Dr Manu Saunders
@manusaunders.bsky.social
4.9K followers 1.4K following 470 posts
Ecologist. Mum. Writer. Senior Lecturer Uni New England (Australia). Editor in Chief: Insect Conservation and Diversity. Anaiwan Country. My words. She/her. https://ecologyisnotadirtyword.com https://saundersecologylab.com/
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Dr Manu Saunders
lollardfish.bsky.social
One of the constant strands in the history of the university, dating back to its medieval origins, is the attempt of authorities - especially religious authorities but not exclusively - to control what can and cannot be taught.
Reposted by Dr Manu Saunders
respublications.bsky.social
#RESMedVetEnt are delighted to welcome on board three new Editors-in-Chief: Maureen Laroche, Marion England and Philip Barton. 🎉

Learn more about our new team members here ⬇️
www.royensoc.co.uk/news/welcome...

@royentsoc.bsky.social
Maureen Laroche Marion England Philip Barton
Reposted by Dr Manu Saunders
respublications.bsky.social
The new issue of #RESInsectConsDiv is now available! 📢

It includes the "Restoration & rescue in an age of extinction: advances in #arthropod #translocation & #reintroduction" #SpecialIssue! 🎉

Learn more about this important area of #Conservation in this Q&A with the guest Editors⬇️
buff.ly/FUJMFoR
Reposted by Dr Manu Saunders
respublications.bsky.social
New research in #RESInsectConsDiv

#Grazing-induced changes in the #abundance and diversity of #grasshoppers is mediated through changes in plant functional groups
doi.org/10.1111/icad.70020

#Biodiversity #Orthoptera
@manusaunders.bsky.social @wiley.com
Reposted by Dr Manu Saunders
rezekjoe.bsky.social
Why even have a brain, any ideas, any ability to express them, any kind of communication with other people, any desire to solve problems or invent anything, any reason to learn, any use for your eyes or your heart, or any reason to teach or create
From NYT article about the increasing use of AI in the classroom: “Writing is one of the most challenging tasks for students, which is why it is so tempting for some to ask A.I. to do it for them. In turn, A.I. can be useful for teachers who would like to assign more writing, but are limited in their time to grade it.”
Reposted by Dr Manu Saunders
arc-tracker.bsky.social
Here's the link to their "stakeholder survey on the use of AI in grant assessment":

www.surveymonkey.com/r/X7PY5GL
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/X7PY5GL
t.co
Reposted by Dr Manu Saunders
tryangregory.bsky.social
I like the analogy of digital asbestos. Treated like a miracle product now, but it's going to be a huge pain to remove all the embedded AI slop in the future.
bhaggart.bsky.social
And if/when the genAI bubble bursts and society reacts to the damage it’s causing, there’s a good chance that your AI dependence will leave you at a disadvantage against not just older workers who did the work on their own, but younger students as well.
manusaunders.bsky.social
THIS 👇
bhaggart.bsky.social
For all the good-will efforts to reimagine learning in the ChatGPT era, the elephant in the room is that moving away from independent research assignments toward in-class, supervised learning effectively turns universities into glorified high schools.
desfitzgerald.bsky.social
I spoke to the Irish Times for this very good and rounded piece on the real-world effects of C***GPT in the humanities classroom: www.irishtimes.com/ireland/educ...
manusaunders.bsky.social
Is it ethical for academic institutions to actively try and discourage students from using genAI to do their assessments while also encouraging academic staff to use genAI to write assessments and content? #AcademicSky
manusaunders.bsky.social
THIS. The techwashing narrative that our future is inevitably AI-driven is ingrained, but so wrong.
olivia.science
2. the strange but often repeated cultish mantra that we need to "embrace the future" — this is so bizarre given, e.g. how destructive industry forces have proven to be in science, from petroleum to tobacco to pharmaceutical companies.

(Section 3.2 here doi.org/10.5281/zeno...)
4/n
3.2 We do not have to ‘embrace the future’ & we can turn back the tide
It must be the sheer magnitude of [artificial neural networks’] incompetence that makes
them so popular.
Jerry A. Fodor (2000, p. 47)
Related to the rejection of expertise is the rejection of imagining a better future and the rejection
of self-determination free from industry forces (Hajer and Oomen 2025; Stengers 2018; van Rossum
2025). Not only AI enthusiasts, but even some scholars whose expertise concentrates on identifying
and critically interrogating ideologies and sociotechnical relationships — such as historians and gender scholars — unfortunately fall prey to the teleological belief that AI is an unstoppable force. They
embrace it because alternative responses seem too difficult, incompatible with industry developments,
or non-existent. Instead of falling for this, we should “refuse [AI] adoption in schools and colleges,
and reject the narrative of its inevitability.” (Reynoldson et al. 2025, n.p., also Benjamin 2016; Campolo and Crawford 2020; CDH Team and Ruddick 2025; Garcia et al. 2022; Kelly et al. 2025; Lysen
and Wyatt 2024; Sano-Franchini et al. 2024; Stengers 2018). Such rejection is possible and has historical precedent, to name just a few successful examples: Amsterdammers kicked out cars, rejecting
that cycling through the Dutch capital should be deadly. Organised workers died for the eight-hour
workday, the weekend and other workers’ rights, and governments banned chlorofluorocarbons from
fridges to mitigate ozone depletion in the atmosphere. And we know that even the tide itself famously
turns back. People can undo things; and we will (cf. Albanese 2025; Boztas 2025; Kohnstamm Instituut 2025; van Laarhoven and van Vugt 2025). Besides, there will be no future to embrace if we deskill
our students and selves, and allow the technology industry’s immense contributions to climate crisis
Reposted by Dr Manu Saunders
olivia.science
Finally! 🤩 Our position piece: Against the Uncritical Adoption of 'AI' Technologies in Academia:
doi.org/10.5281/zeno...

