is really dominating city council elections.
December 3, 2025 at 1:08 AM
Reposted by lupus.blackfur
“Affirmative” asylum applications are filed with USCIS by people not facing removal. These applications are heard by asylum officers and done in a non-adversarial interview process.

By contrast, asylum applications adjudicated in immigration court in front of immigration judges are “defensive.”
Oh, man.

What does "affirmative" means in this context, thought?
December 3, 2025 at 1:03 AM
Reposted by lupus.blackfur
In addition, 500,000 people from those 19 countries who got green cards during the Biden admin, plus tens of thousands who got asylum/refugee status, as well as many others who received other benefits, now have to worry about potentially being called back in for a “re-review” (whatever that means).
December 3, 2025 at 1:00 AM
Wondering what color is the sky on the fantasy planet where Candice Owens lives...

🤦‍♂️🤷‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤷‍♂️

🫏🤡🖕🖕💩💩💩
December 3, 2025 at 1:04 AM
Reposted by lupus.blackfur
What this means in practice is that Cubans, Venezuelans, Haitians, and nationals of 16 other countries now will be unable to acquire ANY immigration benefit during until the USCIS Director lifts this hold — including people who were days away from become U.S. citizens.
December 3, 2025 at 12:57 AM
Reposted by lupus.blackfur
To those waiting for updates: We haven't gotten anything from Election Day yet — so nothing new.
December 3, 2025 at 12:57 AM
Reposted by lupus.blackfur
The states argue that the budget law harms them by forcing them to choose either to kick abortion providers out of Medicaid—harming their health care ecosystems in the process—or using state money to keep Planned Parenthood affiliates afloat.

But at least for now, the provision is still in effect
December 2, 2025 at 10:49 PM
Reposted by lupus.blackfur
“Her order lifting the Planned Parenthood funding ban applies only to the plaintiffs in the lawsuit: the Medicaid programs run by 22 states and the District of Columbia.”

In trying to limit nationwide injunctions, the Supreme Court has done its own work to split the country in two
Judge blocks provision of law that strips Medicaid funding for Planned Parenthood affiliates
The judge’s order lifting the funding ban applies to 22 states and D.C.
www.politico.com
December 3, 2025 at 12:51 AM