We unpick the tech industry’s marketing, hype, & harm; and we argue for safeguarding higher education, critical
thinking, expertise, academic freedom, & scientific integrity.
1/n
Abstract: Under the banner of progress, products have been uncritically adopted or
even imposed on users — in past centuries with tobacco and combustion engines, and in
the 21st with social media. For these collective blunders, we now regret our involvement or
apathy as scientists, and society struggles to put the genie back in the bottle. Currently, we
are similarly entangled with artificial intelligence (AI) technology. For example, software updates are rolled out seamlessly and non-consensually, Microsoft Office is bundled with chatbots, and we, our students, and our employers have had no say, as it is not
considered a valid position to reject AI technologies in our teaching and research. This
is why in June 2025, we co-authored an Open Letter calling on our employers to reverse
and rethink their stance on uncritically adopting AI technologies. In this position piece,
we expound on why universities must take their role seriously toa) counter the technology
industry’s marketing, hype, and harm; and to b) safeguard higher education, critical
thinking, expertise, academic freedom, and scientific integrity. We include pointers to
relevant work to further inform our colleagues. Figure 1. A cartoon set theoretic view on various terms (see Table 1) used when discussing the superset AI
(black outline, hatched background): LLMs are in orange; ANNs are in magenta; generative models are
in blue; and finally, chatbots are in green. Where these intersect, the colours reflect that, e.g. generative adversarial network (GAN) and Boltzmann machine (BM) models are in the purple subset because they are
both generative and ANNs. In the case of proprietary closed source models, e.g. OpenAI’s ChatGPT and
Apple’s Siri, we cannot verify their implementation and so academics can only make educated guesses (cf.
Dingemanse 2025). Undefined terms used above: BERT (Devlin et al. 2019); AlexNet (Krizhevsky et al.
2017); A.L.I.C.E. (Wallace 2009); ELIZA (Weizenbaum 1966); Jabberwacky (Twist 2003); linear discriminant analysis (LDA); quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA). Table 1. Below some of the typical terminological disarray is untangled. Importantly, none of these terms
are orthogonal nor do they exclusively pick out the types of products we may wish to critique or proscribe. Protecting the Ecosystem of Human Knowledge: Five Principles
manusaunders.bsky.social
Glorious spring day in the New England gorge country near Armidale. Local endemic Ingram's wattle having a glow up #wildoz #ozplants
Clear blue sky, underlined by a rugged cliff face covered in trees. Flowering wattles glow gold among the green and brown
Reposted by Dr Manu Saunders
royentsoc.bsky.social
Expansion and #urbanisation pose a significant threat to #biodiversity. A recent #OpenAccess #review published in #RESInsectConsDiv, Drukker et al. challenge current views of #GreenRoofs ⬇️

www.royensoc.co.uk/news/insect-...

#UrbanInsects #Ecosystems
@manusaunders.bsky.social @wiley.com
respublications.bsky.social
New #OpenAccess #review available in #RESInsectConsDiv

The development of insect #diversity and #ecosystem complexity on #GreenRoofs

Read the full review ⬇️
doi.org/10.1111/icad.70007

#Biodiversity #UrbanInsects #Ecosystems
@manusaunders.bsky.social @wiley.com

Video credit: E.Drukker & C.Bomen
Reposted by Dr Manu Saunders
caseydreier.bsky.social
This is a shocking executive order that undermines the very idea of open inquiry. It turns federal grants into dispensations, subject to arbitrary and capricious withdrawal should the recipient say or believe the wrong things.

www.whitehouse.gov/presidential...
Improving Oversight of Federal Grantmaking
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and to improve the process of Federal
www.whitehouse.gov
manusaunders.bsky.social
agree, many teachers doing an amazing job within the policy/system constraints they deal with
manusaunders.bsky.social
We've failed so much at general science education that denialists and conspiracy hawkers can easily masquerade as 'fact checkers' or 'independent journos' and mislead huge numbers of people that science is just about opinions, not a rigorous method of inquiry theconversation.com/friday-essay...
Friday essay: Trump and Kennedy are destroying global science. Even Einstein questioned facts – but there’s a method to it
Modern science emerged precisely to deal with the way everything can be manipulated – and scepticism over ‘facts’ goes all the way back to Socrates.
theconversation.com